Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

YÖNETİM KURULU YAPISININ SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR İNOVASYON YETENEĞİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ: TÜRKİYE’DE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 39 Sayı: 1, 103 - 120, 29.03.2021

Seyhan Öztürk Bekir Gerekan

https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.740563

Öz

Yoğun rekabet koşulları altında bilgi teknolojisinin sürekli olarak gelişim içerisinde olması ve müşteri taleplerinde ortaya çıkan kısa süreli değişimlere bağlı ürün yaşam döngülerinde meydana gelen kısalmalar, işletmelerin çalışma ortamlarında karmaşıklığa ve belirsizliğe sebebiyet vermektedir. Bu durum, işletmelerin sürdürülebilir inovasyon yeteneklerini ön plana çıkarmakta ve önem arz eder bir konuma getirmektedir. Bu çerçevede çalışmanın amacı, yönetim kurulu yapısının işletmelerin inovasyon yetenekleri üzerindeki etkisini tespit etmektir. Söz konusu amaç doğrultusunda, Borsa İstanbul 100 Endeksi’ nde yer alan şirketlerin 2009 – 2017 yıllarına ait verileri, panel veri analizi yöntemi ile incelenmiştir. Beck-Katz (1995) tarafından geliştirilen dirençli tahminci kullanılarak gerçekleştirilen regresyon analizi sonucunda; yönetim kurulu cinsiyet çeşitliliğinin ve rol ikiliğinin sürdürülebilir inovasyon yeteneği üzerinde negatif yönde istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı etkisinin olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bununla birlikte, yönetim kurulu yabancı üye oranı ve işletme büyüklüğünün sürdürülebilir inovasyon yeteneği üzerinde ise pozitif yönde istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı etkisinin olduğu görülmüştür. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sürdürülebilirlik İnovasyon İnovasyon Yeteneği Türkiye Yönetim Kurulu

