Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Globalizasyon, Deglobalizasyon ve ABD-Çin Rekabeti: Jeopolitik ve Jeoekonomi Arasındaki Denge

Year 2023, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 89 - 113, 17.10.2023

Murat Güneylioğlu

Abstract

Bu makale, globalizasyon ve deglobalizasyon süreçlerinin genel olarak büyük güç siyasetini ve özel olarak ABD-Çin stratejik rekabetini nasıl etkilediğini incelemektedir. Makale, Soğuk Savaş sonrası küreselleşme sürecinin etkisiyle büyük güç siyasetinde jeopolitik rekabete nazaran jeoekonomik mücadelenin ön plana çıktığını ve 2008 küresel krizinden sonra başlayan deglobalizasyon sürecinin bu eğilimi daha da güçlendirdiğini iddia etmektedir. Çalışma büyük güç politikalarında jeopolitik rekabetin yaşanmaya devam ettiğini kabul etmekte, ancak bunun belirli bölgesel alanlarla sınırlı kaldığını öne sürmektedir. Günümüzde Asya Pasifik bölgesi, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri ve Çin arasında büyüyen gerilimler ve askeri kriz risklerini barındıran en kritik jeopolitik fay hatlarından birini temsil etmektedir. Bu tür askeri krizler Pekin tarafından izlenen ve jeoekonomik araçlarla dayanan ‘barışçıl yükselme’ stratejisini riske atma olasılığına sahiptir. Sonuç olarak makale, ekonomik küreselleşmenin tek başına daha az çatışmalı, daha istikrarlı ve kurallara dayalı büyük güç ilişkilerini beraberinde getirmediği fikrine varmaktadır. Bu durum Soğuk Savaş sonrası dönemde ortaya atılan neoliberal varsayım ve beklentilerle çelişmektedir.

