Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

İşkolik Davranışlar, Algılanan Katkı ve Yaşam Doyumu İlişkisinde İşte Kendini Yetiştirmenin Aracı Etkisi

Year 2021, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 83 - 93, 29.06.2021

Recep Özsürünç Ömer Erdem Koçak

https://doi.org/10.51524/uhusbad.940291

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, işkolik davranışların hem kişinin yaşam doyumu hem de kendi çevrelerine ne derece katkı yaptıklarına dair inançları arasındaki ilişkilerde, işte kendini yetiştirmenin aracı rolünü inceleyerek, işkolik davranışların bireyin kimliği ve iş dışı hayatına nasıl etki edebileceğine ışık tutmaktır. Kolayda örnekleme yöntemi kullanılarak ulaşılan 259 (n=189) kişiden toplanan verilerle analizler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Analizler için yapısal eşitlik modellemesi kullanılmış, aracı değişken etkisi için bootstrap yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada elde edilen sonuçlara göre, işte kendini yetiştirme değişkeni algılanan katkı ve yaşam doyumu değişkenleri için aracı değişken etkisi göstermektedir. Bulguların daha önce elde edilmemiş sonuçlar ortaya koymasının literatüre katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

Keywords

Yaşam Doyumu İşkolik Davranışlar İşte Kendini Yetiştirme Algılanan Katkı

Thanks

Öğrencilerimiz İrem Nur Güçlü, İrem Kahraman ve Hatice Demir'e veri toplama sürecindeki katkılarından dolayı teşekkür ederiz.

