BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

-

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 16 - 30, 03.06.2015

Doç. Dr. Ömer Turunç

Öz

Although strategic management has performance-based approach in global competitive environment, every firms applying strategic management process can’t increase their performance. There is a lot of factor in that issue. In this context, it is believed that the person-organization fit has a moderating role in the relationship between strategic management and organizational performance. So, it is conducted a research in tourism sector to determine the effect of strategic management on organizational performance and to determine whether there is a moderating effect of POfit in this relationship. As a result of this analysis, The results shown there is a relationship between strategic management and organizational performance and also there is a moderating effect of POfit in this relationship

Anahtar Kelimeler

Strategic management organizational performance Person-organization fit Tourism sector Moderating effect

Kaynakça

  • Aggarwal, N. ve Gupta, M. 2006, Marketing Performance Measures: Current Status in Indian Companies, Decision. 33, 1: 47–74.
  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Andrews, Rhys, George A. Boyne, and Richard M. Walker. 2006. Strategy content and organizational performance: An empirical analysis. Public Administration Review 66(1):52–63.
  • Andrews, Rhys, George A. Boyne, Jennifer Law, and Richard M. Walker. 2008, Organizational Strategy, External Regulation and Public Service Performance. Public Administration 86(1): 185–203.
  • Andrews, Rhys, George A. Boyne, Jennifer Law, and Richard M. Walker 2009a, Strategy Formulation, Strategy Content and Performance: An Empirical Analysis. Public Management Review 11(1): 1–22.
  • Andrews, Rhys, George A. Boyne, Jennifer Law, and Richard M. Walker 2009b, Centralization, Organizational Strategy and Public Service Performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Th eory 19(1): 57–80.
  • Andrews, Rhys, George A. Boyne, Jennifer Law, and Richard M. Walker 2008, Strategic Fit and Performance: A Test of the Miles and Snow Model. Paper presented at the Conference on Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process: A Refl ection on the Research University.http://www.cf.ac.uk/carbs/research/groups/clrgr/ research/public/how_public.html [accessed August 26, 2010]. 3–5, Cardiff
  • Andrews, Rhys, George A. Boyne, Kenneth J. Meier, Laurence J. O’Toole Jr., and Richard M. Walker. 2005, Representative bureaucracy, organizational strategy and public service performance: An empirical analysis of English local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(3):489–504.
  • Ashworth, Rachel. 2010, Organizational Culture. In Public Service Improvement: Th eories and Cases, (Eds.) Rachel Ashworth, George A. Boyne, and Tom Entwistle, 98–119. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bakoğlu, R. Ve Özcan, E. D. 2010, İşletme Düzeyinde Strateji Paradokslarının Mintzberg’in On Stratejik Yönetim dergi.marmara.edu.tr:Erişim Tarihi:05.05.2013), 9(34), 57-69. Okulu Açısından
  • Değerlendirilmesi, E-dergi(e
  • Barca, M. 2003, Economic Foundations of Strategic Management. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
  • Barca, M. 2009, Stratejik Yönetim Düşüncesinin Gelişimi, Dosya, Ankara Sanayi odası, ss.34- 52.
  • Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. 1986, The Moderator Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51:1173-1182.
  • Beamon, B.M. 1999, Measuring Supply Chain Performance, International Journal of Operations Production Management. 19, 3:276–277.
  • Boyne, G. A. 2003, Sources Of Public Service İmprovement: A Critical Review And Research Agenda, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 13, 3:367–394.
  • Buckler, B. 1996, A learning process model to achieve continuous improvement and innovation, The Learning Organization, 3,3: 31-40.
  • Campbell, J. P., 1977, On The Nature Of Organizational Effectiveness (Eds.P. Goodman, J.M. Pennings), New Perspectives On Organizational Effectiveness, San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
  • Capon, N., Farley, J.U. ve Hoenig, S. 1990, Determinants of Financial Performance: A Meta- Analysis, Management Science, 36(10): 1143-1159.
  • Cohen, W.M. ve Levinthal, D.A. 1990, Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning And İnnovative, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35:128-152.
  • Çalışkan, A., Akkoç, İ. ve Turunç, Ö., 2011, Örgütsel Performansın Artırılmasında Motivasyonel Davranışların Rolü: Yenilikçilik Ve Girişimciliğin Aracılık Rolü, SDÜ İİBF Dergisi, 16(3): 363-403.
  • Da Silva, N., Hutcheson, J. Ve Wahl, G. D. 2010, Organizational Strategy AND Employee Outcomes: A Person–Organization Fit Perspective, The Journal OF Psychology, 144(2), 145–161
