Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞI, AÇIK İNOVASYON VE FİRMA PERFORMANSI İLİŞKİSİ

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 18 - 37, 09.08.2022

Salih Zeki İmamoğlu Hülya Türkcan Özlem Birgülen

https://doi.org/10.18825/iremjournal.1061261

Öz

Firmanın sahip olduğu insan kaynağı, onun çıktıları için temel belirleyici faktördür. Bu doğrultuda, firma yararı için gönüllü olarak ekstra çaba sarf eden çalışanlar başarılı çıktılar elde etmek için önemlidir. Küresel rekabet şartlarında firmanın kaynak kısıtını ortadan kaldıran açık inovasyon firmanın başarılı olmasını sağlarken, iletişim, işbirliği ve koordinasyona dayalı olduğundan açık inovasyonun başarılı yürütülmesi de çalışanların ekstra çabalarıyla mümkündür. Buradan hareketle bu çalışmanın amacı, örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı, açık inovasyon ve firma performansı arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmaktır. Araştırma kapsamında, Kocaeli bölgesindeki imalat sanayinde faaliyette bulunan 188 firmadan anket yoluyla veri toplanmıştır. Toplanan veriler AMOS istatistiksel paket programında analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre, örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı açık inovasyonu ve açık inovasyon da firma performansını pozitif yönde etkilemektedir. Ayrıca, örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ve firma performansı ilişkisinde açık inovasyonun tam ara değişken rolü olduğu bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Açık İnovasyon Firma Performansı