References

  • Abid, G., Zahra, I., & Ahmed, A. (2015). Mediated Mechanism of Thriving at Work between Perceived Organization Support, Innovative Work Behavior and Turnover Intention. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 9(3), 982-998.
  • Alkan, S. E., & Turgut, T. (2015). A research about the relationship of psychological safety and organizational politics perception with compulsory citizenship behavior and the pressures behind compulsory citizenship behavior. Research journal of Business and Management, 2(2), 185-203.
  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2010). IBM SPSS Amos 19 user’s guide. Crawfordville, FL: Amos Development Corporation, 635.
  • Avanzi, L., van Dick, R., Fraccaroli, F., & Sarchielli, G. (2012). The downside of organizational identification: Relations between identification, workaholism and well-being. Work & Stress, 26(3), 289-307.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
  • Baruch, Y. (2011). )e Positive Wellbeing Aspects of Workaholism in Cross Cultural Perspective the Chocoholism Metaphor. Career Development International, 16(6), 572–591. doi:10.1108/13620431111178335
  • Bolino, M. C. (1999). Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors?. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 82-98. Bowen, N. K., & Guo, S. (2011). Structural equation modeling. Oxford University Press.
  • Chacko, T. I. (1983). Job and life satisfactions: A causal analysis of their relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 26(1), 163-169.
  • Chin, W. W., Gopal, A., & Salisbury, W. D. (1997). Advancing the theory of adaptive structuration: The development of a scale to measure faithfulness of appropriation. Information systems research, 8(4), 342-367.
  • Clark, M. A., Michel, J. S., Stevens, G. W., Howell, J. W., & Scruggs, R. S. (2014). Workaholism, work engagement and work–home outcomes: Exploring the mediating role of positive and negative emotions. Stress and Health, 30(4), 287-300.
  • Deiner, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, Vol 55(1), 34-43.
  • Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J. ve Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49(1), 71-75.
  • Diener, E., Sapyta, J. J., & Suh, E. (1998). Subjective well-being is essential to well-being. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 33-37.
  • Du, D., Derks, D., Bakker, A. B., & Lu, C. Q. (2017). Does homesickness undermine the potential of job resources? A perspective from the work–home resources model. Journal of Organizational Behavior.
  • Dursun, S. ve İştar, E. (2014). Kadın Çalışanların Yaşamış Oldukları İş Aile Yaşamı Çatışmasının İş Ve Yaşam Doyumu Üzerine Etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 28(3), 127-137.
  • Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(1), 5.
  • Erdoğan, B., Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., & Mansfield, L. R. (2012). Whistle while you work: A review of the life satisfaction literature. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1038-1083.
  • Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press.
  • Fassel, D. (1990), Working Ourselves to Death: The High Cost of Workaholism, the Rewards of Recovery, Harper San Francisco.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50.
  • Geurts, S. A., & Sonnentag, S. (2006). Recovery as an explanatory mechanism in the relation between acute stress reactions and chronic health impairment. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 482-492.
  • Gini, A. L. (1998), “Working Ourselves to Death: Workaholism, Stress, And Fatigue”, Business and Society Review, 100(1), pp. 45-56.
  • Grant, A. (2014). Give and take: Why helping others drives our success. Penguin.
  • Grant, A. M., & Mayer, D. M. (2009). Good soldiers and good actors: prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 900.
  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: a review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long range planning, 45(5), 320-340.
  • Hochschild, A. R. (1997). When work becomes home and home becomes work. California Management Review, 39(4), 79-97.
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
  • Iris, B. ve Barrett, G. V. (1972). Some relations between job and life satisfaction and job importance. Journal of applied Psychology, 56(4), 301-304. Killinger, B. (1991), Workaholics: the Respectable Addicts, Simon and Schuster, New York, NY.
  • Koçak, Ö. E. (2016). How to Enable Thriving at Work through Organizational Trust. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 5(4), 40.
  • Koçak, Ö.E. (2017) How Employees Thrive at Work? Importance of Relationship Quality, Person-Job Fit, and Recovery Experiences After Work Hours. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Marmara University. İstanbul.
  • Koçak, Ö.E., Erebak, S. (2017) İş Amaçlı Akıllı Telefon Kullanımı ve İş-Ev Dengesi İlişkisi: İşkolikliğin Aracı Değişken Etkisi. İş, Güç Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi (İncelemede)
  • Korn, E. R., Pratt, G. J. ve Lambrou, P. T. (1987), Hyper-Performance: The AIM Strategy for Releasing Your Business Potential, John Wiley ve Sons.
  • Libano, M. D., Salanova, M., & Schaufeli, W. (2010). Validity of a brief workaholism scale. Psicothema-Revista de Psicologia, 22(1), 143-150.
  • London, M., Crandall, R. ve Seals, G. W. (1977). The contribution of job and leisure satisfaction to quality of life. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(3), 328-334.
  • Machlowitz, M. (1980), Workaholics, Living with Them, Working with Them, Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
  • Matuska, K. M. (2010). Workaholism, life balance, and well‐being: a comparative analysis. Journal of Occupational Science, 17(2), 104-111.
  • McClelland, D. C. (1965). Toward a theory of motive acquisition. American psychologist, 20(5), 321.
  • McMillan, L. H. W. (2002). Workaholism: How Does it Impact on People's Lives?.
  • Naughton, T. J. (1987). A conceptual view of workaholism and implications for career counseling and research. The Career Development Quarterly, 35(3), 180-187.
  • Nix, G. A., Ryan, R. M., Manly, J. B., & Deci, E. L. (1999). Revitalization through self-regulation: The effects of autonomous and controlled motivation on happiness and vitality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(3), 266-284.
  • Oates, W. E. (1971), Confessions of a Workaholic: The Facts about Work Addiction, World Publishing Company.
  • Orpen, C. (1978). Work and Nonwork Satisfaction: A Causal-Correlational Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4), 530-532.
  • Özer, M. ve Karabulut, Ö. Ö. (2003). Life satisfaction in the elderly. Yaşlılarda yaşam doyumu. Geriatri, 6(2), 72-74.
  • Paterson, T. A., Luthans, F., & Jeung, W. (2014). Thriving at work: Impact of psychological capital and supervisor support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(3), 434-446.
  • Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of happiness studies, 6(1), 25-41.
  • Porath, C., Spreitzer, G., Gibson, C., & Garnett, F. G. (2012). Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 250-275.
  • Porter, G. (1996), “Organizational Impact of Workaholism: Suggestions for Researching the Negative Outcomes of Excessive Work”, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1(1), pp. 70.
  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior research methods, 36(4), 717-731.
  • Schaef, A. W. ve Fassel, D. (1988), The Addictive Organization, Harper ve Row Publishers.
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W., & Bakker, A. B. (2008). It takes two to tango. Workaholism is working excessively and working compulsively. The long work hours culture. Causes, consequences and choices, 203-226.
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W., & Van Rhenen, W. (2008). Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement: three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well‐being?. Applied Psychology, 57(2), 173-203.
  • Shimazu, A., Schaufeli, W. B. ve Taris, T. W. (2010), “How Does Workaholism Affect Worker Health And Performance? The Mediating Role of Coping”, International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 17(2), pp. 154-160.
  • Singelis, T. M., & Brown, W. J. (1995). Culture, self, and collectivist communication linking culture to individual behavior. Human communication research, 21(3), 354-389.
  • Singelis, T. M., Bond, M. H., Sharkey, W. F., & Lai, C. S. Y. (1999). Unpackaging culture’s influence on self-esteem and embarrassability: The role of self-construals. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(3), 315-341.
  • Sonenshein, S., Dutton, J. E., Grant, A. M., Spreitzer, G. M., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2013). Growing at work: Employees' interpretations of progressive self-change in organizations. Organization Science, 24(2), 552-570.
  • Spreitzer, G. M., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007). Thriving in organizations. Positive organizational behavior, 74-85.
  • Spreitzer, G., Sutcliffe, K., Dutton, J., Sonenshein, S., & Grant, A. M. (2005). A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organization science, 16(5), 537-549.
  • Tokat, L. (2006). Farabi felsefesinde mutluluğun araştırılması. Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi, 6(2), 133-157.
  • VIGODA‐GADOT, E. R. A. N. (2006). Compulsory citizenship behavior: Theorizing some dark sides of the good soldier syndrome in organizations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 36(1), 77-93.
  • Wixom, B. H., & Watson, H. J. (2001). An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success. MIS quarterly, 17-41.