  • Daft, R.L. 2000, Organization Theory And Design, 7th Edition, Mason: South-Western College Publishing,.
  • Ekehammer, B. 1974, Interactionismin personality from a historical perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 81: 1026-1048.
  • Eusebio, R., Andreu J.L., Belbeze M.P.L. 2006, Measures of marketing performance: A comparative study from Spain, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 18, 2:145–155.
  • Haber, S. ve Reichel, A., 2005, Identifying Performance Measures Of Small Ventures — The Case Of The Tourism Industry, Journal of Small Business Management, 43, 3:257–286.
  • Hoskisson, R.E., Hitt, M.A., Wan,W.P., Yiu, D. 1999, Theory And Research in Strategic Management: Swings of A Pendulum. Journal of Management, Vol. 25, No. 3:417–456
  • Joreskog, K. G. & Sorbom D. 1993, Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With The SIMPLIS Command Language. Chicago, IL: Scientific International Software.
  • Kline, R. B. 1998, Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Koseoglu, M. A., M. Barca ve K. Karayormuk, 2009, A Study on The Causes Of Strategies Failing To Success, Journal of Global Strategic Management, 3(2). 06:77-91
  • Kristof, A. L. 1996, Person-organisation fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, s. 1–49.
  • Lewin, K. 193,. A dynamic theory of personality: Selected papers of Kurt Lewin. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Lumpkin, G.T., Lichtenstein B.B., 2005, The role of organizational learning in the opportunity recognition process, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 29, 4:451–472.
  • Meier, Kenneth J., Laurence J. O’Toole, Jr., George A. Boyne, and Richard M. Walker. 2007, Strategic Management and the Performance of Public Organizations: Testing Venerable Ideas against Recent Th eories. Journal of Public Administration Research and Th eory 17(3): 357–77.
  • Meier, Kenneth J., Laurence J. O’Toole, Jr., George A. Boyne, Richard M. Walker, and Rhys Andrews. 2010, Alignment and Results: Testing the Interaction Eff ects of Strategy, Structure, and Environment from Miles and Snow. Administration & Society 42(2): 160–92.
  • Miles, Raymond E., and Charles C. Snow. 1978, Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Mintzberg, H. & Ahlstrand, B, Lampel J. 1998, Strategy Safari. London: Prentice Hall.
  • Moradi, H. 2012, The Role of Strategic Planning and Management in Increasing Organizational Development and Productivity. European Journal of Social Sciences, 30,1:70-77
  • Murray,H. A. 1951, Toward a classification of interaction. In T. Parsons ve E. A. Shils (Eds.). Toward a general theory of action: 434-464. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S.,MacKee, D. O. &MacMurrian, R. 1997, An investigation into the antecedents of organizational citizenship behaviors in a personal selling context. Journal ofMarketing, 61:85−98.
  • Nixon,B.,Burns, J. 2012, The Paradox Of Strategic Management Accounting. Management Accounting Research, 23:229-244
  • Parsons, F. 1909, Choosing a vocation. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin
  • Peng J., S. Chiu 2010, An IntegrativeModel Linking Feedback Environment and Organizational Citizenship Behavior , The Journal of Social Psychology, 150,6:582–607
  • Pervin, L. A. 1968, Persons, situations, interactions: The history of a controversy and a discussion of theoretical models. Academy ofManagement Review, 14,3:350–360.
  • Porter,M.E.2008, 'The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy', Harvard Business Review,January: 79-93
  • Sekaran, U. 1992, Research Methods for Business, Canada: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  • Suliman, A. M. T. 2001, Are we Ready to Innovate? Work Climate-Readiness to Innovate Relationship: The Case of Jordan, Creativity and Innovation Management, 10(1):49-59.
  • Tseng, Y.F., Lee, T.Z. 2009, Comparing Appropriate Decision Support of Human Resource Practices on Organizational Performance with DEA/AHP model, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 6548– 6558.
  • Turunç, Ö. 2006, Bilgi Teknolojileri Kullanımının İşletmelerin Örgütsel Performansına Etkisi Hizmet Sektöründe Bir Araştırma, (Basılmamış Doktora Tezi), Isparta, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • Turunç, Ö. ve Çelik, M. 2012, İş Tatmini -Kişi-Örgüt Uyumu Ve Amire Güven- Kişi-Örgüt Uyumu İlişkisinde Dağıtım Adaletinin Düzenleyici Rolü İŞGÜÇ Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 14,2,
  • Ülgen, H. Ve Mirze, K. 2010, İşletmelerde Stratejik Yönetim, Beta.
  • Vilela, B. B., Varela Gonzalez, J. A., & Ferrin,F. F. 2008, Person-organization fit, OCB and performance appraisal: Evidence from matched supervisor-salesperson data set in a Spanish context. Industrial Marketing Management. 37:1005-1019.
  • Walker, Richard M., George A. Boyne, and Gene A. Brewer, (Eds.) 2010, Public Management and Performance: Research Directions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