Kaynakça

  • Aggarwal, A., & Singh, R. 2016. Exploring the nomological network of organizational citizenship behavior: A review of dimensions, antecedents and consequences. The IUP Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(3): 16-39.
  • Antikainen, M., Mäkipää, M., & Ahonen, M. 2010. Motivating and supporting collaboration in open innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(1): 100-119.
  • Barbosa, A. P. P. L., Salerno, M. S., Brasil, V. C., & de Souza Nascimento, P. T. 2020. Coordination approaches to foster open innovation R&D projects performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 58: 101603.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 1173-1182.
  • Bierly III, P. E., Damanpour, F., & Santoro, M. D. 2009. The application of external knowledge: Organizational conditions for exploration and exploitation. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3): 481-509.
  • Bigliardi, B., Ferraro, G., Filippelli, S., & Galati, F. 2020. The influence of open innovation on firm performance. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 12: 1-14.
  • Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., & Moedas, C. 2018. Open innovation: Research, practices, and policies. California Management Review, 60(2): 5-16.
  • Bowler, W. M., Paul, J. B., & Halbesleben, J. R. 2019. LMX and attributions of organizational citizenship behavior motives: When is citizenship perceived as brownnosing? Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(2): 139-152.
  • Byrne, B. M. 2016. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd Edition). New York: Routledge.
  • Chesbrough, H. 2004. Managing open innovation. Research-Technology Management, 47(1): 23-26.
  • Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. 2014. New frontiers in open innovation. UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Chesbrough, H.W. 2003. The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3): 35-41.
  • Choi, Y., & Yu, Y. 2014. The influence of perceived corporate sustainability practices on employees and organizational performance. Sustainability, 6(1): 348-364.
  • Crema, M., Verbano, C., & Venturini, K. 2014. Linking strategy with open innovation and performance in SMEs. Measuring Business Excellence, 18(2):14-27.
  • Çimen, K., Pekel, A., Atasoy, T., & Yanar, Ş. 2017. The relationship between organizational creativity levels and problem-solving abilities of sport Istanbul managers. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 3 (11): 318-328.
  • Ellinger, A. D., Ellinger, A. E., Yang, B., & Howton, S. W. 2002. The relationship between the learning organization concept and firms' financial performance: An empirical assessment. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13(1): 5-22.
  • Erdoğan, P., & Bedük, A. 2013. Örgütsel Sinizm ile Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Arasındaki İlişki: Sağlık Sektöründe Bir Araştırma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Teknik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1(6): 17-36.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39-50.
  • Goertzel, B., Goertzel, T., & Goertzel, Z. 2017. The global brain and the emerging economy of abundance: Mutualism, open collaboration, exchange networks and the automated commons. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114: 65-73.
  • Göktaş Kulualp, H., & Sarı, Ö. 2019. Destekleme davranışı ve sosyal değişim teorisi kapsamında kırsal turizmin etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(1): 643-666.
  • Gürbüz, S., Ayhan, Ö., & Sert, M. 2016. Örgütsel adalet ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ilişkisi: Türkiye’de yapılan araştırmalar üzerinden bir meta analizi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 31(77): 61-75.
  • Karaca, E., & Özmen, A. 2018. Örgütsel adaletin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışına etkisi: Kamu ve özel sektörde karşılaştırmalı bir araştırma. Kastamonu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(1): 7- 30.
  • Karaman, A., & Aylan, S. 2012. Örgütsel vatandaşlık. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(1): 35-48.
  • Koys, D. J. 2001. The effects of employee satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, and turnover on organizational effectiveness: A unit‐level, longitudinal study. Personnel Psychology, 54(1): 101-114.
  • Langton, N., Robbins, S.P., & Judge, T.A. 2019. Organizational behaviour: Concepts, controversies, applications (Eighth Canadian Edition). Toronto: Pearson Education.
  • Lim, B. T.H., & Loosemore, M. 2017. How socially responsible is construction business in Australia and New Zealand? Procedia Engineering, 180: 531-540.