Keywords

Globalizasyon Deglobalizasyon Büyük Güç Politikaları Jeoekonomi Çin

References

  • Acharya, A. (2017). After liberal hegemony: The advent of a multiplex world order. Ethics & International Affairs, 31(3), 271-285.
  • Agwu, F.A. (2021). Foreign policy in the age of globalization, populism and nationalism. Singapore: Springer.
  • Al Jazeera. (2023). China issues warning for military exercises in parts of South China Sea. September 28. Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/9/28/china-issues-warning-for-military-exercises-in-parts-of-south-china-sea (September 29, 2023).
  • Almeida, T.F., and Silva, R. L. (2018). The development bank of BRICS. BRICS Law Journal, 5(4), 5-32.
  • Bahar, D. (2017). Trump’s trade policy: protecting American workers at the expense of American consumers. Brookings Commentary. January 6. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/trumps-trade-policy-protecting-american-workers-at-the-expense-of-american-consumers/ (July 1, 2023).
  • Baldwin, D.A. (1980). Interdependence and power: A conceptual analysis. International Organization, 34, 471-506.
  • Becker, M., Fahrion, G., Peters, G. K., Neukirch, R., Pfister, R., Popp, M., Puhl, J., Sandberg, B., Verschwele, L. and
  • Zand, B. (2022). United by danger: How Vladimir Putin brought the west together, Spiegel International, March 4. Retrieved from https://www.spiegel.de/international/world/united-by-danger-how-putin-brought-the-west-together-a-f2b871da-500a-41d4-8e13-db7cdd99567c (September 20, 2023).
  • Beckley, M. (2018). Unrivaled: Why America will remain the world's sole superpower. New York: Cornell University Press.
  • Beeson, M. (2018). Geoeconomics with Chinese characteristics: the BRI and China’s evolving grand strategy. Economic and Political Studies, 6(3), 240-256.
  • Bermann, S. (2021). European strategic autonomy and the US–China rivalry: Can the EU “prefer not to choose”? IAI Papers 21/32. July. Retrieved from https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/iaip2132.pdf (July 1, 2023).
  • Bettiza, G., and Lewis, D. (2020). Authoritarian powers and norm contestation in the liberal international order: Theorizing the Power Politics of Ideas and Identity. Journal of Global Security Studies, 5(4), 559-577.
  • Blackwill, R.D., and Harris, J.M. (2016). War by other means: Geoeconomics and statecraft. Cambrigde: Harvard University Press.
  • Bobo, L. (2017). New order for old triangles? The Russia-China-India matrix. Russie.Nei.Visions, No. 100, IFRI, April. Retrieved from https://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/lo_russia_china_india_triangle_2017.pdf (July 1, 2023).
  • Botto, K. (2021). South Korea beyond Northeast Asia: How Seoul is deepening ties with India and ASEAN. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. October 19. Retrieved from https://carnegieendowment.org/2021/10/19/south-korea-beyond-northeast-asia-how-seoul-is-deepening-ties-with-india-and-asean-pub-85572 (September 20, 2023).
  • Brattberg, E., Le Corre, P., Stronski, P., and de Waal, T. (2021). China’s influence in southeastern central, and eastern europe. Carnegie. October 13. Retrieved from https://carnegieendowment.org/files/202110-Brattberg_et_al_EuropeChina_final.pdf (July 1, 2023).
  • Brooks, S.G., and Wohlforth, W.C. (2023). The myth of multipolarity: American power's staying power. Foreign Affairs, 102(76).
  • Buchholz, K. (2020). U.S.-Chinese trade war: A timeline. Statista. August 17. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/chart/15199/us-chinese-trade-war-escalates/ (September 20, 2023).
  • Chandy, L., and Seidel, B. (2016). Donald Trump and the future of globalization. Brookings Commentary. November 18. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/donald-trump-and-the-future-of-globalization/ (September 20, 2023).
  • Chang, C.-C., and Yang, A.H. (2020). Weaponized interdependence: China's economic statecraft and social penetration against Taiwan. Orbis, 64(2), 312-333.
  • Christensen, T.J. (2020). A modern tragedy? COVID-19 and US-China relations. Brookings Institution. May. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/FP_20200507_covid_us_china_christensen_v2.pdf (July, 1 2023).
  • Cooley, A. (2015). Authoritarianism goes global: Countering democratic norms. Journal of Democracy, 26(3), 49-63.
  • Cooley, A., and Nexon, D. (2020a). Exit from hegemony: The unraveling of the American global order. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Cooley, A., and Nexon, D.H. (2020b). (No) Exit from liberalism? New Perspectives, 28(3), 280-291.
  • Deng, Y., and Moore, T.G. (2004). China views globalization: Toward a new great‐power politics? The Washington Quarterly, 27(3), 115-136.
  • Diesen, G. (2019). The geoeconomics of Russia’s greater eurasia initiative. Asian Politics & Policy, 11(4), 566-585.
  • Diesen, G. (2021). The geoeconomics of the eurasian economic union. In A. Aseeva & J. Górski (Eds.), The law and policy of new Eurasian regionalization: Economic integration, trade, and investment in the post-Soviet and greater Eurasian space (pp. 19-31). Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.
  • Dollar, D. (2023). US protectionism is a flawed strategy. East Asia Forum. June 4. Retrieved from https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2023/06/04/us-protectionism-is-a-flawed-strategy/ (September 20, 2023).
  • Doyle, M.W. (1997). Ways of war and peace: realism, liberalism, and socialism. New York: Norton.
  • Ecologise. (2020). Nine competing geoeconomic projects that will shape Asia’s future. February 13. Retrieved from https://ecologise.in/2020/02/13/nine-competing-geoeconomic-projects-that-will-shape-asias-future/ (September 20, 2023).
  • Economist. (2019). China tries to deepen economic ties with Taiwan yet more. November 7. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/asia/2019/11/07/china-tries-to-deepen-economic-ties-with-taiwan-yet-more (September 20, 2023).
  • Ellis-Petersen, H. (2023). G20: EU and US back trade corridor linking Europe, Middle East and India. The Guardian. September 9. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/sep/09/g20-eu-and-us-back-trade-corridor-linking-europe-middle-east-and-india (September 20, 2023).
  • Engel, R., and Hansen, T. (2022). The United States: A cautious return to internationalism. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. February 17. Retrieved from https://carnegieendowment.org/2022/02/17/united-states-cautious-return-to-internationalism-pub-86314 (July 1, 2023).
  • European Commission. (2023). Trans-European transport network (TEN-T). Retrieved from https://transport.ec.europa.eu/transport-themes/infrastructure-and-investment/trans-european-transport-network-ten-t_en (September 20, 2023).
  • Fravel, M.T., and Glaser, C.L. (2022). How much risk should the United States run in the South China sea? International Security, 47(2), 88-134.
  • Freedom House. (2022). New report: Authoritarian rule challenging democracy as dominant global model. February 24. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/article/new-report-authoritarian-rule-challenging-democracy-dominant-global-model (July 1, 2023).
  • Freiberg, A.L. (2021/22). The growing rivalry between America and China and the future of globalization. Texas National Security Review, 5(1). Retrieved from https://tnsr.org/2022/01/the-growing-rivalry-between-america-and-china-and-the-future-of-globalization/ (July 1, 2023).
  • Freire, M.R. (2022). The quest for status: how the interplay of power, ideas, and regime security shapes Russia’s policy in the post-Soviet spac. In E. Götz & S. N. Macfarlane (Eds.), Russia’s Role in World Politics: Power, Ideas, and Domestic Influences (pp. 87-101): Springer.