STRATEJİK YÖNETİM ÖRGÜTSEL PERFORMANS İLİŞKİSİNDE KİŞİ-ÖRGÜT UYUMUNUN ROLÜ

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 16 - 30, 03.06.2015

Doç. Dr. Ömer Turunç

Öz

ÖZET: Küresel rekabet ortamında stratejik yönetim performans temelli bir yaklaşım olmasına rağmen stratejik yönetim süreçlerini uygulayan her işletme örgütsel performansını artıramamakta ya da sürdürememektedir. Bu sorunun temelinde pek çok faktör bulunmaktadır. Bu çerçevede kişi- örgüt uyumunun stratejik yönetim – örgütsel performans ilişkisinde düzenleyici etkilerinin olduğu düşünülmektedir. Bu kapsamda; turizm sektöründe stratejik yönetim uygulamalarının çalışanların algıladıkları örgütsel performans üzerindeki etkilerinin belirlenmesi ve bu ilişkide kişi - örgüt uyumunun düzenleyici rolünün olup olmadığını belirlenmesine yönelik ampirik bir çalışma yapılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda stratejik yönetim ile örgütsel performans arasında bir ilişki olduğu ve kişi örgüt uyumunun bu ilişkide düzenleyici rol üstlendiği belirlenmiştir.

 

Anahtar Kelimeler: Stratejik yönetim, Örgütsel Performans, Kişi-örgüt uyumu, Turizm sektörü, Düzenleyici etki.

Jel Sınıflandırması: M10, M12

Anahtar Kelimeler

Stratejik yönetim Örgütsel Performans Kişi-örgüt uyumu Turizm sektörü Düzenleyici etki