  • Martin, R., Guillaume, Y., Thomas, G., Lee, A., & Epitropaki, O. 2016. Leader–member exchange (LMX) and performance: A meta‐analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 69(1): 67-121.
  • Mirabi, V., Maghsoodi Ganjeh, F., & Maghsoodi Ganjeh, Y. 2017. The link between organisational citizenship behaviours and open innovation: A case of Isfahan high-tech sector. International Journal of Information, Security and Systems Management, 6(1): 649-655.
  • Muthuraman, S., & Al-Haziazi, M. 2017. Examining the factors of organizational citizenship behaviour with reference to corporate sectors in Sultanate of Oman. International Review of Management and Marketing, 7(1): 413-422.
  • Naqshbandi, M. M. 2016. Managerial ties and open innovation: Examining the role of absorptive capacity. Management Decision, 54(9): 2256-2276.
  • Naqshbandi, M. M., Singh, S. K. G., & Ma, P. 2016. The link between organisational citizenship behaviours and open innovation: A case of Malaysian high-tech sector. IIMB Management Review, 28(4): 200-211.
  • Narayanan, V. K. 2000. Managing technology and innovation for competitive advantage. Prentice Hall.
  • Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Oltra, M. J., Flor, M. L., & Alfaro, J. A. 2018. Open innovation and firm performance: The role of organizational mechanisms. Business Process Management Journal, 24(3): 814-836.
  • Organ, D. W. 1997. Organizational citizenship behavior: It's construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10(2): 85-97.
  • Organ, D.W. & Ryan, K. 1995. A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors and organizational citizenship behaviour. Personnel Psychology, 48(4): 775-802.
  • Özduran, A., & Tanova, C. 2017. Manager mindsets and employee organizational citizenship behaviours. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(1): 589-606.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. 1997. Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestion for future research. Human performance, 10(2): 133-151.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., Ahearne, M., & MacKenzie, S. B. 1997. Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2): 262–270.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. 1990. Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1: 107-142.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. 2000. Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3): 513-563.
  • Rajapathirana, R. J., & Hui, Y. 2018. Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(1): 44-55.
  • Romaiha, N. R., Maulud, F. S. F., Ismail, W. M. W., Jahya, A., Fahana, N., & Harun, A. 2019. The determinants of organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(8): 124-133.
  • Sadiç, E., Eğilmez, Ö., & Haşit, G. 2020. Üniversite çalışanları bağlamında sanal kaytarma ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı üzerine bir inceleme. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2): 234-256.
  • Senghore, F., Campos-Nanez, E., Fomin, P., & Wasek, J. S. 2015. Applying social network analysis to validate mass collaboration innovation drivers: An empirical study of NASA's International Space Apps Challenge. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 37: 21-31.
  • Sharma, V., & Jain, S. 2014. A scale for measuring organizational citizenship behavior in manufacturing sector. Pacific Business Review International, 6(8): 57–62.
  • Somech, A., & Khotaba, S. 2017. An integrative model for understanding team organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(6): 671-685.
  • Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. 2002. An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior: Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 12(2): 269-292.
  • Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. 2010. Theorizing about the deviant citizen: An attributional explanation of the interplay of organizational citizenship and counterproductive work behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2): 132-143.
  • Stanko, M. A., Fisher, G. J., & Bogers, M. 2017. Under the wide umbrella of open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(4): 543-558.
  • Taamneh, A., Alsaad, A. K., & Elrehail, H. 2018. HRM practices and the multifaceted nature of organization performance: The mediation effect of organizational citizenship behavior. EuroMed Journal of Business. 13(3): 315-334.
  • Turgut, M., & Akbolat, M. 2017. Örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel sessizlik ilişkisine yönelik sağlık çalışanları üzerine bir araştırma. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, 20(3): 357-384.
  • Wang, Z., & Wang, N. 2012. Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(10): 8899-8908.
  • West, J., & Bogers, M. 2017. Open innovation: Current status and research opportunities. Innovation: Organization & Management, 19 (1): 43-50.