The Mediating Effect of Thriving at Work Between Workaholic Behaviors, Perceived Contribution and Life Satisfaction

Year 2021, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 83 - 93, 29.06.2021

Recep Özsürünç Ömer Erdem Koçak

https://doi.org/10.51524/uhusbad.940291

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate whether thriving at work plays a mediator role in two relationships between workaholic behaviors and (i)perceived contribution to organization, and (ii)life satisfaction in order to shed light on how it can influence employees both job and off-job life. Using convenience sampling method, data was collected from 259 (n=189) participants. Results of the structural equation modelling with bootstrap method indicated that thriving at work is an underlying mechanism for the effect of workaholic behaviors to both life satisfaction and perceived contribution to organization. These findings revealed that workaholic behaviors are not only those result negative outcomes but also have a bright side for those feel vitality and learning.

Keywords

Life Satisfaction Thriving at Work Perceived Contribution to Organization

References

  • Abid, G., Zahra, I., & Ahmed, A. (2015). Mediated Mechanism of Thriving at Work between Perceived Organization Support, Innovative Work Behavior and Turnover Intention. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 9(3), 982-998.
  • Alkan, S. E., & Turgut, T. (2015). A research about the relationship of psychological safety and organizational politics perception with compulsory citizenship behavior and the pressures behind compulsory citizenship behavior. Research journal of Business and Management, 2(2), 185-203.
  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2010). IBM SPSS Amos 19 user’s guide. Crawfordville, FL: Amos Development Corporation, 635.
  • Avanzi, L., van Dick, R., Fraccaroli, F., & Sarchielli, G. (2012). The downside of organizational identification: Relations between identification, workaholism and well-being. Work & Stress, 26(3), 289-307.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
  • Baruch, Y. (2011). )e Positive Wellbeing Aspects of Workaholism in Cross Cultural Perspective the Chocoholism Metaphor. Career Development International, 16(6), 572–591. doi:10.1108/13620431111178335
  • Bolino, M. C. (1999). Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors?. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 82-98. Bowen, N. K., & Guo, S. (2011). Structural equation modeling. Oxford University Press.
  • Chacko, T. I. (1983). Job and life satisfactions: A causal analysis of their relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 26(1), 163-169.
  • Chin, W. W., Gopal, A., & Salisbury, W. D. (1997). Advancing the theory of adaptive structuration: The development of a scale to measure faithfulness of appropriation. Information systems research, 8(4), 342-367.
  • Clark, M. A., Michel, J. S., Stevens, G. W., Howell, J. W., & Scruggs, R. S. (2014). Workaholism, work engagement and work–home outcomes: Exploring the mediating role of positive and negative emotions. Stress and Health, 30(4), 287-300.
  • Deiner, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, Vol 55(1), 34-43.
  • Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J. ve Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49(1), 71-75.
  • Diener, E., Sapyta, J. J., & Suh, E. (1998). Subjective well-being is essential to well-being. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 33-37.
  • Du, D., Derks, D., Bakker, A. B., & Lu, C. Q. (2017). Does homesickness undermine the potential of job resources? A perspective from the work–home resources model. Journal of Organizational Behavior.
  • Dursun, S. ve İştar, E. (2014). Kadın Çalışanların Yaşamış Oldukları İş Aile Yaşamı Çatışmasının İş Ve Yaşam Doyumu Üzerine Etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 28(3), 127-137.
  • Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(1), 5.
  • Erdoğan, B., Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., & Mansfield, L. R. (2012). Whistle while you work: A review of the life satisfaction literature. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1038-1083.
  • Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press.
  • Fassel, D. (1990), Working Ourselves to Death: The High Cost of Workaholism, the Rewards of Recovery, Harper San Francisco.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50.
  • Geurts, S. A., & Sonnentag, S. (2006). Recovery as an explanatory mechanism in the relation between acute stress reactions and chronic health impairment. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 482-492.
  • Gini, A. L. (1998), “Working Ourselves to Death: Workaholism, Stress, And Fatigue”, Business and Society Review, 100(1), pp. 45-56.
  • Grant, A. (2014). Give and take: Why helping others drives our success. Penguin.
  • Grant, A. M., & Mayer, D. M. (2009). Good soldiers and good actors: prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 900.
  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: a review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long range planning, 45(5), 320-340.
  • Hochschild, A. R. (1997). When work becomes home and home becomes work. California Management Review, 39(4), 79-97.
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
  • Iris, B. ve Barrett, G. V. (1972). Some relations between job and life satisfaction and job importance. Journal of applied Psychology, 56(4), 301-304. Killinger, B. (1991), Workaholics: the Respectable Addicts, Simon and Schuster, New York, NY.
