One or more corrections and improvements may be requested by the editors, field editors and / or referees for the studies in the evaluation process.
The author (s) are obliged to complete corrections and improvements in a complete, explanatory and timely manner, with the awareness that the requested correction and improvement suggestions for objective and increase the originality of the study.
Author (s) must upload the requested corrections and improvements to the system according to the conditions specified in the "Correction Directive and Upload Guide".

Work/Article Retract
The duties and responsibilities of the author (s) and the editorial board during the withdrawal of a study or article in accordance with the journal's publication policies are given below.
Authors
In the event that the author (s) notices a mistake or mistake about the published work, at the early view or evaluation stage, it has an obligation to cooperate with the journal editor in withdrawal procedures.
The author (s) who wish to request to withdraw their work at the evaluation stage are obliged to fill in the "Withdrawal Form" and submit the scanned version with the wet signature of each author to the editorial board via e-mail at iibf@ikc.edu.tr. The Editorial Board reviews the withdrawal notification and returns within one week at the latest.
Authors cannot submit their study to another journal for evaluation unless the withdrawal request of the manuscripts transferred by the editorial board at the time of submission is approved.

Editors

Editorial board; In case of suspicion of copyright and plagiarism regarding a published, early-view or under evaluation work, it is obliged to initiate an investigation into the study.
If the editorial board determines that there is copyright and plagiarism in the study at the evaluation stage, it withdraws the work from the evaluation and returns the detected situations to the authors with detailed reference.
If the editorial board detects copyright infringement and plagiarism in a published or early-view work, it will take the following recalls and notification procedures within one week at the latest.
Study involving ethical violations;
1. "Withdrawn:" phrase is added to the beginning of the title in electronic display.
2. Instead of the “Abstract and Full text” contents in electronic display, the reasons for withdrawal of the study, if there are detailed sources of evidence, are published together with the notifications of the institutions and organizations to which the author (s) are affiliated.
3. The withdrawal notice is announced on the main page of the journal website.
4. As of the date of withdrawal, the electronic and hard copy of the first issue to be published is added to the table of contents as "Withdrawn: Study Title", the reasons for withdrawal and the original citations referenced to it are shared with the public and researchers, provided that starting from the first page.
5. The above withdrawal notifications are sent to the organization (s) to which the author (s) are affiliated.
6. The withdrawal notifications listed above are sent to the institutions and organizations in which the Journal is indexed and to the National Library Directorate for registration in index systems and catalogs.
In addition, the editorial board may suggest that the author (s) of the study whose ethical violation has been violated may recommend to publishing houses or editorial boards to secure or withdraw the validity and reliability of the published studies.

Objection to the Evaluation Result
The author (s) can object to the evaluation result.

The author (s) should send the objection justifications regarding the results of the evaluation made for their studies to iibf@ikc.edu.tr in a scientific language and by referring to the bases by e-mail.
The objections made are examined by the editorial board within one month at the latest (opinion can be requested about the objections made to the field editor and referees of the study), and a positive or negative response is provided to the author (s).
If the objections of the author (s) to the evaluation result are found positive, the editorial board restarts the evaluation process by making new referees in accordance with the subject area of the study.