  • Gertz, G., and Evers, M. M. (2020). Geoeconomic competition: Will state capitalism win? The Washington Quarterly, 43(2), 117-136.
  • Goddard, S.E., and Nexon, D.H. (2016). The dynamics of global power politics: A framework for analysis. Journal of Global Security Studies, 1(1), 4-18.
  • Green, M.A. (2023). China is the top trading partner to more than 120 Countries. Wilson Center. January 17. Retrieved from https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/china-top-trading-partner-more-120-countries#:~:text=China%20is%20the%20largest%20trading,trader%20with%20Russia%E2%80%94and%20Ukraine (July 1, 2023).
  • Holsti, K.J. (1967). International Politics: A framework for analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  • Horemuž, M. (2015). Economic integration of the post-soviet space and soft power of Russian federation. Politické vedy, 18(2), 8-24.
  • Hornat, J. (2016). The power triangle in the Indian Ocean: China, India and the United States. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 29(2), 425-443.
  • Ikenberry, G.J. (2014). The illusion of geopolitics: The enduring power of the liberal order. Foreign Affairs, 93(3), 80-91.
  • International Crisis Group. (2022). Risky competition: Strengthening U.S.-China crisis management. Asia Report No 324. May 20. Retrieved from https://icg-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/324-us-china-crisis-management.pdf (September 29, 2023).
  • Jackson, N.J. (2014). Trans-regional security organisations and statist multilateralism in Eurasia. Europe-Asia Studies, 66(2), 181-203.
  • Keating, V.C., and Kaczmarska, K. (2019). Conservative soft power: liberal soft power bias and the ‘hidden’ attraction of Russia. Journal of International Relations and Development, 22(1), 1-27.
  • Keohane, R.O. (1989). International institutions and state power: Essays in international relations theory. Boulder: Westview Press.
  • Keohane, R.O. (1990). International liberalism reconsidered. In J. Dunn (Ed.), The economic limits to modern politics (pp. 165-194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Keohane, R.O., and Martin, L.L. (1995). The promise of institutionalist theory. International security, 20(1), 39-51.
  • Keohane, R.O., and Nye Jr., J.S. (2000). Globalization: What's new? What's not? (And So What?). Foreign Policy, 118, Spring, 104-119.
  • Kornprobst, M., and Paul, T.V. (2021). Globalization, deglobalization and the liberal international order. International Affairs, 97(5), 1305-1316.
  • Korolev, A. (2018). Theories of non-balancing and Russia’s foreign policy. Journal of Strategic Studies, 41(6), 887-912.
  • Korolev, A., and Portyakov, V. (2018). China-Russia relations in times of crisis: A neoclassical realist explanation. Asian Perspective, 42(3), 411-437.
  • Leonard, Mark. 2016. “Introduction.” In geo-economics with chinese characteristics: how China’s economic might is reshaping world politics. The World Economic Forum. January. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Geoeconomics_with_Chinese_Characteristics.pdf (July 1, 2023).
  • Li, X. (2020). China’s pursuit of soft power: Norm diffusion as a soft power mechanism. Advances in Applied Sociology, 10(7), 278-297.
  • Lind, J., and Wohlforth, W. C. (2019). The future of the liberal order is conservative. Foreign Affairs, 98(2), 70-81.
  • Lucarelli, S. (2002). Peace and democracy: the rediscovered link the EU, NATO and the European system of liberal-democratic security communities. Research project funded by the NATO Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council Individual Research Fellowships – 2000-2002 Programme. Retrieved from https://www.nato.int/acad/fellow/00-02/Lucarelli's.pdf (July 1, 2023).
  • Lukin, A. (2014). Eurasian integration and the clash of values. Survival, 56(3), 43-60.
  • Luttwak, E.N. (1990). From geopolitics to geo-economics: Logic of conflict, grammar of commerce. The National Interest (20), 17-23.
  • Luttwak, E.N. (1994). The theory and practice of geoeconomics. In A. Clesse, R. Cooper, & Y. Sakamoto (Eds.), The international system after the collapse of the east-west order (pp. 220-236). Dorddrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Maher, R. (2018). Bipolarity and the future of US-China relations. Political Science Quarterly, 133(3), 497-525.
  • Mastro, O.S. (2020). Military confrontation in the South China Sea. Council on Foreign Relations. Contingency Planning Memorandum No. 36. May 21. Retrieved from https://www.cfr.org/report/military-confrontation-south-china-sea (September 20, 2023).
  • Mastro, O.S. (2021). Chinese intentions in the South China Sea. Wilson Center. April 29. Retrieved from https://fsi-live.s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/documents/mastro_paper.pdf (September 20, 2023).
  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). Can China rise peacefully? The National Interest. October 25. Retrieved from https://nationalinterest.org/commentary/can-china-rise-peacefully-10204 (July 1, 2023).
  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (2019). Bound to fail: The rise and fall of the liberal international order. International Security, 43(4), 7-50.
  • Medcalf, R. (2018). Reimagining Asia: from Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific. In G. Rozman & J. C. Liow (Eds.), International relations and Asia’s southern tier: ASEAN, Australia, and India (pp. 9-28). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Meraner, F.-L. R. (2023). China’s anti-access/area-denial strategy. The Defence Horizon Journal. February 9. Retrieved from https://www.thedefencehorizon.org/post/china-a2ad-strategy (July 1, 2023).
  • Milanovic, B. (2019). Capitalism, alone: The future of the system that rules the world. Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2015). Announcement of "partnership for quality infrastructure: investment for Asia's future." May 21. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/page18_000076.html (September 20, 2023).
  • Modelski, G. (2003). Globalization. In D. Held & A. McGrew (Eds.), The global transformations reader: An introduction to the globalization debate (2nd ed., pp. 55-59). Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Morrow, J.D. (1991). Alliances and asymmetry: An alternative to the capability aggregation model of alliances. American Journal of Political Science, 35(4), 904-933.
  • Mousseau, M. (2000). Market prosperity, democratic consolidation, and democratic peace. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 44(4), 472-507.
  • Oliveira, A.C. G. d. (2021). From panda to dragon: An analysis of China’s maritime actions and reactions in the East China Sea and their implications since 2012. Contexto Internacional, 43(1), 147-171.
  • Organski, A.F.K. (1958). World politics. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Owen, J.M. (2021). Two emerging international orders? China and the United States. International Affairs, 97(5), 1415-1431.
  • Öztürk, T. (2022). Deglobalizasyon sürecinin Afrika'daki yansımaları: Güç rekabetinin ticari güvenliğe etkileri. In T. Öztürk & İ. T. Taslı (Eds.), Uuslararası ticaret ve güvenlik: Güncel gelişmeler, bölgesel sorunlar, farklı yaklaşımlar (pp. 111-135). Ankara: Panama.
  • Öztürk, T., and İrfanoğlu, E. (2021). Amerikan dış politikasında jeopolitiğin önemi. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, 21(1), 17-27.
  • Palit, A. (2016). India’s Act East policy and implications for Southeast Asia. Southeast Asian Affairs, 43, 81-92.