Kaynakça

  • Akdoğan N, Gülhan O., Aktaş M. (2017). “The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and Corporate Governance: Evidence from Turkish Banking Sector”. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 13:181-195.
  • Akyos, M. (2005). “Ulusal İnovasyon (Yenilikçilik) Sistemi”. Uluslararası Silahlı Kuvvetler Muhabere ve Elektronik Derneği Türkiye Şubesi, Ankara, 1-46.
  • AlQudah, A.M., Azzam, M.J., Aleqab, M.M., Shakhatreh, M.Z. (2019). “The Impact of Board of Directors Characteristics on Banks Performance: Evidence From Jordan”. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 23(2): 1 – 16.
  • Anagnostopoulou, S. C., Levis, M. (2008). R&D and performance persistence: Evidence from the United Kingdom. The International Journal of Accounting, 43(3), 293-320.
  • Aygün, M., İç, S. (2010). “Genel Müdürün Aynı Zamanda Yönetim Kurulu Üyesi Olması Firma Performansını Etkiler mi?”. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 47: 192-201.
  • Balsmeier, B., Lee F., Gustavo M. (2017). “Independent Boards and Innovation”. Journal of Financial Economics, 123: 536-557.
  • Baraco, D.G., Brown, A.M. (2008). “Corporate Social Reporting and Board Representation: Evidence From The Kenyan Banking Sector”. Journal of Management and Governance, 12(4):309-324.
  • Beck N., Katz, J. N. (1995). “What To Do (and Not To Do) with Times-Series–Cross-Section Data in Comparative Politics”. American Political Science Review, 89(3): 634– 647.
  • Blibech, N., Berraies, S. (2018). “The Impact of CEO' Duality and Board's Size and Independence on Firms’ Innovation and Financial Performance”, Journal of Business Management and Economics, 9(1): 22-29.
  • Boz, D., Duran, C.,Yurt, S. (2019). “Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluk Ve Kurumsal Yönetim Arasındaki Etkileşimin Veri Zarflama İle Analizi: BİST Kurumsal Yönetim Endeksindeki Firmalar Üzerinde Bir Uygulama”. Journal Of Yaşar University, 14(54), 119-126.
  • Burmaoğlu, S., Şeşen, H. (2011) “ Türk Firmalarının Organizasyonel İnovasyon Yeteneğini Etkileyen Faktörler Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt:66, No:4, 1-11.
  • Bushman, R., Abbie, J. S. (2003). “Transparency, Financial Accounting Information and Corporate Governance”, Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 65-87.
  • Chang, R.D., Chang, Y.W., Chang, C.P., Hu, F. (2008). “The Effects of Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Investment Opportunity Set on Firm Performance”. Corporate Ownership & Control, 5(4): 135 – 148.
  • Chau, G., Gray, S.J. (2010). “Family Ownership, Board Independence and Voluntary Disclosure: Evidence from Hong Kong”. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 19: 93-109.
  • Cheng, E.C.M., Courtenay, S.M. (2006). “Board Composition, Regulatory Regime and Voluntary Disclosure”. The International Journal of Accounting, 41(3):262 – 289.
  • Coad, A., Rao, R. (2010). Firm growth and R&D expenditure. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19(2), 127-145.
  • Cook, A., Glass, C. (2015). “Do minority leaders affect corporate practice? Analyzing the effect of leadership composition on governance and product development”. Strategic Organization, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp.117-140.
  • Cumming, B. S. (1998) “Innovation Overview and Future Challenges”. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(1).
  • Den Hertog, P., Bilderbeek, R., Maltha, S. (1997). “Intangibles: The Soft Side of Innovation”. Futures, 29: 33–45.
  • Doğan, M., Elitaş, B.L., Ağca, V., Ögel, S. (2013). “The Impact of CEO Duality on Firm Performance: Evidence From Turkey”. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(2): 149-155.
  • Doğan, M., Yıldız, F. (2013). “Araştırma ve Geliştirme Harcamaları Firma Karlılığını Etkiler Mi? Türkiye Örneği”. In жинаfы= Procedia V International Congress on Entrepreneurship.–Алматы, 324 б. (p. 166).