  • Koçak, Ö. E. (2016). How to Enable Thriving at Work through Organizational Trust. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 5(4), 40.
  • Koçak, Ö.E. (2017) How Employees Thrive at Work? Importance of Relationship Quality, Person-Job Fit, and Recovery Experiences After Work Hours. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Marmara University. İstanbul.
  • Koçak, Ö.E., Erebak, S. (2017) İş Amaçlı Akıllı Telefon Kullanımı ve İş-Ev Dengesi İlişkisi: İşkolikliğin Aracı Değişken Etkisi. İş, Güç Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi (İncelemede)
  • Korn, E. R., Pratt, G. J. ve Lambrou, P. T. (1987), Hyper-Performance: The AIM Strategy for Releasing Your Business Potential, John Wiley ve Sons.
  • Libano, M. D., Salanova, M., & Schaufeli, W. (2010). Validity of a brief workaholism scale. Psicothema-Revista de Psicologia, 22(1), 143-150.
  • London, M., Crandall, R. ve Seals, G. W. (1977). The contribution of job and leisure satisfaction to quality of life. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(3), 328-334.
  • Machlowitz, M. (1980), Workaholics, Living with Them, Working with Them, Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
  • Matuska, K. M. (2010). Workaholism, life balance, and well‐being: a comparative analysis. Journal of Occupational Science, 17(2), 104-111.
  • McClelland, D. C. (1965). Toward a theory of motive acquisition. American psychologist, 20(5), 321.
  • McMillan, L. H. W. (2002). Workaholism: How Does it Impact on People's Lives?.
  • Naughton, T. J. (1987). A conceptual view of workaholism and implications for career counseling and research. The Career Development Quarterly, 35(3), 180-187.
  • Nix, G. A., Ryan, R. M., Manly, J. B., & Deci, E. L. (1999). Revitalization through self-regulation: The effects of autonomous and controlled motivation on happiness and vitality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(3), 266-284.
  • Oates, W. E. (1971), Confessions of a Workaholic: The Facts about Work Addiction, World Publishing Company.
  • Orpen, C. (1978). Work and Nonwork Satisfaction: A Causal-Correlational Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4), 530-532.
  • Özer, M. ve Karabulut, Ö. Ö. (2003). Life satisfaction in the elderly. Yaşlılarda yaşam doyumu. Geriatri, 6(2), 72-74.
  • Paterson, T. A., Luthans, F., & Jeung, W. (2014). Thriving at work: Impact of psychological capital and supervisor support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(3), 434-446.
  • Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of happiness studies, 6(1), 25-41.
  • Porath, C., Spreitzer, G., Gibson, C., & Garnett, F. G. (2012). Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 250-275.
  • Porter, G. (1996), “Organizational Impact of Workaholism: Suggestions for Researching the Negative Outcomes of Excessive Work”, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1(1), pp. 70.
  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior research methods, 36(4), 717-731.
  • Schaef, A. W. ve Fassel, D. (1988), The Addictive Organization, Harper ve Row Publishers.
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W., & Bakker, A. B. (2008). It takes two to tango. Workaholism is working excessively and working compulsively. The long work hours culture. Causes, consequences and choices, 203-226.
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W., & Van Rhenen, W. (2008). Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement: three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well‐being?. Applied Psychology, 57(2), 173-203.
  • Shimazu, A., Schaufeli, W. B. ve Taris, T. W. (2010), “How Does Workaholism Affect Worker Health And Performance? The Mediating Role of Coping”, International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 17(2), pp. 154-160.
  • Singelis, T. M., & Brown, W. J. (1995). Culture, self, and collectivist communication linking culture to individual behavior. Human communication research, 21(3), 354-389.
  • Singelis, T. M., Bond, M. H., Sharkey, W. F., & Lai, C. S. Y. (1999). Unpackaging culture’s influence on self-esteem and embarrassability: The role of self-construals. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(3), 315-341.
  • Sonenshein, S., Dutton, J. E., Grant, A. M., Spreitzer, G. M., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2013). Growing at work: Employees' interpretations of progressive self-change in organizations. Organization Science, 24(2), 552-570.
  • Spreitzer, G. M., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007). Thriving in organizations. Positive organizational behavior, 74-85.
  • Spreitzer, G., Sutcliffe, K., Dutton, J., Sonenshein, S., & Grant, A. M. (2005). A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organization science, 16(5), 537-549.
  • Tokat, L. (2006). Farabi felsefesinde mutluluğun araştırılması. Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi, 6(2), 133-157.
  • VIGODA‐GADOT, E. R. A. N. (2006). Compulsory citizenship behavior: Theorizing some dark sides of the good soldier syndrome in organizations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 36(1), 77-93.
  • Wixom, B. H., & Watson, H. J. (2001). An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success. MIS quarterly, 17-41.
There are 60 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Recep Özsürünç 0000-0001-6599-7823