  • Pape, R.A. (2005). Soft balancing against the United States. International Security, 30(1), 7-45.
  • Park, S. (2020). Trade conflict between the US and China: What are the impacts on the Chinese economy. International Organisations Research Journal, 15(2), 153-168.
  • Paul, T.V. (2004). Introduction: The enduring axioms of balance of power theory and their contemporary relevance. In T. V. Paul, J. J. Wirtz, and M. Fortmann (Eds.), Balance of power: theory and practice in the 21st century (pp. 1-25). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Paul, T.V. (2005). Soft balancing in the age of US primacy. International Security, 30(1), 46-71.
  • Paul, T.V. (2021). Globalization, deglobalization and reglobalization: adapting liberal international order. International Affairs, 97(5), 1599-1620.
  • Paul, T.V. (2023). The specter of deglobalization. Current History, 122(840), 3-8.
  • Pettis, M. (2021). How Trump’s tariffs really affected the U.S. job market. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. January 28. Retrieved from https://carnegieendowment.org/chinafinancialmarkets/83746 (September 20, 2023).
  • Plekhanov, S.M. (2016). Assisted suicide: Internal and external causes of the Ukrainian Crisis. In J. L. Black and M. Johns (Eds.), The Return of the Cold War: Ukraine, the West and Russia (pp. 3-25). New York: Routledge. Resnick, E.N., and Sworn, H.E. (2023). China and the alliance allergy of rising powers. War on the Rocks, May 30. Retrieved from https://warontherocks.com/2023/05/china-and-the-alliance-allergy-of-rising-powers/ (July 1, 2023).
  • Ripsman, N.M. (2021). Globalization, deglobalization and great power politics. International Affairs, 97(5), 1317–1333.
  • Ripsman, N.M., and Paul, T.V. (2010). Globalization and the national security state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Roberts, A., Moraes, H.C., and Ferguson, V. (2018). The geoeconomic world order. Lawfare. November 19. Retrieved from https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/geoeconomic-world-order (July 1, 2023).
  • Rutland, P. (2023). War in Ukraine is a warning to China of the risks in attacking Taiwan. The Conversation. August 16. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/war-in-ukraine-is-a-warning-to-china-of-the-risks-in-attacking-taiwan-211251 (September 20, 2023).
  • Sarkis, J. (2020). Supply chain sustainability: learning from the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 41(1), 63-73. Schneider-Petsinger, M., Wang, J., Jie, Y., and Crabtree, J. (2019). US–China strategic competition: The quest for global technological leadership. Research Paper, Chatham House, November. Retrieved from https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/CHHJ7480-US-China-Competition-RP-WEB.pdf (July 1, 2023).
  • Scholvin, S., and Wigell, M. (2018). Power politics by economic means: Geoeconomics as an analytical approach and foreign policy practice. Comparative Strategy, 37(1), 73-84.
  • Shehadi, S. (2020). Has Trump destroyed the globalisation dream? Investment Monitor. November 6. Retrieved from https://www.investmentmonitor.ai/features/has-trump-destroyed-the-globalisation-dream/ (September 20, 2023). Shen, S., and Chan, W. (2018). A comparative study of the belt and road initiative and the marshall plan. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), 1-11.
  • Siripurapu, A., & Berman, N. (2023). The contentious U.S.-China trade relationship. Council on Foreign Relations. September 26. Retrieved from https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/contentious-us-china-trade-relationship (September 29, 2023).
  • Smith, J.M. (2019). China’s rise and (under?) balancing in the Indo-Pacific: putting realist theory to the test. War on the Rocks. January 8. Retrieved from https://warontherocks.com/2019/01/chinas-rise-and-under-balancing-in-the-indo-pacific-putting-realist-theory-to-the-test/ (July 1, 2023). Starr, H., and Siverson, R. M. (1990). Alliances and geopolitics. Political Geography Quarterly, 9(3), 232-248.
  • Stiglitz, J.E. (2018). Rethinking globalization in the Trump era: US-China relations. Front. Econ. China, 13(2), 133-146.
  • Sum, N.-L. (2020). The intertwined geopolitics and geoeconomics of hopes/fears: China's triple economic bubbles and the 'one belt one road' imaginary. In J. Agnew (Ed.), The Confines of Territory (pp. 156-180). Routledge.
  • Tammen, R.L., Kugler, J., Lemke, D., Alsharabati, C., Efird, B., Stam, A.C., and Organski, A.F.K. (2000). Power transitions: Strategies for the 21st century. New York: Seven Bridges.
  • Twining, D. (2015). China’s trans-atlantic wedge. Foreign Policy. March 25. Retrieved from https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/03/23/chinas-transatlantic-wedge/ (July 1, 2023). U.S. Department of State. (2017). U.S. support for the new silk road. Retrieved from https://2009-2017.state.gov/p/sca/ci/af/newsilkroad/ (September 20, 2023). Ultan, M.O., and Ornek, S. (2015). Euroscepticism in the European Union. International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 49-57.
  • Vargas-Hernández, J.G. (2023). Relocation strategy of global supply chain and value chain under deglobalization. In U. Akküçük (Ed.), Managing Inflation and Supply Chain Disruptions in the Global Economy (pp. 62-80). Hershey: IGI Global.
  • Walker, C. (2016). The authoritarian threat: The hijacking of "soft power". Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 49-63.
  • Wang, L. (2020). China and the United States in Africa: competition or cooperation? China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 6(1), 123-141.
  • Wigell, M., and Vihma, A. (2016). Geopolitics versus geoeconomics: The case of Russia's geostrategy and its effects on the EU. International Affairs, 92(3), 605-627.
  • Witt, M.A. (2019). China's challenge: Geopolitics, de-globalization, and the future of Chinese business. Management and Organization Review, 15(4), 687-704.
  • Wohlforth, W.C. (1999). The stability of a unipolar world. International Security, 24(1), 5-41.
  • World Bank. (2023). Protectionism is failing to achieve its goals and threatens the future of critical industries. August 29. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2023/08/29/protectionism-is-failing-to-achieve-its-goals-and-threatens-the-future-of-critical-industries (September 20, 2023). Yağcı, M. (2018). Rethinking soft power in light of China’s belt and road initiative. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 15(57), 67-78.
  • Yang, W. (2023). China rolls out carrot-and-stick strategy to influence Taiwan ahead of key election. Voice of America News. September 20. Retrieved from https://www.voanews.com/a/china-rolls-out-carrot-and-stick-strategy-to-influence-taiwan-ahead-of-key-election/7275894.html (September 20, 2023).
  • Ying, F. (2016). How China sees Russia: Beijing and Moscow are close, but not allies. Foreign Affairs, 95(1), 96-105.
  • Zagorcheva, D. (2012). NATO enlargement and security in the Balkans. Journal of Regional Security, 7(1), 7-31.
  • Zakaria, F. (2020). The world is de-globalizing. Trump set the example. Washington Post. January 23. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/the-world-is-de-globalizing-trump-set-the-example/2020/01/23/0c785696-3e23-11ea-8872-5df698785a4e_story.html (September 20, 2023).
  • Zheng, Y. (2004). Globalization and state transformation in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Zongze, R. (2012). An analysis of anti-globalization movements from the perspective of “democratic deficit”. In T. Cai (Ed.), Chinese Perspectives on Globalization and Autonomy (pp. 329-345). Leiden: Brill.