  • Doğan, M., Topal, Y. (2016). “Yönetim Kurulundaki Yabancı Üye Sayısının ve Yabancı Sahipliğinin Finansal Performans Üzerindeki Etkisi”. Ege Akademik Bakış, 16(1): 31 – 48.
  • Driver, C., Guedes, M.J.C. (2012), “Research and development, cash flow, agency and governance: UK large companies”, Research Policy, 41(9): 1565-1577.
  • Golden, B. R., Zajac, E. J. (2001). “When Will Boards Influence Strategy? Inclination Power 5 Strategic Change”. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 1087–1111.
  • Gujarati, D.N. (2003). Basic Econometrics. New York: McGraw Hill Book Co.
  • Güleş, K. H., Bülbül, H. (2004) “Yenilikçilik: İşletmeler İçin Stratejik Rekabet Aracı”, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ekim.
  • Güner, M., Kurnaz, E. (2019). “Muhasebe Bilgi Sisteminin Kurumsal Yönetim Uygulamalarına Etkisi”. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 17(1), 297-313.
  • Hall, R. (1993). “A Framework Linking Intangible Resources and Capabiliites to Sustainable Competitive Advantage”. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 607–618.
  • Higgins, J. M. (1996) “Innovate or Evaporate: Creative Techniques for Strategist”, Long Range Planning, Volume 29, No 3.
  • Hopt, P. K. (2000). “Modern Company Law Problems: A European Perspe¬ctive. Company Law Reform in OECD Countries”, Stockholm: OECD.
  • Jermias, J. (2007). “The Effects of Corporate Governance on The Relationship Between Innovative Efforts and Performance”. European Accounting Review. 16(4): 827- 854.
  • Jesover, F., Kirkpatrick, G. (2005). “The Revised OECD Principles Of Corporate Governance and Their Relevance To Non- OECD Countries”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, S. 127-136.
  • Kaya, A. (2014). “Menkul Kıymet Piyasaları Ekonomik Büyümenin Bir Dinamiği midir? Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelere Yönelik Panel Veri Analizi”. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 28 (4): 285-306.
  • Kuşat, N. (2012). “Sürdürülebilir İşletmeler İçin Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik ve İçsel Unsurları”, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 227-242.
  • Kyunga, N., Kwangsoo, S. (2019). “The Gender Effect on a Firm’s Innovative Activities in the Emerging Economies”. Sustainability, 11, 1-24.
  • Laksmana, I. (2008). “Corporate Board Governance and Voluntary Disclosure of Executive Compensation Practices”. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25 (4): 1147-1182.
  • Liao, L., Luo, L., Tang, Q. (2015). “Gender Diversity, Board Independence, Environmental Committee and Greenhouse Gas Disclosure”. British Accounting Review, 47(4): 409-424.
  • Makkonen, T., Williams, A.M., Habersetzer, A. (2018). “Foreign Board Members and Firm Innovativeness: An Exploratory Analysis For Setting A Research Agenda”. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society,1-32.
  • Mallette, P., Fowler, K. L. (1992). “Effects of Board Composition and Stock Ownership on the Adoption of ‘Poison Pills”. Academy of Management Journal, 35 (5): 1010–1035.
  • Mezghanni, B.S. (2010). “How Ceo Attributes Affect Firm R&D Spending? New Evidence From A Panel Of French Firms” [Bil¬diri]. Crises et nouvelles problématiques de la Valeur, Mayıs 2010, Nice, France.
  • Miller, T., Triana, A.C. (2009). “Demographic Diversity in the Boardroom: Mediators of the Board Diversity–Firm Performance Relationship”. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5): 755-786.
  • Minow, N., Robert, A. G. (1996). “Corporate Governance” (2nd. Ed). USA: Blackwell Publishing. MKK (Merkezi Kayıt Kuruluşu- Central Securities Depository of Turkey). Available online: https://www.mkk.com.tr (accessed on January 2020).
  • Musteen, M., Barker, V.L., Baeten, V.L. (2006). “CEO Attributes Associated With Attitude Toward Change: The Direct and Moderating Effects of CEO Tenure”. Journal of Business Research, 59(5): 604-612.
  • Müeller, S.L. (2004). “Gender Gaps in Potential for Entrepreneurship Across Countries and Cultures”. J. Dev. Entrep. 9: 199–220.
