Research Article
Year 2017,
16. UIK Special Issue, 377 - 390, 09.10.2017
Abstract
İnovasyon, teknolojik gelişmelerin etkisi ile
şekillenen günümüz pazar koşullarında işletmelerin rekabet avantajı yaratma ve
sürdürme yeteneklerinin önemli bir parçası olarak görülmektedir. Bu çalışmada,
diğer sektörlere nazaran daha homojen özellikler taşımaları ve teknolojik
inovasyon konusuna odaklı faaliyet göstermeleri sebebi ile otomotiv sektöründe
yer alan işletmelerde inovasyonu ortaya çıkaran işletme yeteneklerinin göreli
önem derecelerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Bu amaçla, öncelikle bir
literatür incelemesi yapılarak inovasyon yeteneğini etkileyen işletme
yetenekleri tespit edilmiştir. Bu yeteneklerin inovasyon sürecindeki göreli
önem derecelerini belirlemek için otomotiv sektöründe görev yapan üst düzey
yöneticilerden oluşan bir uzman grubunun görüşleri alınmıştır. Analiz
aşamasında Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi (AHP) kullanılmıştır.
References
- Burgelman, R., Maidique, M.A., Wheelwright, S.C. (2004). Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation, McGraw Hill, New York.
- Carlsson, B. Jacobsson, S. Holmén, M., Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation System: Analytical and Met-hodological Issues. Research Policy, 31 (2), 233-245.
- Chaminade, C. ve Plechero, M. (2015). Do Regions Make a Difference? Regional Innovation Sytems and Global Innovation Networks in the ICT Industry, European Planning Studies, 23, 215-237.
- Christensen, J.F. (1995). Asset Profiles for Technological Innovation. Research Policy, 24, 727-745.
- Drucker, P.F. (1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
- Drucker, P. (1998). The Discipline of Innovation, Harvard Business Review, November- December.
- Ehie, I. C., & Olibe, K. (2010). The effect of R&D investment on firm value: An examination of US manufacturing and service industries. International Journal of Production Economics, 128(1), 127-135.
- Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., ve Alpkan, L. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm perfor-mance. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(2), 662-676.
- Hamel, G., ve Prahalad, C. K.(1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, 3, 79-92.
- Klingebiel, R., & Rammer, C. (2014). Resource allocation strategy for innovation portfolio manage-ment. Strategic Management Journal, 35(2), 246-268.
- Morgan, K. ve Nauwelaers, C. (1999). Regional Innovation Strategies. The Stationary Office, Lon-don.
- Navarro, M., Gibaja, J.J., Bilbao-Osorio, B. ve Aguado, R. (2009). Patterns of Innovation in EU- 25 Regions: A Typology and Policy Recommendations. Environment and Planning C: Govern-ment and Policy, 27, 815-840.
- Nelson, R.R. ve Rosenberg, N. (1993). Technical Innovation and National Innovation Systems, Nati-onal Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. (Ed. Richard R. Nelson), Oxford Univer-sity Press, Oxford.
- OECD, 2005. Oslo Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological In-novation Data. Paris.
- Porter, M.E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press, New York.
- Schumpeter, J.A., (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
- OECD (1997) , National Innovation Systems, s.9.
- www.tim.org.tr/tr/basin-odasi-timden-haberler-kuresel-inovasyon-endeksi-2016-verileri-aciklandi.html (eririşim tarihi, 21.06.2017).
- Yam, R.C., Guan, J.C., Pun, K.F., Tang, P.Y. (2004). An Audit of Technological Innovation Capabilities in Chinese Firms: Some Empirical Findings in Beijing, China. Research Policy, 33(8), 1123-1250.
- Yam, R. C., Lo, W., Tang, E. P., & Lau, A. K. (2011). Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance: An empirical study of Hong Kong manufactu-ring industries. Research Policy, 40(3), 391-402.
Year 2017,
16. UIK Special Issue, 377 - 390, 09.10.2017
Abstract
References
- Burgelman, R., Maidique, M.A., Wheelwright, S.C. (2004). Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation, McGraw Hill, New York.
- Carlsson, B. Jacobsson, S. Holmén, M., Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation System: Analytical and Met-hodological Issues. Research Policy, 31 (2), 233-245.
- Chaminade, C. ve Plechero, M. (2015). Do Regions Make a Difference? Regional Innovation Sytems and Global Innovation Networks in the ICT Industry, European Planning Studies, 23, 215-237.
- Christensen, J.F. (1995). Asset Profiles for Technological Innovation. Research Policy, 24, 727-745.
- Drucker, P.F. (1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
- Drucker, P. (1998). The Discipline of Innovation, Harvard Business Review, November- December.
- Ehie, I. C., & Olibe, K. (2010). The effect of R&D investment on firm value: An examination of US manufacturing and service industries. International Journal of Production Economics, 128(1), 127-135.
- Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., ve Alpkan, L. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm perfor-mance. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(2), 662-676.
- Hamel, G., ve Prahalad, C. K.(1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, 3, 79-92.
- Klingebiel, R., & Rammer, C. (2014). Resource allocation strategy for innovation portfolio manage-ment. Strategic Management Journal, 35(2), 246-268.
- Morgan, K. ve Nauwelaers, C. (1999). Regional Innovation Strategies. The Stationary Office, Lon-don.
- Navarro, M., Gibaja, J.J., Bilbao-Osorio, B. ve Aguado, R. (2009). Patterns of Innovation in EU- 25 Regions: A Typology and Policy Recommendations. Environment and Planning C: Govern-ment and Policy, 27, 815-840.
- Nelson, R.R. ve Rosenberg, N. (1993). Technical Innovation and National Innovation Systems, Nati-onal Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. (Ed. Richard R. Nelson), Oxford Univer-sity Press, Oxford.
- OECD, 2005. Oslo Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological In-novation Data. Paris.
- Porter, M.E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press, New York.
- Schumpeter, J.A., (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
- OECD (1997) , National Innovation Systems, s.9.
- www.tim.org.tr/tr/basin-odasi-timden-haberler-kuresel-inovasyon-endeksi-2016-verileri-aciklandi.html (eririşim tarihi, 21.06.2017).
- Yam, R.C., Guan, J.C., Pun, K.F., Tang, P.Y. (2004). An Audit of Technological Innovation Capabilities in Chinese Firms: Some Empirical Findings in Beijing, China. Research Policy, 33(8), 1123-1250.
- Yam, R. C., Lo, W., Tang, E. P., & Lau, A. K. (2011). Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance: An empirical study of Hong Kong manufactu-ring industries. Research Policy, 40(3), 391-402.
There are 20 citations in total.
Details
| Journal Section | Articles |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | October 9, 2017 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2017 16. UIK Special Issue |
Cited By
MAKİNE BAKIM PLANLAMASI PROBLEMİNİN ÇOK KRİTERLİ KARAR VERME ÇÖZÜMÜNDE ASKERİ MATBAA ÖRNEĞİ
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.24889/ifede.1302103
İNOVASYON ODAKLI GİRİŞİMLERİN DESTEKLENDİĞİ TEKNOPARKLARIN KURULUŞ YERİ SEÇİMİNDE ETKİLİ OLAN DEĞİŞKENLERİN AHP İLE ÖNEM KATSAYILARININ BELİRLENMESİ
Uluslararası Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri ve Bilgisayar Bilimleri Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.33461/uybisbbd.639991
______________________________________________________
Address: Karadeniz Technical University Department of Economics Room Number 213
61080 Trabzon / Turkey
e-mail : uiiidergisi@gmail.com