The Relationship Between Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Open Innovation and Firm Performance

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 18 - 37, 09.08.2022

Salih Zeki İmamoğlu Hülya Türkcan Özlem Birgülen

https://doi.org/10.18825/iremjournal.1061261

Öz

The human resource that the firm has is the main determining factor for its outputs. In this direction, employees who voluntarily make extra efforts for the benefit of the organization are important for firms to obtain successful outputs. Open innovation, which eliminates the resource constraint of the firm in global competition conditions, ensures the success of the company, while the successful execution of open innovation is possible with the extra efforts of the employees, since it is based on communication, cooperation and coordination. From this point of view, the aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior, open innovation and firm performance. Within the scope of the research, data were collected from 188 firms operating in the manufacturing industry in the Kocaeli region through a questionnaire. The collected data were analyzed using AMOS statistical package program. According to the results of the analyses, organizational citizenship behavior affects open innovation and open innovation affects firm performance positively. In addition, it was found that open innovation has a full mediator effect on the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and firm performance.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Organizational Citizenship Behavior Open Innovation Firm Performance

Kaynakça

  • Aggarwal, A., & Singh, R. 2016. Exploring the nomological network of organizational citizenship behavior: A review of dimensions, antecedents and consequences. The IUP Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(3): 16-39.
  • Antikainen, M., Mäkipää, M., & Ahonen, M. 2010. Motivating and supporting collaboration in open innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(1): 100-119.
  • Barbosa, A. P. P. L., Salerno, M. S., Brasil, V. C., & de Souza Nascimento, P. T. 2020. Coordination approaches to foster open innovation R&D projects performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 58: 101603.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 1173-1182.
  • Bierly III, P. E., Damanpour, F., & Santoro, M. D. 2009. The application of external knowledge: Organizational conditions for exploration and exploitation. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3): 481-509.
  • Bigliardi, B., Ferraro, G., Filippelli, S., & Galati, F. 2020. The influence of open innovation on firm performance. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 12: 1-14.
  • Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., & Moedas, C. 2018. Open innovation: Research, practices, and policies. California Management Review, 60(2): 5-16.
  • Bowler, W. M., Paul, J. B., & Halbesleben, J. R. 2019. LMX and attributions of organizational citizenship behavior motives: When is citizenship perceived as brownnosing? Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(2): 139-152.
  • Byrne, B. M. 2016. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd Edition). New York: Routledge.
  • Chesbrough, H. 2004. Managing open innovation. Research-Technology Management, 47(1): 23-26.
  • Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. 2014. New frontiers in open innovation. UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Chesbrough, H.W. 2003. The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3): 35-41.
  • Choi, Y., & Yu, Y. 2014. The influence of perceived corporate sustainability practices on employees and organizational performance. Sustainability, 6(1): 348-364.
  • Crema, M., Verbano, C., & Venturini, K. 2014. Linking strategy with open innovation and performance in SMEs. Measuring Business Excellence, 18(2):14-27.
  • Çimen, K., Pekel, A., Atasoy, T., & Yanar, Ş. 2017. The relationship between organizational creativity levels and problem-solving abilities of sport Istanbul managers. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 3 (11): 318-328.
  • Ellinger, A. D., Ellinger, A. E., Yang, B., & Howton, S. W. 2002. The relationship between the learning organization concept and firms' financial performance: An empirical assessment. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13(1): 5-22.
  • Erdoğan, P., & Bedük, A. 2013. Örgütsel Sinizm ile Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Arasındaki İlişki: Sağlık Sektöründe Bir Araştırma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Teknik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1(6): 17-36.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39-50.
  • Goertzel, B., Goertzel, T., & Goertzel, Z. 2017. The global brain and the emerging economy of abundance: Mutualism, open collaboration, exchange networks and the automated commons. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114: 65-73.
  • Göktaş Kulualp, H., & Sarı, Ö. 2019. Destekleme davranışı ve sosyal değişim teorisi kapsamında kırsal turizmin etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(1): 643-666.
  • Gürbüz, S., Ayhan, Ö., & Sert, M. 2016. Örgütsel adalet ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ilişkisi: Türkiye’de yapılan araştırmalar üzerinden bir meta analizi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 31(77): 61-75.
  • Karaca, E., & Özmen, A. 2018. Örgütsel adaletin örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışına etkisi: Kamu ve özel sektörde karşılaştırmalı bir araştırma. Kastamonu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(1): 7- 30.
  • Karaman, A., & Aylan, S. 2012. Örgütsel vatandaşlık. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(1): 35-48.
  • Koys, D. J. 2001. The effects of employee satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, and turnover on organizational effectiveness: A unit‐level, longitudinal study. Personnel Psychology, 54(1): 101-114.