  • Müller, V.O. (2014). “The Impact of Board Composition on the Financial Performance of FTSE100 Constituents”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109(2014): 969 – 975.
  • Na, K., Shin, K. (2019). “The Gender Effect on a Firm’s Innovative Activities in the Emerging Economies”. Sustainability, 11: 1 – 24.
  • Nielsen, S. (2010). “Top Management Team Diversity: A Review of Theories and Methodologies”. International Journal of Management Reviews, 301-316.
  • Obradovich, J. D., Gill, A. (2013) “The Impact of Corporate Governance and Financial Leverage on the Value of American Firms” International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 91: 1- 13.
  • Ocak, M., Arıkboğa, D. (2017). “Kurumsal Yönetişim Bileşenlerinin Tahakkuk Esaslı Kâr Yönetimi Üzerine Etkileri: Bağımsız Üyelerin ve Kadın Üyelerin Önemi”. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46(1): 98 – 116.
  • Önder, Ş.,, Kavak, N. N. (2019). “Sigorta Şirketlerinde Kurumsal Yönetim ve Finansal Performans Arasındaki İlişki”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (62), 170-183.
  • Quintana-Garcia, C., Benavides-Velasco, C.A. (2016). “Gender Diversity in Top Management Teams and Innovation Capabilities: The Initial Public Offerings of Biotechnology Firms”. Long Range Planning, 49(4): 507 – 518.
  • Rechner, P. L., Dalton, D. R. (1991). “CEO Duality and Organizational Performance: A ongitudinal Analysis”. Strategic Management Journal, 12 (2): 155–160.
  • Saliha, T., Abdessatar A. (2011). The Determinants of Financial Performance: An Empirical Test Using the Simultaneous Equations Method. Economics and Finance Review, 10(1), 01 – 19.
  • Samaha, K., Dahawy, K., Hussainey, K., Stapleton, P. (2012). “The extent of corporate governance disclosure and its determinants in a developing market: The case of Egypt”. Advances in Accounting, incorporating Advances in International Accounting, 28: 168–178.
  • Shapiro, D., Tang, Y., Wang, M., Zhang, W. (2015). “The effects of corporate governance on innovation in Chinese firms”. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 311-335.
  • Sunday, O., Godvin, O. (2017). “Effects of Board Globalizing on Financial Performance of Banks in Nigeria”. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 7(4):1-10.
  • Swastika, D. L. T. (2013). Corporate Governance, Firm Size, and Earning Management: Evidence in Indonesia Stock Exchange. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), e-ISSN: 2278-487X, p-ISSN: 2319-7668, 10(4), 77-82.
  • Tan, Ş. (2016). SPSS ve Excel Uygulamalı Temel İstatistik-I. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Tatoğlu, F.Y. (2016). Panel Veri Ekonometrisi. İstanbul: Beta Yayın.
  • Tırpancı, İ. (2019). “Türkiye'de Kurumsal Yönetim ve Şirketlerin Finansal Performansları Üzerine Etkisi”. Mali Çözüm Dergisi, 29, 115-129.
  • Tuan, K. (2019). “Yönetim Kurulu Özelliklerinin Sürdürülebilirlik Raporlarına Etkisi: Borsa İstanbul Örneği”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (36), 233-242.
  • Ujunwa, A., Nwakoby, I., Ugbam, C.O. (2012). “Corporate Board Diversity and Firm Performance: Evidence From Nigeria”. Corporate Ownership and Control, 9(2): 216-223.
  • Ün, T. (2018). Uygulamalı Panel Veri Ekonometrisi. İstanbul: Der Yayınları.
  • Vafeas, N., Theodorou, E. (1998). “The Relationship Between Board Structure and Firm Performance in the UK”. The British Accounting Review, 30: 383-407.
  • Xu, P., Bai, G. (2019). “Board Governance, Sustainable Innovation Capability and Corporate Expansion: Empirical Data from Private Listed Companies in China”. Sustainability, 11: 1-17.
  • Yaser, Q.R., Al Mamun, A., Surıya, A.R. (2014). “CEO Duality Structure and Firm Performance in Pakistan”. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 5: 57–69.
  • Yorgancılar, F. N. (2011). “Sürdürülebilir Rekabet Anlayışı Olarak Yenilik Yeteneği”. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(21), 379-426.