Globalization, Deglobalization, and the US-China Competition: The Balance between Geopolitics and Geoeconomics

Year 2023, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 89 - 113, 17.10.2023

Murat Güneylioğlu

Abstract

This article examines how the globalization and deglobalization processes have affected great power politics in general and the US-China strategic competition in particular. It argues that the post-Cold War globalization process has resulted in the relative rise of geoeconomics vis-à-vis geopolitics in great power politics, and that the deglobalization process after the 2008 global crisis has further reinforced this trend. The article accepts that geopolitical power competition continues to be relevant in great power politics. However, it remains limited to specific regional contexts. Currently, the Asia-Pacific region represents one of the most critical geopolitical fault lines which harbors the risk of growing military tensions and crises between the US and China. Such crises would likely jeopardize Beijing’s ‘peaceful rise’ strategy pursued by geoeconomic means. The article concludes that economic globalization alone does not necessarily bring less conflictual, more stable, and rule-based great power relations, which defies the neoliberal expectations of the early post-Cold War era.

Keywords

Globalization Deglobalization Great Power Politics Geoeconomics China

References

  • Acharya, A. (2017). After liberal hegemony: The advent of a multiplex world order. Ethics & International Affairs, 31(3), 271-285.
  • Agwu, F.A. (2021). Foreign policy in the age of globalization, populism and nationalism. Singapore: Springer.
  • Al Jazeera. (2023). China issues warning for military exercises in parts of South China Sea. September 28. Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/9/28/china-issues-warning-for-military-exercises-in-parts-of-south-china-sea (September 29, 2023).
  • Almeida, T.F., and Silva, R. L. (2018). The development bank of BRICS. BRICS Law Journal, 5(4), 5-32.
  • Bahar, D. (2017). Trump’s trade policy: protecting American workers at the expense of American consumers. Brookings Commentary. January 6. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/trumps-trade-policy-protecting-american-workers-at-the-expense-of-american-consumers/ (July 1, 2023).
  • Baldwin, D.A. (1980). Interdependence and power: A conceptual analysis. International Organization, 34, 471-506.
  • Becker, M., Fahrion, G., Peters, G. K., Neukirch, R., Pfister, R., Popp, M., Puhl, J., Sandberg, B., Verschwele, L. and
  • Zand, B. (2022). United by danger: How Vladimir Putin brought the west together, Spiegel International, March 4. Retrieved from https://www.spiegel.de/international/world/united-by-danger-how-putin-brought-the-west-together-a-f2b871da-500a-41d4-8e13-db7cdd99567c (September 20, 2023).
  • Beckley, M. (2018). Unrivaled: Why America will remain the world's sole superpower. New York: Cornell University Press.
  • Beeson, M. (2018). Geoeconomics with Chinese characteristics: the BRI and China’s evolving grand strategy. Economic and Political Studies, 6(3), 240-256.
  • Bermann, S. (2021). European strategic autonomy and the US–China rivalry: Can the EU “prefer not to choose”? IAI Papers 21/32. July. Retrieved from https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/iaip2132.pdf (July 1, 2023).
  • Bettiza, G., and Lewis, D. (2020). Authoritarian powers and norm contestation in the liberal international order: Theorizing the Power Politics of Ideas and Identity. Journal of Global Security Studies, 5(4), 559-577.
  • Blackwill, R.D., and Harris, J.M. (2016). War by other means: Geoeconomics and statecraft. Cambrigde: Harvard University Press.
  • Bobo, L. (2017). New order for old triangles? The Russia-China-India matrix. Russie.Nei.Visions, No. 100, IFRI, April. Retrieved from https://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/lo_russia_china_india_triangle_2017.pdf (July 1, 2023).
  • Botto, K. (2021). South Korea beyond Northeast Asia: How Seoul is deepening ties with India and ASEAN. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. October 19. Retrieved from https://carnegieendowment.org/2021/10/19/south-korea-beyond-northeast-asia-how-seoul-is-deepening-ties-with-india-and-asean-pub-85572 (September 20, 2023).
  • Brattberg, E., Le Corre, P., Stronski, P., and de Waal, T. (2021). China’s influence in southeastern central, and eastern europe. Carnegie. October 13. Retrieved from https://carnegieendowment.org/files/202110-Brattberg_et_al_EuropeChina_final.pdf (July 1, 2023).
  • Brooks, S.G., and Wohlforth, W.C. (2023). The myth of multipolarity: American power's staying power. Foreign Affairs, 102(76).
  • Buchholz, K. (2020). U.S.-Chinese trade war: A timeline. Statista. August 17. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/chart/15199/us-chinese-trade-war-escalates/ (September 20, 2023).
  • Chandy, L., and Seidel, B. (2016). Donald Trump and the future of globalization. Brookings Commentary. November 18. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/donald-trump-and-the-future-of-globalization/ (September 20, 2023).
  • Chang, C.-C., and Yang, A.H. (2020). Weaponized interdependence: China's economic statecraft and social penetration against Taiwan. Orbis, 64(2), 312-333.
  • Christensen, T.J. (2020). A modern tragedy? COVID-19 and US-China relations. Brookings Institution. May. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/FP_20200507_covid_us_china_christensen_v2.pdf (July, 1 2023).
  • Cooley, A. (2015). Authoritarianism goes global: Countering democratic norms. Journal of Democracy, 26(3), 49-63.
  • Cooley, A., and Nexon, D. (2020a). Exit from hegemony: The unraveling of the American global order. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Cooley, A., and Nexon, D.H. (2020b). (No) Exit from liberalism? New Perspectives, 28(3), 280-291.
  • Deng, Y., and Moore, T.G. (2004). China views globalization: Toward a new great‐power politics? The Washington Quarterly, 27(3), 115-136.
  • Diesen, G. (2019). The geoeconomics of Russia’s greater eurasia initiative. Asian Politics & Policy, 11(4), 566-585.