  • Langton, N., Robbins, S.P., & Judge, T.A. 2019. Organizational behaviour: Concepts, controversies, applications (Eighth Canadian Edition). Toronto: Pearson Education.
  • Lim, B. T.H., & Loosemore, M. 2017. How socially responsible is construction business in Australia and New Zealand? Procedia Engineering, 180: 531-540.
  • Martin, R., Guillaume, Y., Thomas, G., Lee, A., & Epitropaki, O. 2016. Leader–member exchange (LMX) and performance: A meta‐analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 69(1): 67-121.
  • Mirabi, V., Maghsoodi Ganjeh, F., & Maghsoodi Ganjeh, Y. 2017. The link between organisational citizenship behaviours and open innovation: A case of Isfahan high-tech sector. International Journal of Information, Security and Systems Management, 6(1): 649-655.
  • Muthuraman, S., & Al-Haziazi, M. 2017. Examining the factors of organizational citizenship behaviour with reference to corporate sectors in Sultanate of Oman. International Review of Management and Marketing, 7(1): 413-422.
  • Naqshbandi, M. M. 2016. Managerial ties and open innovation: Examining the role of absorptive capacity. Management Decision, 54(9): 2256-2276.
  • Naqshbandi, M. M., Singh, S. K. G., & Ma, P. 2016. The link between organisational citizenship behaviours and open innovation: A case of Malaysian high-tech sector. IIMB Management Review, 28(4): 200-211.
  • Narayanan, V. K. 2000. Managing technology and innovation for competitive advantage. Prentice Hall.
  • Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Oltra, M. J., Flor, M. L., & Alfaro, J. A. 2018. Open innovation and firm performance: The role of organizational mechanisms. Business Process Management Journal, 24(3): 814-836.
  • Organ, D. W. 1997. Organizational citizenship behavior: It's construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10(2): 85-97.
  • Organ, D.W. & Ryan, K. 1995. A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors and organizational citizenship behaviour. Personnel Psychology, 48(4): 775-802.
  • Özduran, A., & Tanova, C. 2017. Manager mindsets and employee organizational citizenship behaviours. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(1): 589-606.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. 1997. Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestion for future research. Human performance, 10(2): 133-151.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., Ahearne, M., & MacKenzie, S. B. 1997. Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2): 262–270.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. 1990. Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1: 107-142.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. 2000. Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3): 513-563.
  • Rajapathirana, R. J., & Hui, Y. 2018. Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(1): 44-55.
  • Romaiha, N. R., Maulud, F. S. F., Ismail, W. M. W., Jahya, A., Fahana, N., & Harun, A. 2019. The determinants of organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(8): 124-133.
  • Sadiç, E., Eğilmez, Ö., & Haşit, G. 2020. Üniversite çalışanları bağlamında sanal kaytarma ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı üzerine bir inceleme. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2): 234-256.
  • Senghore, F., Campos-Nanez, E., Fomin, P., & Wasek, J. S. 2015. Applying social network analysis to validate mass collaboration innovation drivers: An empirical study of NASA's International Space Apps Challenge. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 37: 21-31.
  • Sharma, V., & Jain, S. 2014. A scale for measuring organizational citizenship behavior in manufacturing sector. Pacific Business Review International, 6(8): 57–62.
  • Somech, A., & Khotaba, S. 2017. An integrative model for understanding team organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(6): 671-685.
  • Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. 2002. An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior: Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 12(2): 269-292.
  • Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. 2010. Theorizing about the deviant citizen: An attributional explanation of the interplay of organizational citizenship and counterproductive work behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2): 132-143.
  • Stanko, M. A., Fisher, G. J., & Bogers, M. 2017. Under the wide umbrella of open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(4): 543-558.
  • Taamneh, A., Alsaad, A. K., & Elrehail, H. 2018. HRM practices and the multifaceted nature of organization performance: The mediation effect of organizational citizenship behavior. EuroMed Journal of Business. 13(3): 315-334.
  • Turgut, M., & Akbolat, M. 2017. Örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı, örgütsel özdeşleşme ve örgütsel sessizlik ilişkisine yönelik sağlık çalışanları üzerine bir araştırma. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, 20(3): 357-384.
  • Wang, Z., & Wang, N. 2012. Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(10): 8899-8908.
  • West, J., & Bogers, M. 2017. Open innovation: Current status and research opportunities. Innovation: Organization & Management, 19 (1): 43-50.
Toplam 54 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular İşletme
Bölüm MAKALELER
Yazarlar

Salih Zeki İmamoğlu 0000-0002-7160-2370

Hülya Türkcan 0000-0001-7452-0461

Özlem Birgülen 0000-0001-7837-4203

Yayımlanma Tarihi 9 Ağustos 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 9 Mart 2022
Kabul Tarihi 5 Nisan 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA İmamoğlu, S. Z., Türkcan, H., & Birgülen, Ö. (2022). ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞI, AÇIK İNOVASYON VE FİRMA PERFORMANSI İLİŞKİSİ. International Review of Economics and Management, 10(1), 18-37. https://doi.org/10.18825/iremjournal.1061261
 Kapak Resmi İndir