THE EFFECT OF BOARD STRUCTURE ON SUSTAINABLE INNOVATION CAPABILITY: A RESEARCH ON TURKEY

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 39 Sayı: 1, 103 - 120, 29.03.2021

Seyhan Öztürk Bekir Gerekan

https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.740563

Öz

The continuous development of information technology under intense competition environment and shortening in the product life cycles based on short-term changes in customer demands lead to complexity and uncertainty in business environments. This situation features the sustainable innovation capabilities of enterprises, highlighting their significance. In this context, the objective of this study is to determine the impact of board structure on the innovation capabilities of businesses. In line with this purpose, the data of the companies included in the Istanbul Stock Exchange 100 Index for the years 2009 – 2017 were examined by panel data analysis method. As a result of regression analysis using the robust estimator developed by Beck-Katz (1995), it was found that gender diversity and role duality in the board of directors had a statistically significant negative impact on sustainable innovation capability. However, it was also observed that the ratio of foreign members in the board of directors and the size of the enterprise had a statistically significant positive impact on sustainable innovation capability.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Board of directors sustainability innovation in innovation capability Turkey

Kaynakça

  • Akdoğan N, Gülhan O., Aktaş M. (2017). “The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and Corporate Governance: Evidence from Turkish Banking Sector”. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 13:181-195.
  • Akyos, M. (2005). “Ulusal İnovasyon (Yenilikçilik) Sistemi”. Uluslararası Silahlı Kuvvetler Muhabere ve Elektronik Derneği Türkiye Şubesi, Ankara, 1-46.
  • AlQudah, A.M., Azzam, M.J., Aleqab, M.M., Shakhatreh, M.Z. (2019). “The Impact of Board of Directors Characteristics on Banks Performance: Evidence From Jordan”. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 23(2): 1 – 16.
  • Anagnostopoulou, S. C., Levis, M. (2008). R&D and performance persistence: Evidence from the United Kingdom. The International Journal of Accounting, 43(3), 293-320.
  • Aygün, M., İç, S. (2010). “Genel Müdürün Aynı Zamanda Yönetim Kurulu Üyesi Olması Firma Performansını Etkiler mi?”. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 47: 192-201.
  • Balsmeier, B., Lee F., Gustavo M. (2017). “Independent Boards and Innovation”. Journal of Financial Economics, 123: 536-557.
  • Baraco, D.G., Brown, A.M. (2008). “Corporate Social Reporting and Board Representation: Evidence From The Kenyan Banking Sector”. Journal of Management and Governance, 12(4):309-324.
  • Beck N., Katz, J. N. (1995). “What To Do (and Not To Do) with Times-Series–Cross-Section Data in Comparative Politics”. American Political Science Review, 89(3): 634– 647.
  • Blibech, N., Berraies, S. (2018). “The Impact of CEO' Duality and Board's Size and Independence on Firms’ Innovation and Financial Performance”, Journal of Business Management and Economics, 9(1): 22-29.
  • Boz, D., Duran, C.,Yurt, S. (2019). “Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluk Ve Kurumsal Yönetim Arasındaki Etkileşimin Veri Zarflama İle Analizi: BİST Kurumsal Yönetim Endeksindeki Firmalar Üzerinde Bir Uygulama”. Journal Of Yaşar University, 14(54), 119-126.
  • Burmaoğlu, S., Şeşen, H. (2011) “ Türk Firmalarının Organizasyonel İnovasyon Yeteneğini Etkileyen Faktörler Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt:66, No:4, 1-11.
  • Bushman, R., Abbie, J. S. (2003). “Transparency, Financial Accounting Information and Corporate Governance”, Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 65-87.
  • Chang, R.D., Chang, Y.W., Chang, C.P., Hu, F. (2008). “The Effects of Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Investment Opportunity Set on Firm Performance”. Corporate Ownership & Control, 5(4): 135 – 148.
  • Chau, G., Gray, S.J. (2010). “Family Ownership, Board Independence and Voluntary Disclosure: Evidence from Hong Kong”. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 19: 93-109.
  • Cheng, E.C.M., Courtenay, S.M. (2006). “Board Composition, Regulatory Regime and Voluntary Disclosure”. The International Journal of Accounting, 41(3):262 – 289.
  • Coad, A., Rao, R. (2010). Firm growth and R&D expenditure. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19(2), 127-145.