  • Diesen, G. (2021). The geoeconomics of the eurasian economic union. In A. Aseeva & J. Górski (Eds.), The law and policy of new Eurasian regionalization: Economic integration, trade, and investment in the post-Soviet and greater Eurasian space (pp. 19-31). Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.
  • Dollar, D. (2023). US protectionism is a flawed strategy. East Asia Forum. June 4. Retrieved from https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2023/06/04/us-protectionism-is-a-flawed-strategy/ (September 20, 2023).
  • Doyle, M.W. (1997). Ways of war and peace: realism, liberalism, and socialism. New York: Norton.
  • Ecologise. (2020). Nine competing geoeconomic projects that will shape Asia’s future. February 13. Retrieved from https://ecologise.in/2020/02/13/nine-competing-geoeconomic-projects-that-will-shape-asias-future/ (September 20, 2023).
  • Economist. (2019). China tries to deepen economic ties with Taiwan yet more. November 7. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/asia/2019/11/07/china-tries-to-deepen-economic-ties-with-taiwan-yet-more (September 20, 2023).
  • Ellis-Petersen, H. (2023). G20: EU and US back trade corridor linking Europe, Middle East and India. The Guardian. September 9. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/sep/09/g20-eu-and-us-back-trade-corridor-linking-europe-middle-east-and-india (September 20, 2023).
  • Engel, R., and Hansen, T. (2022). The United States: A cautious return to internationalism. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. February 17. Retrieved from https://carnegieendowment.org/2022/02/17/united-states-cautious-return-to-internationalism-pub-86314 (July 1, 2023).
  • European Commission. (2023). Trans-European transport network (TEN-T). Retrieved from https://transport.ec.europa.eu/transport-themes/infrastructure-and-investment/trans-european-transport-network-ten-t_en (September 20, 2023).
  • Fravel, M.T., and Glaser, C.L. (2022). How much risk should the United States run in the South China sea? International Security, 47(2), 88-134.
  • Freedom House. (2022). New report: Authoritarian rule challenging democracy as dominant global model. February 24. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/article/new-report-authoritarian-rule-challenging-democracy-dominant-global-model (July 1, 2023).
  • Freiberg, A.L. (2021/22). The growing rivalry between America and China and the future of globalization. Texas National Security Review, 5(1). Retrieved from https://tnsr.org/2022/01/the-growing-rivalry-between-america-and-china-and-the-future-of-globalization/ (July 1, 2023).
  • Freire, M.R. (2022). The quest for status: how the interplay of power, ideas, and regime security shapes Russia’s policy in the post-Soviet spac. In E. Götz & S. N. Macfarlane (Eds.), Russia’s Role in World Politics: Power, Ideas, and Domestic Influences (pp. 87-101): Springer.
  • Gertz, G., and Evers, M. M. (2020). Geoeconomic competition: Will state capitalism win? The Washington Quarterly, 43(2), 117-136.
  • Goddard, S.E., and Nexon, D.H. (2016). The dynamics of global power politics: A framework for analysis. Journal of Global Security Studies, 1(1), 4-18.
  • Green, M.A. (2023). China is the top trading partner to more than 120 Countries. Wilson Center. January 17. Retrieved from https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/china-top-trading-partner-more-120-countries#:~:text=China%20is%20the%20largest%20trading,trader%20with%20Russia%E2%80%94and%20Ukraine (July 1, 2023).
  • Holsti, K.J. (1967). International Politics: A framework for analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  • Horemuž, M. (2015). Economic integration of the post-soviet space and soft power of Russian federation. Politické vedy, 18(2), 8-24.
  • Hornat, J. (2016). The power triangle in the Indian Ocean: China, India and the United States. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 29(2), 425-443.
  • Ikenberry, G.J. (2014). The illusion of geopolitics: The enduring power of the liberal order. Foreign Affairs, 93(3), 80-91.
  • International Crisis Group. (2022). Risky competition: Strengthening U.S.-China crisis management. Asia Report No 324. May 20. Retrieved from https://icg-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/324-us-china-crisis-management.pdf (September 29, 2023).
  • Jackson, N.J. (2014). Trans-regional security organisations and statist multilateralism in Eurasia. Europe-Asia Studies, 66(2), 181-203.
  • Keating, V.C., and Kaczmarska, K. (2019). Conservative soft power: liberal soft power bias and the ‘hidden’ attraction of Russia. Journal of International Relations and Development, 22(1), 1-27.
  • Keohane, R.O. (1989). International institutions and state power: Essays in international relations theory. Boulder: Westview Press.
  • Keohane, R.O. (1990). International liberalism reconsidered. In J. Dunn (Ed.), The economic limits to modern politics (pp. 165-194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Keohane, R.O., and Martin, L.L. (1995). The promise of institutionalist theory. International security, 20(1), 39-51.
  • Keohane, R.O., and Nye Jr., J.S. (2000). Globalization: What's new? What's not? (And So What?). Foreign Policy, 118, Spring, 104-119.
  • Kornprobst, M., and Paul, T.V. (2021). Globalization, deglobalization and the liberal international order. International Affairs, 97(5), 1305-1316.
  • Korolev, A. (2018). Theories of non-balancing and Russia’s foreign policy. Journal of Strategic Studies, 41(6), 887-912.
  • Korolev, A., and Portyakov, V. (2018). China-Russia relations in times of crisis: A neoclassical realist explanation. Asian Perspective, 42(3), 411-437.
  • Leonard, Mark. 2016. “Introduction.” In geo-economics with chinese characteristics: how China’s economic might is reshaping world politics. The World Economic Forum. January. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Geoeconomics_with_Chinese_Characteristics.pdf (July 1, 2023).
  • Li, X. (2020). China’s pursuit of soft power: Norm diffusion as a soft power mechanism. Advances in Applied Sociology, 10(7), 278-297.
  • Lind, J., and Wohlforth, W. C. (2019). The future of the liberal order is conservative. Foreign Affairs, 98(2), 70-81.