Kaynakça

  • Aggarwal, N. ve Gupta, M. 2006, Marketing Performance Measures: Current Status in Indian Companies, Decision. 33, 1: 47–74.
  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Andrews, Rhys, George A. Boyne, and Richard M. Walker. 2006. Strategy content and organizational performance: An empirical analysis. Public Administration Review 66(1):52–63.
  • Andrews, Rhys, George A. Boyne, Jennifer Law, and Richard M. Walker. 2008, Organizational Strategy, External Regulation and Public Service Performance. Public Administration 86(1): 185–203.
  • Andrews, Rhys, George A. Boyne, Jennifer Law, and Richard M. Walker 2009a, Strategy Formulation, Strategy Content and Performance: An Empirical Analysis. Public Management Review 11(1): 1–22.
  • Andrews, Rhys, George A. Boyne, Jennifer Law, and Richard M. Walker 2009b, Centralization, Organizational Strategy and Public Service Performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Th eory 19(1): 57–80.
  • Andrews, Rhys, George A. Boyne, Jennifer Law, and Richard M. Walker 2008, Strategic Fit and Performance: A Test of the Miles and Snow Model. Paper presented at the Conference on Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process: A Refl ection on the Research University.http://www.cf.ac.uk/carbs/research/groups/clrgr/ research/public/how_public.html [accessed August 26, 2010]. 3–5, Cardiff
  • Andrews, Rhys, George A. Boyne, Kenneth J. Meier, Laurence J. O’Toole Jr., and Richard M. Walker. 2005, Representative bureaucracy, organizational strategy and public service performance: An empirical analysis of English local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(3):489–504.
  • Ashworth, Rachel. 2010, Organizational Culture. In Public Service Improvement: Th eories and Cases, (Eds.) Rachel Ashworth, George A. Boyne, and Tom Entwistle, 98–119. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bakoğlu, R. Ve Özcan, E. D. 2010, İşletme Düzeyinde Strateji Paradokslarının Mintzberg’in On Stratejik Yönetim dergi.marmara.edu.tr:Erişim Tarihi:05.05.2013), 9(34), 57-69. Okulu Açısından
  • Değerlendirilmesi, E-dergi(e
  • Barca, M. 2003, Economic Foundations of Strategic Management. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
  • Barca, M. 2009, Stratejik Yönetim Düşüncesinin Gelişimi, Dosya, Ankara Sanayi odası, ss.34- 52.
  • Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. 1986, The Moderator Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51:1173-1182.
  • Beamon, B.M. 1999, Measuring Supply Chain Performance, International Journal of Operations Production Management. 19, 3:276–277.
  • Boyne, G. A. 2003, Sources Of Public Service İmprovement: A Critical Review And Research Agenda, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 13, 3:367–394.
  • Buckler, B. 1996, A learning process model to achieve continuous improvement and innovation, The Learning Organization, 3,3: 31-40.
  • Campbell, J. P., 1977, On The Nature Of Organizational Effectiveness (Eds.P. Goodman, J.M. Pennings), New Perspectives On Organizational Effectiveness, San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
  • Capon, N., Farley, J.U. ve Hoenig, S. 1990, Determinants of Financial Performance: A Meta- Analysis, Management Science, 36(10): 1143-1159.
  • Cohen, W.M. ve Levinthal, D.A. 1990, Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning And İnnovative, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35:128-152.
  • Çalışkan, A., Akkoç, İ. ve Turunç, Ö., 2011, Örgütsel Performansın Artırılmasında Motivasyonel Davranışların Rolü: Yenilikçilik Ve Girişimciliğin Aracılık Rolü, SDÜ İİBF Dergisi, 16(3): 363-403.
  • Da Silva, N., Hutcheson, J. Ve Wahl, G. D. 2010, Organizational Strategy AND Employee Outcomes: A Person–Organization Fit Perspective, The Journal OF Psychology, 144(2), 145–161
  • Daft, R.L. 2000, Organization Theory And Design, 7th Edition, Mason: South-Western College Publishing,.
  • Ekehammer, B. 1974, Interactionismin personality from a historical perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 81: 1026-1048.
  • Eusebio, R., Andreu J.L., Belbeze M.P.L. 2006, Measures of marketing performance: A comparative study from Spain, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 18, 2:145–155.
  • Haber, S. ve Reichel, A., 2005, Identifying Performance Measures Of Small Ventures — The Case Of The Tourism Industry, Journal of Small Business Management, 43, 3:257–286.
  • Hoskisson, R.E., Hitt, M.A., Wan,W.P., Yiu, D. 1999, Theory And Research in Strategic Management: Swings of A Pendulum. Journal of Management, Vol. 25, No. 3:417–456
  • Joreskog, K. G. & Sorbom D. 1993, Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With The SIMPLIS Command Language. Chicago, IL: Scientific International Software.
  • Kline, R. B. 1998, Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Koseoglu, M. A., M. Barca ve K. Karayormuk, 2009, A Study on The Causes Of Strategies Failing To Success, Journal of Global Strategic Management, 3(2). 06:77-91
  • Kristof, A. L. 1996, Person-organisation fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, s. 1–49.
  • Lewin, K. 193,. A dynamic theory of personality: Selected papers of Kurt Lewin. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Lumpkin, G.T., Lichtenstein B.B., 2005, The role of organizational learning in the opportunity recognition process, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 29, 4:451–472.
  • Meier, Kenneth J., Laurence J. O’Toole, Jr., George A. Boyne, and Richard M. Walker. 2007, Strategic Management and the Performance of Public Organizations: Testing Venerable Ideas against Recent Th eories. Journal of Public Administration Research and Th eory 17(3): 357–77.
  • Meier, Kenneth J., Laurence J. O’Toole, Jr., George A. Boyne, Richard M. Walker, and Rhys Andrews. 2010, Alignment and Results: Testing the Interaction Eff ects of Strategy, Structure, and Environment from Miles and Snow. Administration & Society 42(2): 160–92.
  • Miles, Raymond E., and Charles C. Snow. 1978, Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Mintzberg, H. & Ahlstrand, B, Lampel J. 1998, Strategy Safari. London: Prentice Hall.
  • Moradi, H. 2012, The Role of Strategic Planning and Management in Increasing Organizational Development and Productivity. European Journal of Social Sciences, 30,1:70-77
  • Murray,H. A. 1951, Toward a classification of interaction. In T. Parsons ve E. A. Shils (Eds.). Toward a general theory of action: 434-464. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S.,MacKee, D. O. &MacMurrian, R. 1997, An investigation into the antecedents of organizational citizenship behaviors in a personal selling context. Journal ofMarketing, 61:85−98.
  • Nixon,B.,Burns, J. 2012, The Paradox Of Strategic Management Accounting. Management Accounting Research, 23:229-244
  • Parsons, F. 1909, Choosing a vocation. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin
  • Peng J., S. Chiu 2010, An IntegrativeModel Linking Feedback Environment and Organizational Citizenship Behavior , The Journal of Social Psychology, 150,6:582–607
  • Pervin, L. A. 1968, Persons, situations, interactions: The history of a controversy and a discussion of theoretical models. Academy ofManagement Review, 14,3:350–360.
  • Porter,M.E.2008, 'The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy', Harvard Business Review,January: 79-93
  • Sekaran, U. 1992, Research Methods for Business, Canada: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  • Suliman, A. M. T. 2001, Are we Ready to Innovate? Work Climate-Readiness to Innovate Relationship: The Case of Jordan, Creativity and Innovation Management, 10(1):49-59.
  • Tseng, Y.F., Lee, T.Z. 2009, Comparing Appropriate Decision Support of Human Resource Practices on Organizational Performance with DEA/AHP model, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 6548– 6558.
  • Turunç, Ö. 2006, Bilgi Teknolojileri Kullanımının İşletmelerin Örgütsel Performansına Etkisi Hizmet Sektöründe Bir Araştırma, (Basılmamış Doktora Tezi), Isparta, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • Turunç, Ö. ve Çelik, M. 2012, İş Tatmini -Kişi-Örgüt Uyumu Ve Amire Güven- Kişi-Örgüt Uyumu İlişkisinde Dağıtım Adaletinin Düzenleyici Rolü İŞGÜÇ Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 14,2,
  • Ülgen, H. Ve Mirze, K. 2010, İşletmelerde Stratejik Yönetim, Beta.
  • Vilela, B. B., Varela Gonzalez, J. A., & Ferrin,F. F. 2008, Person-organization fit, OCB and performance appraisal: Evidence from matched supervisor-salesperson data set in a Spanish context. Industrial Marketing Management. 37:1005-1019.
  • Walker, Richard M., George A. Boyne, and Gene A. Brewer, (Eds.) 2010, Public Management and Performance: Research Directions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Toplam 53 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Doç. Dr. Ömer Turunç