  • Cook, A., Glass, C. (2015). “Do minority leaders affect corporate practice? Analyzing the effect of leadership composition on governance and product development”. Strategic Organization, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp.117-140.
  • Cumming, B. S. (1998) “Innovation Overview and Future Challenges”. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(1).
  • Den Hertog, P., Bilderbeek, R., Maltha, S. (1997). “Intangibles: The Soft Side of Innovation”. Futures, 29: 33–45.
  • Doğan, M., Elitaş, B.L., Ağca, V., Ögel, S. (2013). “The Impact of CEO Duality on Firm Performance: Evidence From Turkey”. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(2): 149-155.
  • Doğan, M., Yıldız, F. (2013). “Araştırma ve Geliştirme Harcamaları Firma Karlılığını Etkiler Mi? Türkiye Örneği”. In жинаfы= Procedia V International Congress on Entrepreneurship.–Алматы, 324 б. (p. 166).
  • Doğan, M., Topal, Y. (2016). “Yönetim Kurulundaki Yabancı Üye Sayısının ve Yabancı Sahipliğinin Finansal Performans Üzerindeki Etkisi”. Ege Akademik Bakış, 16(1): 31 – 48.
  • Driver, C., Guedes, M.J.C. (2012), “Research and development, cash flow, agency and governance: UK large companies”, Research Policy, 41(9): 1565-1577.
  • Golden, B. R., Zajac, E. J. (2001). “When Will Boards Influence Strategy? Inclination Power 5 Strategic Change”. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 1087–1111.
  • Gujarati, D.N. (2003). Basic Econometrics. New York: McGraw Hill Book Co.
  • Güleş, K. H., Bülbül, H. (2004) “Yenilikçilik: İşletmeler İçin Stratejik Rekabet Aracı”, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ekim.
  • Güner, M., Kurnaz, E. (2019). “Muhasebe Bilgi Sisteminin Kurumsal Yönetim Uygulamalarına Etkisi”. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 17(1), 297-313.
  • Hall, R. (1993). “A Framework Linking Intangible Resources and Capabiliites to Sustainable Competitive Advantage”. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 607–618.
  • Higgins, J. M. (1996) “Innovate or Evaporate: Creative Techniques for Strategist”, Long Range Planning, Volume 29, No 3.
  • Hopt, P. K. (2000). “Modern Company Law Problems: A European Perspe¬ctive. Company Law Reform in OECD Countries”, Stockholm: OECD.
  • Jermias, J. (2007). “The Effects of Corporate Governance on The Relationship Between Innovative Efforts and Performance”. European Accounting Review. 16(4): 827- 854.
  • Jesover, F., Kirkpatrick, G. (2005). “The Revised OECD Principles Of Corporate Governance and Their Relevance To Non- OECD Countries”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, S. 127-136.
  • Kaya, A. (2014). “Menkul Kıymet Piyasaları Ekonomik Büyümenin Bir Dinamiği midir? Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelere Yönelik Panel Veri Analizi”. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 28 (4): 285-306.
  • Kuşat, N. (2012). “Sürdürülebilir İşletmeler İçin Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik ve İçsel Unsurları”, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 227-242.
  • Kyunga, N., Kwangsoo, S. (2019). “The Gender Effect on a Firm’s Innovative Activities in the Emerging Economies”. Sustainability, 11, 1-24.
  • Laksmana, I. (2008). “Corporate Board Governance and Voluntary Disclosure of Executive Compensation Practices”. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25 (4): 1147-1182.
  • Liao, L., Luo, L., Tang, Q. (2015). “Gender Diversity, Board Independence, Environmental Committee and Greenhouse Gas Disclosure”. British Accounting Review, 47(4): 409-424.
  • Makkonen, T., Williams, A.M., Habersetzer, A. (2018). “Foreign Board Members and Firm Innovativeness: An Exploratory Analysis For Setting A Research Agenda”. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society,1-32.
  • Mallette, P., Fowler, K. L. (1992). “Effects of Board Composition and Stock Ownership on the Adoption of ‘Poison Pills”. Academy of Management Journal, 35 (5): 1010–1035.
  • Mezghanni, B.S. (2010). “How Ceo Attributes Affect Firm R&D Spending? New Evidence From A Panel Of French Firms” [Bil¬diri]. Crises et nouvelles problématiques de la Valeur, Mayıs 2010, Nice, France.
  • Miller, T., Triana, A.C. (2009). “Demographic Diversity in the Boardroom: Mediators of the Board Diversity–Firm Performance Relationship”. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5): 755-786.
