Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

RESMİ KALKINMA YARDIMI (RKY) VE RESMİ KALKINMA YARDIMININ DEMOKRASİNİN DESTEKLENMESİ VE EGEMENLİK İLE İLİŞKİSİ

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2, 47 - 56, 28.10.2016

Bilal Çıplak

Öz

Devletler artan bir biçimde Resmi Kalkınma Yardımlarını (RKY) kendi
menfaatlerini savunmak için diğer devletleri etkilemek adına kullanmaktadırlar.
Fakat, RKY anlam açısından ve praktikte, demokrasinin desteklenmesi (rejim
ihracı) ve egemenlik normları ile benzer bir şekilde kullanılmaktadır. Bu
yüzden, bu makale, öncelikle yukarıda bahsi geçen kavramları güzel bir şekilde
açıkladıktan sonra bu konseptlerin birbirileri ile olan ilişkilerini
anlatmaktadır. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Resmi Kalkınma Yardımı (RKY) Demokrasi Egemenlik

Kaynakça

  • Aviles, W. (2012). The political economy of low-intensity democracy: Colombia and Honduras and Venezuela. In Cox, Ronald W., Corporate Power and Globalization in US Foreign Policy (Routledge Press).
  • Carothers, T. (1996). Assessing democracy assistance: The case of Romania. Washington D.C.: Carnegie Endowment Group.
  • Carothers, T. (1999). Aiding democracy abroad: Learning curve. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Publications.
  • Carothers, T. (2010). Elusive Synthesis, Journal of Democracy, 12-26.
  • Çıplak, B. (2014). Democracy promotion and Turkey. ProQuest ETD Collection for FIU. Paper AAI3644757. [Available online at: http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/dissertations/AAI3644757] Retrieved online at: 10.08.2016.
  • Çıplak, B. and Ahmet K. (2016). The militarization of the Turkey’s democracy promotion policy in the Arab Middle East (AME). International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 5(10), 63-75.
  • Czempiel, E. (1996). Kant’s theorem. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 3(1), 79–101.
  • Dalacoura, K. (2010). US foreign policy and democracy promotion in the Middle East: Theoretical perspectives and policy recommendations. Ortadoğu Etütleri, 57-76.
  • Global humanitarian assistance (2014). [ Available online at: http://www.globalhumanitarianassistance.org/countryprofile/turkey] Retrieved online at: 27.09.2016.
  • Huntington, S.(1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Hynes, W and Simon S. (2013). The evolution of official development assistance: Achievements, criticisms and a way forward. OECD Development Co-operation Working Papers, No. 12, OECD Publishing. [Available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k3v1dv3f024-en] Retrieved online at: 21.09.2016.
  • Karakas, C. (2010). Democracy promotion or demotion? US and German reactions to the rise of political Islam in Turkey. Standing Group on International Relations.
  • Kulaklikaya, M. and Rahman N. (2010). Turkey as a new player in development cooperation. Insight Turkey, 131-145.
  • Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social prerequisites of democracy. The American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69-105.
  • Lobell, S. E, N. M. Ripsman and J. W. Taliaferro (2009). Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • McFaul, M. (2004-2005). Democracy promotion as a world value. The Washington Quarterly, 147-163.
  • McFaul, M. (2007). Ukraine imports democracy: External influences in the Orange Revolution. International Security, 45-83.
  • Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organizations, 51(4), 513-553.
  • OECD (2008). Is it ODA?. [Available online at: http://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/34086975.pdf] Retrieved online at: 14.09.2016.
  • OECD (2015).
  • Robinson, W. I. (1996). Promoting polyarchy: Globalization, the US intervention, and hegemony. Cambridge University Press.
  • Schraeder, P. J. (2003). The state of the art in international democracy promotion: Results of a joint European-North American research network. Democratization, 20(2), 21-44.
  • Schweller, R. L. (2000). US democracy promotion: Realist reflections, in: Cox et al. 41-62.
  • Stanly, T. (2013). [Available online at: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100224748/egyptcoup-the-us-expressed-concern-about-morsi-yet-it-g.] Retrieved online at: 07.09.2016.
  • So, A. (1990). Social change and development: modernization, dependency, and world system theories. California: Sage Publications.
  • TIKA (2012). TIKA Development Report.
  • Youngs, R. (2002). The EU and democracy promotion in the mediterranean: A new or disingenuous strategy?. Paper Presented at 'The EU and civil society development in North Africa' International Seminar, Rabat.

OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE (ODA) AND ITS RELATION WITH DEMOCRACY PROMOTION AND SOVEREIGNTY

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2, 47 - 56, 28.10.2016

Bilal Çıplak

Öz

Official
Development Assistance (ODA) has become a way that states exert their influence
over the other states. However, the concept of the ODA has been a point of
debate, particularly in relation with democracy promotion and sovereignty. This
paper tries to clarify each concept and explain their relations with each
other.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Official Development Assistance (ODA) Democracy Promotion Sovereignty

Kaynakça

  • Aviles, W. (2012). The political economy of low-intensity democracy: Colombia and Honduras and Venezuela. In Cox, Ronald W., Corporate Power and Globalization in US Foreign Policy (Routledge Press).
  • Carothers, T. (1996). Assessing democracy assistance: The case of Romania. Washington D.C.: Carnegie Endowment Group.
  • Carothers, T. (1999). Aiding democracy abroad: Learning curve. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Publications.
  • Carothers, T. (2010). Elusive Synthesis, Journal of Democracy, 12-26.
  • Çıplak, B. (2014). Democracy promotion and Turkey. ProQuest ETD Collection for FIU. Paper AAI3644757. [Available online at: http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/dissertations/AAI3644757] Retrieved online at: 10.08.2016.
  • Çıplak, B. and Ahmet K. (2016). The militarization of the Turkey’s democracy promotion policy in the Arab Middle East (AME). International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 5(10), 63-75.
  • Czempiel, E. (1996). Kant’s theorem. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 3(1), 79–101.
  • Dalacoura, K. (2010). US foreign policy and democracy promotion in the Middle East: Theoretical perspectives and policy recommendations. Ortadoğu Etütleri, 57-76.
  • Global humanitarian assistance (2014). [ Available online at: http://www.globalhumanitarianassistance.org/countryprofile/turkey] Retrieved online at: 27.09.2016.
  • Huntington, S.(1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Hynes, W and Simon S. (2013). The evolution of official development assistance: Achievements, criticisms and a way forward. OECD Development Co-operation Working Papers, No. 12, OECD Publishing. [Available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k3v1dv3f024-en] Retrieved online at: 21.09.2016.
  • Karakas, C. (2010). Democracy promotion or demotion? US and German reactions to the rise of political Islam in Turkey. Standing Group on International Relations.
  • Kulaklikaya, M. and Rahman N. (2010). Turkey as a new player in development cooperation. Insight Turkey, 131-145.
  • Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social prerequisites of democracy. The American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69-105.
  • Lobell, S. E, N. M. Ripsman and J. W. Taliaferro (2009). Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • McFaul, M. (2004-2005). Democracy promotion as a world value. The Washington Quarterly, 147-163.
  • McFaul, M. (2007). Ukraine imports democracy: External influences in the Orange Revolution. International Security, 45-83.
  • Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organizations, 51(4), 513-553.
  • OECD (2008). Is it ODA?. [Available online at: http://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/34086975.pdf] Retrieved online at: 14.09.2016.
  • OECD (2015).
  • Robinson, W. I. (1996). Promoting polyarchy: Globalization, the US intervention, and hegemony. Cambridge University Press.
  • Schraeder, P. J. (2003). The state of the art in international democracy promotion: Results of a joint European-North American research network. Democratization, 20(2), 21-44.
  • Schweller, R. L. (2000). US democracy promotion: Realist reflections, in: Cox et al. 41-62.
  • Stanly, T. (2013). [Available online at: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100224748/egyptcoup-the-us-expressed-concern-about-morsi-yet-it-g.] Retrieved online at: 07.09.2016.
  • So, A. (1990). Social change and development: modernization, dependency, and world system theories. California: Sage Publications.
  • TIKA (2012). TIKA Development Report.
  • Youngs, R. (2002). The EU and democracy promotion in the mediterranean: A new or disingenuous strategy?. Paper Presented at 'The EU and civil society development in North Africa' International Seminar, Rabat.
Toplam 27 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Bilal Çıplak

Yayımlanma Tarihi 28 Ekim 2016
Gönderilme Tarihi 23 Ekim 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Çıplak, B. (2016). RESMİ KALKINMA YARDIMI (RKY) VE RESMİ KALKINMA YARDIMININ DEMOKRASİNİN DESTEKLENMESİ VE EGEMENLİK İLE İLİŞKİSİ. Türk Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 47-56.