Yayımlanma Tarihi 3 Haziran 2015
Gönderilme Tarihi 3 Haziran 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2015 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Turunç, D. D. Ö. (2015). STRATEJİK YÖNETİM ÖRGÜTSEL PERFORMANS İLİŞKİSİNDE KİŞİ-ÖRGÜT UYUMUNUN ROLÜ. Uluslararası İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 1(1), 16-30.

ARAŞTIRMA VE YAYIN ETİĞİNE İLİŞKİN DERGİ POLİTİKAMIZ

Etik Kurul izni gerektiren çalışmalar (anket ya da ölçek uygulamayı gerektiren, görüşme ve gözlem içeren; doküman, resim, anket vb. diğerleri tarafından geliştirilen ve kullanım izni gerektiren çalışmalar) için etik kurullardan ya da komisyonlardan gerekli izinlerin araştırma yapılmadan önce alınmış olması, bunların makale içeriğinde belirtilmesi ya da ek olarak sunulması gerekmektedir. Bu izinlerin olmaması durumunda yayın ön inceleme safhasında yazara iade edilir.  

Diğer yandan, Araştırma Makalelerinde verisi 2020 yılından önce toplanmış makaleler için ETİK KURUL İZNİ istenmemektedir. Ancak yine bu makalelerde de yöntem kısmında verilerin toplanma tarihlerine ilişkin bilgilere yer verilmesi gerekmektedir.

Hakem değerlendirmelerinde olan araştırmalara ilişkin ham verilerin hakemler tarafından talep edildiğinde sunulması şarttır. Verilerin makalenin yayımı sonrasında da gerektiğinde sağlanması zorunludur. 

MAKALE BENZERLİK RAPORU VE BENZERLİK ORANI HAKKINDA DERGİ POLİTİKAMIZ


Aday makaleler akademik intihal engelleme programından (Örneğin: Turnitin, Ithenticate, intihal.net vb.) alınmış orijinallik raporu ile birlikte gönderilmelidir. Bu oran %20'ye kadar kabul edilmektedir. %20'nin üzerinde benzerlik oranı olan çalışmalar ön kontrol aşamasında iade edilecektir.

ISSN: 2149 - 5823