  • Minow, N., Robert, A. G. (1996). “Corporate Governance” (2nd. Ed). USA: Blackwell Publishing. MKK (Merkezi Kayıt Kuruluşu- Central Securities Depository of Turkey). Available online: https://www.mkk.com.tr (accessed on January 2020).
  • Musteen, M., Barker, V.L., Baeten, V.L. (2006). “CEO Attributes Associated With Attitude Toward Change: The Direct and Moderating Effects of CEO Tenure”. Journal of Business Research, 59(5): 604-612.
  • Müeller, S.L. (2004). “Gender Gaps in Potential for Entrepreneurship Across Countries and Cultures”. J. Dev. Entrep. 9: 199–220.
  • Müller, V.O. (2014). “The Impact of Board Composition on the Financial Performance of FTSE100 Constituents”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109(2014): 969 – 975.
  • Na, K., Shin, K. (2019). “The Gender Effect on a Firm’s Innovative Activities in the Emerging Economies”. Sustainability, 11: 1 – 24.
  • Nielsen, S. (2010). “Top Management Team Diversity: A Review of Theories and Methodologies”. International Journal of Management Reviews, 301-316.
  • Obradovich, J. D., Gill, A. (2013) “The Impact of Corporate Governance and Financial Leverage on the Value of American Firms” International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 91: 1- 13.
  • Ocak, M., Arıkboğa, D. (2017). “Kurumsal Yönetişim Bileşenlerinin Tahakkuk Esaslı Kâr Yönetimi Üzerine Etkileri: Bağımsız Üyelerin ve Kadın Üyelerin Önemi”. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46(1): 98 – 116.
  • Önder, Ş.,, Kavak, N. N. (2019). “Sigorta Şirketlerinde Kurumsal Yönetim ve Finansal Performans Arasındaki İlişki”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (62), 170-183.
  • Quintana-Garcia, C., Benavides-Velasco, C.A. (2016). “Gender Diversity in Top Management Teams and Innovation Capabilities: The Initial Public Offerings of Biotechnology Firms”. Long Range Planning, 49(4): 507 – 518.
  • Rechner, P. L., Dalton, D. R. (1991). “CEO Duality and Organizational Performance: A ongitudinal Analysis”. Strategic Management Journal, 12 (2): 155–160.
  • Saliha, T., Abdessatar A. (2011). The Determinants of Financial Performance: An Empirical Test Using the Simultaneous Equations Method. Economics and Finance Review, 10(1), 01 – 19.
  • Samaha, K., Dahawy, K., Hussainey, K., Stapleton, P. (2012). “The extent of corporate governance disclosure and its determinants in a developing market: The case of Egypt”. Advances in Accounting, incorporating Advances in International Accounting, 28: 168–178.
  • Shapiro, D., Tang, Y., Wang, M., Zhang, W. (2015). “The effects of corporate governance on innovation in Chinese firms”. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 311-335.
  • Sunday, O., Godvin, O. (2017). “Effects of Board Globalizing on Financial Performance of Banks in Nigeria”. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 7(4):1-10.
  • Swastika, D. L. T. (2013). Corporate Governance, Firm Size, and Earning Management: Evidence in Indonesia Stock Exchange. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), e-ISSN: 2278-487X, p-ISSN: 2319-7668, 10(4), 77-82.
  • Tan, Ş. (2016). SPSS ve Excel Uygulamalı Temel İstatistik-I. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Tatoğlu, F.Y. (2016). Panel Veri Ekonometrisi. İstanbul: Beta Yayın.
  • Tırpancı, İ. (2019). “Türkiye'de Kurumsal Yönetim ve Şirketlerin Finansal Performansları Üzerine Etkisi”. Mali Çözüm Dergisi, 29, 115-129.
  • Tuan, K. (2019). “Yönetim Kurulu Özelliklerinin Sürdürülebilirlik Raporlarına Etkisi: Borsa İstanbul Örneği”. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (36), 233-242.
  • Ujunwa, A., Nwakoby, I., Ugbam, C.O. (2012). “Corporate Board Diversity and Firm Performance: Evidence From Nigeria”. Corporate Ownership and Control, 9(2): 216-223.
  • Ün, T. (2018). Uygulamalı Panel Veri Ekonometrisi. İstanbul: Der Yayınları.
  • Vafeas, N., Theodorou, E. (1998). “The Relationship Between Board Structure and Firm Performance in the UK”. The British Accounting Review, 30: 383-407.
  • Xu, P., Bai, G. (2019). “Board Governance, Sustainable Innovation Capability and Corporate Expansion: Empirical Data from Private Listed Companies in China”. Sustainability, 11: 1-17.
  • Yaser, Q.R., Al Mamun, A., Surıya, A.R. (2014). “CEO Duality Structure and Firm Performance in Pakistan”. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 5: 57–69.
  • Yorgancılar, F. N. (2011). “Sürdürülebilir Rekabet Anlayışı Olarak Yenilik Yeteneği”. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(21), 379-426.
Toplam 67 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
Yazarlar

