Etnografiden Netnografiye Etik: 4A Modeline Dayalı Bir Kuramsal Çerçeve Önerisi

Betül Çebi

EN TR

Etnografiden Netnografiye Etik: 4A Modeline Dayalı Bir Kuramsal Çerçeve Önerisi

Öz

: Bu makale, kuramsal bir derleme olarak etnografiden netnografiye geçiş sürecinde ortaya çıkan etik sorunları bütüncül biçimde ele almayı amaçlamaktadır. Netnografi çalışmalarında, araştırmacının rolünü açıklaması, katılımcı kimliklerinin korunması, onam süreçlerinin işletilmesi ve araştırma alanının niteliğinin belirlenmesi güvenilirlik açısından kritik görülmektedir. Ancak literatürde bu başlıkların çoğu ayrı ayrı incelenmiş, araştırmacılara kapsamlı bir yol haritası sunulmamıştır. Bu eksiklikten hareketle çalışma, etik tartışmaları sistematik hale getiren 4A Etik Modeli’ni (Açıklama, Anonimlik, Anlaşma, Alan) önermektedir. Model yalnızca araştırmacılar için değil, etik kurullar açısından da işlevsel bir çerçeve sunmaktadır. Özellikle lisansüstü araştırmalarda metodolojik ve etik zorlukların aşılmasına katkı sağlayacak rehber niteliği taşımaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Addeo, F., Paoli, A., Esposito, M., & Bolcato, M. (2019). Doing social research on online communities: The benefits of netnography. American Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), 9-38. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajss.7-1-1
Akuma, I., & Vaswani, V. (2024). Exploring partial disclosure in research: Challenges, justifications, and recommendations for ethical oversight. Asian Bioethics Review, 17, 21-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-024-00311-7
Alyanak Büker, Z. (2015). Etnografi ve çevrimiçi etnografi. In M. Binark (Ed.), Yeni medya çalışmalarında araştırma yöntem ve teknikleri (2. baskı, ss. 117-163). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
Attard, A., & Coulson, N. S. (2012). A thematic analysis of patient communication in Parkinson’s disease online support group discussion forums. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 500-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.022
Barnes, S. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v11i9.1394
Barnes, N., Penn-Edwards, S., & Sim, C. (2015). A dialogic about using Facebook status updates for education research: A PhD student's journey. Educational Research and Evaluation, 21(2), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2015.1024429
Baruh, L., Secinti, E., & Cemalcılar, Z. (2017). Online privacy concerns and privacy management: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Communication, 67, 26-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12276
Bassett, E. H., & O’Riordan, K. (2002). Ethics of internet research: Contesting the human subjects research model. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 233-247. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021319125207