  • Lucarelli, S. (2002). Peace and democracy: the rediscovered link the EU, NATO and the European system of liberal-democratic security communities. Research project funded by the NATO Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council Individual Research Fellowships – 2000-2002 Programme. Retrieved from https://www.nato.int/acad/fellow/00-02/Lucarelli's.pdf (July 1, 2023).
  • Lukin, A. (2014). Eurasian integration and the clash of values. Survival, 56(3), 43-60.
  • Luttwak, E.N. (1990). From geopolitics to geo-economics: Logic of conflict, grammar of commerce. The National Interest (20), 17-23.
  • Luttwak, E.N. (1994). The theory and practice of geoeconomics. In A. Clesse, R. Cooper, & Y. Sakamoto (Eds.), The international system after the collapse of the east-west order (pp. 220-236). Dorddrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Maher, R. (2018). Bipolarity and the future of US-China relations. Political Science Quarterly, 133(3), 497-525.
  • Mastro, O.S. (2020). Military confrontation in the South China Sea. Council on Foreign Relations. Contingency Planning Memorandum No. 36. May 21. Retrieved from https://www.cfr.org/report/military-confrontation-south-china-sea (September 20, 2023).
  • Mastro, O.S. (2021). Chinese intentions in the South China Sea. Wilson Center. April 29. Retrieved from https://fsi-live.s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/documents/mastro_paper.pdf (September 20, 2023).
  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). Can China rise peacefully? The National Interest. October 25. Retrieved from https://nationalinterest.org/commentary/can-china-rise-peacefully-10204 (July 1, 2023).
  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (2019). Bound to fail: The rise and fall of the liberal international order. International Security, 43(4), 7-50.
  • Medcalf, R. (2018). Reimagining Asia: from Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific. In G. Rozman & J. C. Liow (Eds.), International relations and Asia’s southern tier: ASEAN, Australia, and India (pp. 9-28). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Meraner, F.-L. R. (2023). China’s anti-access/area-denial strategy. The Defence Horizon Journal. February 9. Retrieved from https://www.thedefencehorizon.org/post/china-a2ad-strategy (July 1, 2023).
  • Milanovic, B. (2019). Capitalism, alone: The future of the system that rules the world. Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2015). Announcement of "partnership for quality infrastructure: investment for Asia's future." May 21. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/page18_000076.html (September 20, 2023).
  • Modelski, G. (2003). Globalization. In D. Held & A. McGrew (Eds.), The global transformations reader: An introduction to the globalization debate (2nd ed., pp. 55-59). Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Morrow, J.D. (1991). Alliances and asymmetry: An alternative to the capability aggregation model of alliances. American Journal of Political Science, 35(4), 904-933.
  • Mousseau, M. (2000). Market prosperity, democratic consolidation, and democratic peace. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 44(4), 472-507.
  • Oliveira, A.C. G. d. (2021). From panda to dragon: An analysis of China’s maritime actions and reactions in the East China Sea and their implications since 2012. Contexto Internacional, 43(1), 147-171.
  • Organski, A.F.K. (1958). World politics. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Owen, J.M. (2021). Two emerging international orders? China and the United States. International Affairs, 97(5), 1415-1431.
  • Öztürk, T. (2022). Deglobalizasyon sürecinin Afrika'daki yansımaları: Güç rekabetinin ticari güvenliğe etkileri. In T. Öztürk & İ. T. Taslı (Eds.), Uuslararası ticaret ve güvenlik: Güncel gelişmeler, bölgesel sorunlar, farklı yaklaşımlar (pp. 111-135). Ankara: Panama.
  • Öztürk, T., and İrfanoğlu, E. (2021). Amerikan dış politikasında jeopolitiğin önemi. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, 21(1), 17-27.
  • Palit, A. (2016). India’s Act East policy and implications for Southeast Asia. Southeast Asian Affairs, 43, 81-92.
  • Pape, R.A. (2005). Soft balancing against the United States. International Security, 30(1), 7-45.
  • Park, S. (2020). Trade conflict between the US and China: What are the impacts on the Chinese economy. International Organisations Research Journal, 15(2), 153-168.
  • Paul, T.V. (2004). Introduction: The enduring axioms of balance of power theory and their contemporary relevance. In T. V. Paul, J. J. Wirtz, and M. Fortmann (Eds.), Balance of power: theory and practice in the 21st century (pp. 1-25). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Paul, T.V. (2005). Soft balancing in the age of US primacy. International Security, 30(1), 46-71.
  • Paul, T.V. (2021). Globalization, deglobalization and reglobalization: adapting liberal international order. International Affairs, 97(5), 1599-1620.
  • Paul, T.V. (2023). The specter of deglobalization. Current History, 122(840), 3-8.
  • Pettis, M. (2021). How Trump’s tariffs really affected the U.S. job market. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. January 28. Retrieved from https://carnegieendowment.org/chinafinancialmarkets/83746 (September 20, 2023).
  • Plekhanov, S.M. (2016). Assisted suicide: Internal and external causes of the Ukrainian Crisis. In J. L. Black and M. Johns (Eds.), The Return of the Cold War: Ukraine, the West and Russia (pp. 3-25). New York: Routledge. Resnick, E.N., and Sworn, H.E. (2023). China and the alliance allergy of rising powers. War on the Rocks, May 30. Retrieved from https://warontherocks.com/2023/05/china-and-the-alliance-allergy-of-rising-powers/ (July 1, 2023).
  • Ripsman, N.M. (2021). Globalization, deglobalization and great power politics. International Affairs, 97(5), 1317–1333.
  • Ripsman, N.M., and Paul, T.V. (2010). Globalization and the national security state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Roberts, A., Moraes, H.C., and Ferguson, V. (2018). The geoeconomic world order. Lawfare. November 19. Retrieved from https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/geoeconomic-world-order (July 1, 2023).