Seyhan Öztürk

Bekir Gerekan

Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Mart 2021
Gönderilme Tarihi 21 Mayıs 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021 Cilt: 39 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Öztürk, S., & Gerekan, B. (2021). THE EFFECT OF BOARD STRUCTURE ON SUSTAINABLE INNOVATION CAPABILITY: A RESEARCH ON TURKEY. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 39(1), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.740563
AMA Öztürk S, Gerekan B. THE EFFECT OF BOARD STRUCTURE ON SUSTAINABLE INNOVATION CAPABILITY: A RESEARCH ON TURKEY. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. Mart 2021;39(1):103-120. doi:10.17065/huniibf.740563
Chicago Öztürk, Seyhan, ve Bekir Gerekan. “THE EFFECT OF BOARD STRUCTURE ON SUSTAINABLE INNOVATION CAPABILITY: A RESEARCH ON TURKEY”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 39, sy. 1 (Mart 2021): 103-20. https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.740563.
EndNote Öztürk S, Gerekan B (01 Mart 2021) THE EFFECT OF BOARD STRUCTURE ON SUSTAINABLE INNOVATION CAPABILITY: A RESEARCH ON TURKEY. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 39 1 103–120.
IEEE S. Öztürk ve B. Gerekan, “THE EFFECT OF BOARD STRUCTURE ON SUSTAINABLE INNOVATION CAPABILITY: A RESEARCH ON TURKEY”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 39, sy. 1, ss. 103–120, 2021, doi: 10.17065/huniibf.740563.
ISNAD Öztürk, Seyhan - Gerekan, Bekir. “THE EFFECT OF BOARD STRUCTURE ON SUSTAINABLE INNOVATION CAPABILITY: A RESEARCH ON TURKEY”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 39/1 (Mart 2021), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.740563.
JAMA Öztürk S, Gerekan B. THE EFFECT OF BOARD STRUCTURE ON SUSTAINABLE INNOVATION CAPABILITY: A RESEARCH ON TURKEY. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2021;39:103–120.
MLA Öztürk, Seyhan ve Bekir Gerekan. “THE EFFECT OF BOARD STRUCTURE ON SUSTAINABLE INNOVATION CAPABILITY: A RESEARCH ON TURKEY”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 39, sy. 1, 2021, ss. 103-20, doi:10.17065/huniibf.740563.
Vancouver Öztürk S, Gerekan B. THE EFFECT OF BOARD STRUCTURE ON SUSTAINABLE INNOVATION CAPABILITY: A RESEARCH ON TURKEY. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2021;39(1):103-20.

Dergiye yayımlanmak üzere gönderilecek yazılar Dergi'nin son sayfasında ve Dergi web sistesinde yer alan Yazar Rehberi'ndeki kurallara uygun olmalıdır.


Gizlilik Beyanı

Bu dergi sitesindeki isimler ve e-posta adresleri sadece bu derginin belirtilen amaçları doğrultusunda kullanılacaktır; farklı herhangi bir amaç için veya diğer kişilerin kullanımına açılmayacaktır.