Leadership and Supply Chain Management Practices in Fourth-Party Logistics: An Empirical Analysis

Berna Çağlar; Hakan Dilek

TR EN

Dördüncü Taraf Lojistikte Liderlik ve Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi Uygulamaları: Ampirik Bir Analiz

Öz

Liderler, tedarik zinciri yönetimi süreçlerinin her adımını koordine etmektedir. Etkili liderler, çalışanların gelişimini teşvik ederek tedarik zinciri süreçlerinin daha etkili ve verimli olmasını sağlamaktadır. Literatürde, liderlik ve tedarik zinciri yönetimi faaliyetleri üzerine çeşitli alanlarda çalışmalar yapılmıştır. Ancak, mevcut literatürde lojistik hizmet sağlayıcıları da dahil edilerek liderliğin tedarik zinciri yönetimi üzerindeki etkileri incelenmemiştir. Bu çalışma, tedarik zinciri yöneticisi rolünü üstlenen dördüncü taraf lojistik hizmet sağlayıcılarının performansını artıracak liderlik yaklaşımlarını ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu çalışmada, dördüncü taraf lojistik hizmet sağlayıcılarının operasyon ve tedarik zinciri departmanlarındaki yöneticilerden elde edilen anket verilerini kullanılmaktadır. Araştırmanın analiz sonuçları, SmartPLS ile yapısal denklemlerin modellenmesi yoluyla elde edilmiştir. Araştırmanın sonucu, liderlik özelliklerinin tedarik zinciri yönetimi teknikleri üzerindeki etkisini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu noktada, dördüncü taraf lojistik hizmet sağlayıcılarının üst yönetiminin bakış açısı ve işletmelerin liderlik stratejisinin sürecin sorunsuz işleyişi için oldukça önemli olduğu sonucuna varılabilir. Dördüncü taraf lojistik hizmet sağlayıcıları üzerine yapılan bu çalışma, tedarik zinciri yönetimi uygulamaları ile liderlik arasındaki ilişkiye dair literatürdeki bir boşluğu doldurmayı amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma örneklemindeki dördüncü taraf lojistik hizmet sağlayıcılarının farklı büyüklükleri ve sektörleri, bu çalışmanın sınırlarını oluşturmaktadır..

Anahtar Kelimeler

Leadership and Supply Chain Management Practices in Fourth-Party Logistics: An Empirical Analysis

Abstract

Leaders coordinate every step of supply chain management processes. Effective leaders ensure that supply chain processes are more effective and efficient by encouraging the development of employees. In the literature, studies on leadership and supply chain management activities have been conducted in various fields. However, the existing literature has not examined the effects of leadership on supply chain management by including logistics service providers. This study aims to reveal leadership approaches that will improve the performance of fourth-party logistics service providers who undertake the role of supply chain managers. This study utilizes survey data from managers in the operations and supply chain departments of fourth-party logistics service providers. The results were obtained by modeling structural equations with SmartPLS. The research's conclusion reveals the influence of leadership characteristics on supply chain management techniques. At this point, it can be concluded that the perspective of the top management of the fourth-party logistics service providers and the leadership strategy of the businesses are quite important for the smooth functioning of the process. This study on fourth-party logistics service providers aims to fill a gap in the literature on the relationship between supply chain management practices and leadership. The different sizes and industries of the fourth-party logistics service providers in the research sample present limits for this study.

Keywords

Kaynakça

Ahmad, S., Zulkurnain, N. N. A., & Khairushalimi, F. I. (2016). Assessing the fitness of a measurement model using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 17(1), 159–166.
Abeysekera, I., & Jayakody, J. (2012). Do transformational leadership and relationship marketing make a difference for sustainable marketing? International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(8), 45–54.
Akhtar, P., Kaur, S., & Punjaisri, K. (2017). Chain coordinators’ strategic leadership and coordination effectiveness: New Zealand-Euro agri-food supply chains. European Business Review, 29(5), 515–533.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.
Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19–31.
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Psychology Press.
Birasnav, M. (2013). Transformational leadership and supply chain management practices: An empirical study. International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, 5(4), 361–377.
Budur, T., & Poturak, M. (2021). Transformational leadership and its impact on customer satisfaction: Measuring mediating effects of organisational citizenship behaviours. Management: Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 26(2), 1–22.

Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.
Chen, I. J., & Paulraj, A. (2004). Towards a theory of supply chain management: The constructs and measurements. Journal of Operations Management, 22(2), 119–150.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Psychology Press.
Christopher, M., & Towill, D. R. (2000). Supply chain migration from lean and functional to agile and customised. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 5(4), 206–213.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum. Davenport, E. C., Davison, M. L., Liou, P. Y., & Love, Q. U. (2015). Reliability, dimensionality, and internal consistency as defined by Cronbach: Distinct albeit related concepts. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34(4), 4–9.
Defee, C. C. (2007). Supply chain leadership (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee).
Defee, C. C., Stank, T. P., & Esper, T. (2010). Performance implications of transformational supply chain leadership and followership. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40(10), 763–791.
Flynn, B. B., Huo, B., & Zhao, X. (2010). The impact of supply chain integration on performance. Journal of Operations Management, 28(1), 58–71.
Fulconis, F., & Paché, G. (2018). Supply chain monitoring: LLPs and 4PL providers as orchestrators. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 238, 9–18.
Gattorna, J., Ogulin, R., & Selen, W. (2004). An empirical investigation of 3rd- and 4th-party logistics provider practices in Australia. ANZAM Operations Management Symposium.
Güleş, H. K., Paksoy, T., Bülbül, H., & Özceylan, E. (2012). Tedarik zinciri yönetimi: Stratejik planlama, modelleme ve optimizasyon (Genişletilmiş 2. baskı).
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115–135.
Jermsittiparsert, K., & Srihirun, W. (2019). Leadership in supply chain management: Role of gender as moderator. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(2), 448–466.
Lambert, D. M., Cooper, M. C., & Pagh, J. D. (1998). Supply chain management: Implementation issues and research opportunities. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 9(2), 1–20.
Langton, I., & Mafini, C. (2023). Small and medium business transformational leadership and supply chain management. Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 19(1), 1–11.
Lentz, G. (2015). Leagility from a 4PL perspective based on the concept of supply chain flexibility (Master’s thesis, Jönköping University).
Li, S., Ragu-Nathan, B., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Rao, S. S. (2006). The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance. Omega, 34(2), 107–124.
Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J. S., et al. (2001). Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 1–25.
Moorthy, R. (2014). An empirical study of leadership theory preferences among Gen Y in Malaysia. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 3(2), 398–412.
Nugraha, A. T., Fitri, H., Widiyanti, M., Guntoro, R., & Sulastri, S. (2019). The role of the risk management committee in managing supply chain risk and enhancing supply chain performance. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(1), 319–327.
Ojha, D., Acharya, C., & Cooper, D. (2018). Transformational leadership and supply chain ambidexterity. International Journal of Production Economics, 197, 215–231.
Pagell, M., & Wu, Z. (2009). Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(2), 37–56.
Prajogo, D. I., & Sohal, A. S. (2006). The relationship between organization strategy and performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 168(1), 35–50.
Ratcliffe, J., & Ratcliffe, L. (2015). Anticipatory leadership and strategic foresight. Journal of Futures Studies, 20(1), 1–18.
Saglietto, L. (2013). Towards a classification of fourth party logistics (4PL). Universal Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 1(3), 104–116.
Sánchez-Flores, R. B., Ojeda-Benítez, S., Cruz-Sotelo, S. E., & Navarro-González, C. R. (2020). Supply chain performance improvement. In Techniques, tools and methodologies applied to global supply chain ecosystems (pp. 333–358).
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2017). Treating unobserved heterogeneity in PLS-SEM. In Partial least squares path modeling (pp. 197–217). Springer.
Selviaridis, K., & Spring, M. (2007). Third party logistics: A literature review. The International Journal of Logistics Management.
Setiabudi, K. J., Siagian, H., & Tarigan, Z. J. H. (2021). The effect of transformational leadership on firm performance. Petra International Journal of Business Studies, 4(1), 65–73.
Sharif, A. M., & Irani, Z. (2012). Supply chain leadership. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 57–68.
Sundram, V. P. K., Chandran, V. G. R., & Bhatti, M. A. (2016). Supply chain practices and performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 23(6), 1445–1471.
Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling methods in research methodology.
Tang, C. S. (2006). Perspectives in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 103(2), 451–488.
Win, A. (2008). The value a 4PL provider can contribute to an organization. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(9), 674–684.
Wisner, J. D., Tan, K. C., & Leong, G. K. (2021). Principles of supply chain management: A balanced approach. Cengage Learning.
Wong, A. (2001). Leadership for effective supply chain partnership. Total Quality Management, 12(7–8), 913–919.
Yıldız, E. (2024). SmartPLS ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi: Reflektif ve formatif yapılar (3. baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2024). SmartPLS 4. https://www.smartpls.com

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Uluslararası İşletmecilik , Liderlik , Üretim ve Operasyon Yönetimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Berna Çağlar ^*
0000-0002-6963-2992
Türkiye

Hakan Dilek
0000-0002-4389-7781
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

27 Nisan 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

12 Ocak 2026

Kabul Tarihi

7 Nisan 2026

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA59UK98WA

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Çağlar, B., & Dilek, H. (2026). Leadership and Supply Chain Management Practices in Fourth-Party Logistics: An Empirical Analysis. Türk Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(1), 80-95. https://izlik.org/JA59UK98WA