  • Rutland, P. (2023). War in Ukraine is a warning to China of the risks in attacking Taiwan. The Conversation. August 16. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/war-in-ukraine-is-a-warning-to-china-of-the-risks-in-attacking-taiwan-211251 (September 20, 2023).
  • Sarkis, J. (2020). Supply chain sustainability: learning from the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 41(1), 63-73. Schneider-Petsinger, M., Wang, J., Jie, Y., and Crabtree, J. (2019). US–China strategic competition: The quest for global technological leadership. Research Paper, Chatham House, November. Retrieved from https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/CHHJ7480-US-China-Competition-RP-WEB.pdf (July 1, 2023).
  • Scholvin, S., and Wigell, M. (2018). Power politics by economic means: Geoeconomics as an analytical approach and foreign policy practice. Comparative Strategy, 37(1), 73-84.
  • Shehadi, S. (2020). Has Trump destroyed the globalisation dream? Investment Monitor. November 6. Retrieved from https://www.investmentmonitor.ai/features/has-trump-destroyed-the-globalisation-dream/ (September 20, 2023). Shen, S., and Chan, W. (2018). A comparative study of the belt and road initiative and the marshall plan. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), 1-11.
  • Siripurapu, A., & Berman, N. (2023). The contentious U.S.-China trade relationship. Council on Foreign Relations. September 26. Retrieved from https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/contentious-us-china-trade-relationship (September 29, 2023).
  • Smith, J.M. (2019). China’s rise and (under?) balancing in the Indo-Pacific: putting realist theory to the test. War on the Rocks. January 8. Retrieved from https://warontherocks.com/2019/01/chinas-rise-and-under-balancing-in-the-indo-pacific-putting-realist-theory-to-the-test/ (July 1, 2023). Starr, H., and Siverson, R. M. (1990). Alliances and geopolitics. Political Geography Quarterly, 9(3), 232-248.
  • Stiglitz, J.E. (2018). Rethinking globalization in the Trump era: US-China relations. Front. Econ. China, 13(2), 133-146.
  • Sum, N.-L. (2020). The intertwined geopolitics and geoeconomics of hopes/fears: China's triple economic bubbles and the 'one belt one road' imaginary. In J. Agnew (Ed.), The Confines of Territory (pp. 156-180). Routledge.
  • Tammen, R.L., Kugler, J., Lemke, D., Alsharabati, C., Efird, B., Stam, A.C., and Organski, A.F.K. (2000). Power transitions: Strategies for the 21st century. New York: Seven Bridges.
  • Twining, D. (2015). China’s trans-atlantic wedge. Foreign Policy. March 25. Retrieved from https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/03/23/chinas-transatlantic-wedge/ (July 1, 2023). U.S. Department of State. (2017). U.S. support for the new silk road. Retrieved from https://2009-2017.state.gov/p/sca/ci/af/newsilkroad/ (September 20, 2023). Ultan, M.O., and Ornek, S. (2015). Euroscepticism in the European Union. International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 49-57.
  • Vargas-Hernández, J.G. (2023). Relocation strategy of global supply chain and value chain under deglobalization. In U. Akküçük (Ed.), Managing Inflation and Supply Chain Disruptions in the Global Economy (pp. 62-80). Hershey: IGI Global.
  • Walker, C. (2016). The authoritarian threat: The hijacking of "soft power". Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 49-63.
  • Wang, L. (2020). China and the United States in Africa: competition or cooperation? China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 6(1), 123-141.
  • Wigell, M., and Vihma, A. (2016). Geopolitics versus geoeconomics: The case of Russia's geostrategy and its effects on the EU. International Affairs, 92(3), 605-627.
  • Witt, M.A. (2019). China's challenge: Geopolitics, de-globalization, and the future of Chinese business. Management and Organization Review, 15(4), 687-704.
  • Wohlforth, W.C. (1999). The stability of a unipolar world. International Security, 24(1), 5-41.
  • World Bank. (2023). Protectionism is failing to achieve its goals and threatens the future of critical industries. August 29. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2023/08/29/protectionism-is-failing-to-achieve-its-goals-and-threatens-the-future-of-critical-industries (September 20, 2023). Yağcı, M. (2018). Rethinking soft power in light of China’s belt and road initiative. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 15(57), 67-78.
  • Yang, W. (2023). China rolls out carrot-and-stick strategy to influence Taiwan ahead of key election. Voice of America News. September 20. Retrieved from https://www.voanews.com/a/china-rolls-out-carrot-and-stick-strategy-to-influence-taiwan-ahead-of-key-election/7275894.html (September 20, 2023).
  • Ying, F. (2016). How China sees Russia: Beijing and Moscow are close, but not allies. Foreign Affairs, 95(1), 96-105.
  • Zagorcheva, D. (2012). NATO enlargement and security in the Balkans. Journal of Regional Security, 7(1), 7-31.
  • Zakaria, F. (2020). The world is de-globalizing. Trump set the example. Washington Post. January 23. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/the-world-is-de-globalizing-trump-set-the-example/2020/01/23/0c785696-3e23-11ea-8872-5df698785a4e_story.html (September 20, 2023).
  • Zheng, Y. (2004). Globalization and state transformation in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Zongze, R. (2012). An analysis of anti-globalization movements from the perspective of “democratic deficit”. In T. Cai (Ed.), Chinese Perspectives on Globalization and Autonomy (pp. 329-345). Leiden: Brill.
There are 114 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Policy and Administration (Other)
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Murat Güneylioğlu 0000-0003-3959-5219

Publication Date October 17, 2023
Submission Date August 8, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023Volume: 8 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Güneylioğlu, M. (2023). Globalization, Deglobalization, and the US-China Competition: The Balance between Geopolitics and Geoeconomics. Türk Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(2), 89-113.