Battistone, M., Kemeyou, L., & Varpio, L. (2023). The theoretical integrative review—A reader's guide. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 15(4), 449-452. https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-23-00265.1
Beaven, Z., & Laws, C. (2007). “Never let me down again”: Loyal customer attitudes towards ticket distribution channels for live music events: A netnographic exploration of the US leg of the Depeche Mode 2005–2006 world tour. Managing Leisure, 12(2-3), 120-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13606710701339322
Beddows, E. (2008). The methodological issues associated with internet-based research. International Journal of Emerging Technologies & Society, 6(2), 124-133.
Bender, J., Cyr, A., Arbuckle, L., & Ferris, L. (2017). Ethics and privacy implications of using the internet and social media to recruit participants for health research: A privacy-by-design framework for online recruitment. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(4), e7029. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7029
Bettany, S. M., & Kerrane, B. (2016). The socio-materiality of parental style. European Journal of Marketing, 50(11), 2041-2066. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-07-2015-0437
Binark, M., Yalçın, H., Karataş, Ş., & Çomu, T. (2017). Sosyal bilim araştırmalarında Türkiye’de veri etiği politikası: Sosyal medya ortamlarından veri toplanması. Sosyoloji Divanı, 5(9), 101-127.
Buchanan, T., & Smith, J. L. (1999). Research on the internet: Validation of a World-Wide Web mediated personality scale. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(4), 565-571. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200736
Bruckman, A. (2002). Studying the amateur artist: A perspective on disguising data collected in human subjects research on the Internet. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 217-231. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021316409277
Candela, A. (2019). Exploring the function of member checking. The Qualitative Report, 24(3), 619-628. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3726
Cera, M. (2023). Digital ethnography: Ethics through the case of QAnon. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, 1119531. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1119531
Chen, J., Hu, C., Sheng, W., Xiang, T., Hu, P., & Yu, J. (2025). Sensitivity-aware personalized differential privacy guarantees for online social networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 20, 3116-3130. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2025.3551642
Cortés, Y., Arcia, A., Kearney, J., Luchsinger, J., & Lucero, R. (2017). Urban-dwelling community members’ views on biomedical research engagement. Qualitative Health Research, 27, 130-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315627650
Costello, L., McDermott, M. L., & Wallace, R. (2017). Netnography: Range of practices, misperceptions, and missed opportunities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917700647
Davis, T. (2010). Third spaces or heterotopias? Recreating and negotiating migrant identity using online spaces. Sociology, 44(4), 661-677. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510369356
Doerr, M., Moore, S., Barone, V., Sutherland, S., Bot, B., Suver, C., & Wilbanks, J. (2021). Assessment of the All of Us research program’s informed consent process. AJOB Empirical Bioethics, 12, 72-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2020.1847214
Doerr, M., Truong, A., Bot, B., Wilbanks, J., Suver, C., & Mangravite, L. (2017). Formative evaluation of participant experience with mobile eConsent in the app-mediated Parkinson mPower study: A mixed methods study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 5(2), e14. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.6521
Elgesem, D. (2002). What is special about the ethical issues in online research? Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021320510186
Eren Çetin, Ş. (2019). Katılımcı kültür olgusu bağlamında sosyal medya ve çevrimiçi topluluklar: Netnografik bir analiz (Doktora tezi). Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Antalya. https://tez.yok.gov.tr
Eynon, R., Fry, J., & Schroeder, R. (2008). The ethics of internet research. In N. Fielding, R. M. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of online research methods (pp. 23-41). London: SAGE.
Flicker, S., Haans, D., & Skinner, H. (2004). Ethical dilemmas in research on Internet communities. Qualitative Health Research, 14(1), 124-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303259842
Gadotti, A., Rocher, L., Houssiau, F., Creţu, A., & De Montjoye, Y. (2024). Anonymization: The imperfect science of using data while preserving privacy. Science Advances, 10(29), eadn7053. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adn7053
Glaser, J., Dixit, J., & Green, D. (2002). Studying hate crime with the internet: What makes racists advocate racial violence? Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 177-193. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00255
Glesne, C. (2015). Nitel araştırmaya giriş (A. Ersoy & P. Yalçınoğlu, Çev. Ed.; 5. baskı). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Gerrard, Y. (2021). What’s in a (pseudo)name? Ethical conundrums for the principles of anonymisation in social media research. Qualitative Research, 21(5), 686-702. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120922070
Gürçayır Teke, S. (2014). Dönüşen anneliğe yönelik netnografik bir analiz: Blogger anneler. Milli Folklor, 26(103), 67-79.