Ömer Erdem Koçak 0000-0002-4649-2042

Publication Date June 29, 2021
Submission Date May 20, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021 Volume: 3 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Özsürünç, R., & Koçak, Ö. E. (2021). İşkolik Davranışlar, Algılanan Katkı ve Yaşam Doyumu İlişkisinde İşte Kendini Yetiştirmenin Aracı Etkisi. Uluslararası Hukuk Ve Sosyal Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 83-93. https://doi.org/10.51524/uhusbad.940291
AMA Özsürünç R, Koçak ÖE. İşkolik Davranışlar, Algılanan Katkı ve Yaşam Doyumu İlişkisinde İşte Kendini Yetiştirmenin Aracı Etkisi. UHUSBAD. June 2021;3(1):83-93. doi:10.51524/uhusbad.940291
Chicago Özsürünç, Recep, and Ömer Erdem Koçak. “İşkolik Davranışlar, Algılanan Katkı Ve Yaşam Doyumu İlişkisinde İşte Kendini Yetiştirmenin Aracı Etkisi”. Uluslararası Hukuk Ve Sosyal Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 3, no. 1 (June 2021): 83-93. https://doi.org/10.51524/uhusbad.940291.
EndNote Özsürünç R, Koçak ÖE (June 1, 2021) İşkolik Davranışlar, Algılanan Katkı ve Yaşam Doyumu İlişkisinde İşte Kendini Yetiştirmenin Aracı Etkisi. Uluslararası Hukuk ve Sosyal Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 3 1 83–93.
IEEE R. Özsürünç and Ö. E. Koçak, “İşkolik Davranışlar, Algılanan Katkı ve Yaşam Doyumu İlişkisinde İşte Kendini Yetiştirmenin Aracı Etkisi”, UHUSBAD, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 83–93, 2021, doi: 10.51524/uhusbad.940291.
ISNAD Özsürünç, Recep - Koçak, Ömer Erdem. “İşkolik Davranışlar, Algılanan Katkı Ve Yaşam Doyumu İlişkisinde İşte Kendini Yetiştirmenin Aracı Etkisi”. Uluslararası Hukuk ve Sosyal Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 3/1 (June 2021), 83-93. https://doi.org/10.51524/uhusbad.940291.
JAMA Özsürünç R, Koçak ÖE. İşkolik Davranışlar, Algılanan Katkı ve Yaşam Doyumu İlişkisinde İşte Kendini Yetiştirmenin Aracı Etkisi. UHUSBAD. 2021;3:83–93.
MLA Özsürünç, Recep and Ömer Erdem Koçak. “İşkolik Davranışlar, Algılanan Katkı Ve Yaşam Doyumu İlişkisinde İşte Kendini Yetiştirmenin Aracı Etkisi”. Uluslararası Hukuk Ve Sosyal Bilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 3, no. 1, 2021, pp. 83-93, doi:10.51524/uhusbad.940291.
Vancouver Özsürünç R, Koçak ÖE. İşkolik Davranışlar, Algılanan Katkı ve Yaşam Doyumu İlişkisinde İşte Kendini Yetiştirmenin Aracı Etkisi. UHUSBAD. 2021;3(1):83-9.
 Download Cover Image

20472   1903718612 18578 1855718501  17353      18731    18926   20416  18968 17352