Haggerty, K. D. (2004). Ethics creep: Governing social science research in the name of ethics. Qualitative Sociology, 27(4), 391-414. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUAS.0000049239.15922.a3
Haynes, E., Elam, S., Burns, R., Spencer, A., Yancey, E., Kuhnell, P., Alden, J., Walton, M., Reynolds, V., Newman, N., Wright, R., Parsons, P., Praamsma, M., Palmer, C., & Dietrich, K. (2016). Community engagement and data disclosure in environmental health research. Environmental Health Perspectives, 124(2), A24-A27. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1510411
Hewson, C. (2016). Dijital yöntem araştırmalarında etik sorunu. In H. Snee, C. Hine, Y. Morey, S. Roberts, & H. Watson (Eds.), Sosyal bilimler için dijital yöntemler (A. Arslan, Çev.; 1. baskı, ss. 206-221). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
Hewson, C. M., Laurent, D., & Vogel, C. M. (1996). Proper methodologies for psychological and sociological studies conducted via the Internet. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28(2), 186-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204763
Hine, C. (2005). Internet research and the sociology of cyber-social-scientific knowledge. The Information Society, 21(4), 239-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240591007553
Hine, C. (2008). Virtual ethnography: Modes, varieties, affordances. In N. Fielding, R. M. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of online research methods (pp. 257-270). London: SAGE.
Hulland, J. (2020). Conceptual review papers: Revisiting existing research to develop and refine theory. AMS Review, 10(1), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00168-7
Jacobson, D. (1999). Doing research in cyberspace. Field Methods, 11(2), 127-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X9901100204
Jong, S. T. (2019). Netnography: Researching online populations. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in health social sciences (pp. 1321-1337). Singapore: Springer.
Kantanen, H., & Manninen, J. (2016). Hazy boundaries: Virtual communities and research ethics. Media and Communication, 4(4), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i4.576
Karakulakoğlu, S. (2014). İnternet araştırmalarında yöntem sorunu. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 3(4), 122-134. https://doi.org/10.17680/akademia.v3i4.5000013908
Kozinets, R. V. (1998). On netnography: Initial reflections on consumer research investigations of cyberculture. Advances in Consumer Research, 25(1), 366-371.
Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935
Kozinets, R. V. (2006). Click to connect: Netnography and tribal advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 46(3), 279-288. https://doi.org/10.2501/S0021849906060338
Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. London, UK: SAGE Publications.
Kozinets, R. V. (2012). Marketing Netnography: Prom/ot(Ulgat)ing a New Research Method. Methodological Innovations Online, 7(1), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.4256/mio.2012.004
Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography: Redefined. London, UK: SAGE Publications.
Kozinets, R. V. (2018). Netnography for management and business research. In C. Cassell, A. L. Cunliffe, & G. Grandy (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative business and management research methods: History and traditions (pp. 384-397). London, UK: SAGE.
Kulavuz Onal, D., & Vásquez, C. (2013). Reconceptualising fieldwork in a netnography of an online community of English language teachers. Ethnography and Education, 8(2), 224-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2013.792511
Langer, R., & Beckman, S. C. (2005). Sensitive research topics: Netnography revisited. Qualitative Market Research, 8(2), 189-203. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750510592454
Lehner-Mear, R. (2020). Negotiating the ethics of netnography: Developing an ethical approach to an online study of mother perspectives. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 23(2), 123-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2019.1634879
Lugosi, P., Janta, H., & Watson, P. (2012). Investigative management and consumer research on the Internet. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 24(6), 838-854. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596111211247191
Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee (Version 2.0). Association of Internet Researchers. Retrieved from https://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf
Marques, A., & Aires, G. (2020). Uso da netnografia para a geração de personas e requisitos para sistemas com foco em pessoas com transtorno do espectro autista: Um relato de experiência. Anais do Workshop sobre Aspectos Sociais, Humanos e Econômicos de Software (WASHES 2020), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.5753/washes.2020.11192
Mehta, R., & Sivadas, E. (1995). Direct marketing on the Internet: An empirical assessment of consumer attitudes. Journal of Direct Marketing, 9(3), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.4000090305
Merriam, S. B. (2013). Nitel araştırma: Desen ve uygulama için bir rehber (S. Turan, Çev. Ed.; 3. baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
Nelson, M. R., & Otnes, C. C. (2005). Exploring cross-cultural ambivalence: A netnography of intercultural wedding message boards. Journal of Business Research, 58(1), 89-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00477-0
Oswald, D., Sherratt, F., & Smith, S. (2014). Handling the Hawthorne effect: The challenges surrounding a participant observer. Review of Social Studies, 1(1), 53-73.
Pires de Sá, F. (2018). Connected co-viewing on Facebook: A Brazilian telenovela and the perception of media realism. Television & New Media, 19(7), 646-659. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476417741672
Prior, D. D., & Miller, L. M. (2012). Webethnography: Towards a typology for quality in research design. International Journal of Market Research, 54(4), 503-520. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-54-4-503-520
Reilly, P., & Trevisan, F. (2016). Researching protest on Facebook: Developing an ethical stance for the study of Northern Irish flag protest pages. Information, Communication & Society, 19(3), 419-435. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1104373
Rosenberg, A. (2010). Virtual world research ethics and the private/public distinction. International Journal of Internet Research Ethics, 3(1), 23-37.
Sahakyan, T. (2023). Member-checking through diagrammatic elicitation: Constructing meaning with participants. TESOL Quarterly, 57(2), 686-701. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3210
Sandlin, J. A. (2007). Netnography as a consumer education research tool. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(3), 288-294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00550.x
Saunders, B., Kitzinger, J., & Kitzinger, C. (2015). Anonymising interview data: Challenges and compromise in practice. Qualitative Research, 15(5), 616-632. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114550439
Sharf, B. F. (1999). Beyond netiquette. In S. Jones (Ed.), Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the Net (pp. 243–256). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Skageby, J. (2007). Analytical dimensions for online gift giving: ‘Other-oriented’ contributions in virtual communities. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 3(1), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWBC.2007.013774
Schembri, S., & Latimer, L. (2016). Online brand communities: Constructing and co-constructing brand culture. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(7-8), 628-651. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1117518
Sugiura, L., Wiles, R., & Pope, C. (2017). Ethical challenges in online research: Public/private perceptions. Research Ethics, 13(3-4), 184-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116650720
Şafak, D. (2017). Etnografiden netnografiye sanal ortamda kurşun dökme: “Sen bi kurşun döktür”. Millî Folklor, 29(116), 156-168.
Tsay-Vogel, M., Shanahan, J., & Signorielli, N. (2018). Social media cultivating perceptions of privacy: A 5-year analysis of privacy attitudes and self-disclosure behaviors among Facebook users. New Media & Society, 20(1), 141-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816660731
Tuikka, A. M., Nguyen, C., & Kimppa, K. K. (2017). Ethical questions related to using netnography as research method. ORBIT Journal, 1(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.29297/orbit.v1i2.50
Wade, J. (2020). Netnography: A pocket guide to conducting research in closed virtual communities. Drake Management Review, 9(1), 1-14.
Whalen, E. (2018). Understanding a shifting methodology. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(11), 3423-3441. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-08-2017-0536
Whiteman, N. (2012). Undoing ethics: Rethinking practice in online research. New York, NY: Springer.
Winter, R., & Lavis, A. (2020). Looking, but not listening? Theorizing the practice and ethics of online ethnography. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(1-2), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646198575
Wu, M. Y., & Pearce, P. L. (2014). Chinese recreational vehicle users in Australia: A netnographic study of tourist motivation. Tourism Management, 43, 22-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.01.010
Xu, A., Baysari, M., Stocker, S., Leow, L., Day, R., & Carland, J. (2020). Researchers’ views on, and experiences with, the requirement to obtain informed consent in research involving human participants: A qualitative study. BMC Medical Ethics, 21(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00538-7
Xun, J., & Reynolds, J. (2010). Applying netnography to market research: The case of the online forum. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 18(1), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.1057/jt.2009.29

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Psikolojik Metodoloji, Tasarım ve Analiz

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Betül Çebi ^*
0000-0003-1293-9085
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

27 Nisan 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

23 Eylül 2025

Kabul Tarihi

27 Şubat 2026

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA29CZ63SH

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Çebi, B. (2026). Etnografiden Netnografiye Etik: 4A Modeline Dayalı Bir Kuramsal Çerçeve Önerisi. Türk Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(1), 96-114. https://izlik.org/JA29CZ63SH

Etnografiden Netnografiye Etik: 4A Modeline Dayalı Bir Kuramsal Çerçeve Önerisi

ETHİCS FROM ETHNOGRAPHY TO NETNOGRAPHY: A THEORETİCAL FRAMEWORK PROPOSAL BASED ON THE 4A MODEL

Abstract

Keywords

Etnografiden Netnografiye Etik: 4A Modeline Dayalı Bir Kuramsal Çerçeve Önerisi

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

IZ

Kaynak Göster