Translation
BibTex RIS Cite

Naturalizme Karşı Evrimsel Argüman II: İçerik ve Doğal Seçilim

Year 2023, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 52 - 75, 30.06.2023

Abstract

Alvin Plantinga bu makalede çağdaş zihin felsefesinden alınan çeşitli epistemik içerik teorileri ele almaktadır ve bu teorilerin daha önce Naturalizme Karşı Evrimsel Argüman isimli makalesinde P(R⁄N&E) önermesinin R (rasyonel olarak geçerli olma) koşulu için ortaya attığı çürütene (defeater) karşı bir çürüten-saptırıcı (defeater-deflector) işlevi görüp göremeyeceğini soruşturmaktadır. İşlevselciliğin (functionalism) yanında, Dretske semantiği, Boolean yapıları, mümkün dünyalar semantiği, Millikan paradigmaları ve teleosemantik gibi teorileri incelemektedir. Nihai olarak Plantinga, bahsi geçen teorilerin, R için bir çürüten-saptırıcı görevini yerine getirme noktasında başarısız olduğunu, Naturalizme Karşı Evrimsel Argüman’da ortaya koyduğu argümanın-yani bir kimsenin hem evrimi hem de naturalizmi aynı anda savunmasının rasyonel olmadığını- yapılan muhtelif itirazlara karşın hâlâ geçerli olduğunu göstermektedir

References

  • Beilby, James (ed.). Naturalism Defeated?: Essays on Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002.
  • Dawkins, Richard. The God Delusion. Boston: Mariner Books, Reprint edition., 2008.
  • Dretske, Fred. Explaining Behavior. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1988.
  • Dretske, Fred. Naturalizing the Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1997.
  • Fodor, Jerry. A Theory of Content and Other Essays. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1990.
  • Ginet, Carl. “Comments on Plantinga’s Two-Volume Work on Warrant”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55/2 (1995).
  • Hitchens, Christopher. God is Not Great: How Religion Poison Everything. McClelland & Stewart, 2008.
  • Kim, Jaegwon. Mind in a Physical World. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999.
  • Kim, Jaegwon. “Précis of Mind in a Physical World”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65/3 (2002).
  • Kim, Jaegwon. “Responses”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65/3 (2002).
  • Loewer, Barry. “Comments on Jaegwon Kim’s Mind and the [sic] Physical World”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65/3 (ts.).
  • Loewer, Barry. “From Information to Intensionality”. Mental Representation. ed. Stephen Stich - Ted Warfield. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1994.
  • Millikan, Ruth. “Biosemantic”. Mental Representation. ed. Stephen Stich - Ted Warfield. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994. O’Connor, Timothy. “An Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 24/4 (1994).
  • Otte, Richard. “Conditional Probabilities in Plantinga’s Argument”. Naturalism Defeated? Essays on Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002.
  • Plantinga, Alvin. “Against Materialism”. Persons: Human and Divine. ed. Peter van Inwagen - Dean Zimmerman. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007.
  • Plantinga, Alvin. “Content and Natural Selection”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LXXXII/2 (2011).
  • Plantinga, Alvin. “Evolution, Epiphenomenalism, Reductionism”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68/3 (2004).
  • Plantinga, Alvin. “Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism”. Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
  • Plantinga, Alvin. Warrant and Christian Belief. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  • Plantinga, Alvin. Warrant and Proper Function. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
  • Plantinga, Alvin. “Against Materialism”. Faith and Philosophy 23/1 (2006).
  • Plantinga, Alvin - Tooley, Michael. Knowledge of God. Oxford: Blackwell, 2008.
  • Ramsey, William. Representation Reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • Simmons, Sheri L. “South-seeking magnetotactic bacteria in the Northern Hemisphere”. Science, 371-374.

Evolutionary Argument against Naturalism II: Content and Natural Selection

Year 2023, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 52 - 75, 30.06.2023

Abstract

In this article, Alvin Plantinga discusses various theories of epistemic content drawn from contemporary philosophy of mind, and these theories offer a rebuttal against the premise of P(R⁄N&E) for the R (rationally valid) condition in his article The Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism. It is investigating whether it can function as a deflector. Besides functionalism, he examines theories such as Dretske semantics, Boolean structures, possible worlds semantics, Millikan paradigms and teleosemantics. Ultimately, Plantinga still argues that, despite various objections, the aforementioned theories fail to serve as a rebuttal-deflector for R, the argument he put forward in The Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism—that is, that it is not rational for one to defend both evolution and naturalism at the same time.

References

  • Beilby, James (ed.). Naturalism Defeated?: Essays on Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002.
  • Dawkins, Richard. The God Delusion. Boston: Mariner Books, Reprint edition., 2008.
  • Dretske, Fred. Explaining Behavior. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1988.
  • Dretske, Fred. Naturalizing the Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1997.
  • Fodor, Jerry. A Theory of Content and Other Essays. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1990.
  • Ginet, Carl. “Comments on Plantinga’s Two-Volume Work on Warrant”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55/2 (1995).
  • Hitchens, Christopher. God is Not Great: How Religion Poison Everything. McClelland & Stewart, 2008.
  • Kim, Jaegwon. Mind in a Physical World. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999.
  • Kim, Jaegwon. “Précis of Mind in a Physical World”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65/3 (2002).
  • Kim, Jaegwon. “Responses”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65/3 (2002).
  • Loewer, Barry. “Comments on Jaegwon Kim’s Mind and the [sic] Physical World”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65/3 (ts.).
  • Loewer, Barry. “From Information to Intensionality”. Mental Representation. ed. Stephen Stich - Ted Warfield. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1994.
  • Millikan, Ruth. “Biosemantic”. Mental Representation. ed. Stephen Stich - Ted Warfield. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994. O’Connor, Timothy. “An Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 24/4 (1994).
  • Otte, Richard. “Conditional Probabilities in Plantinga’s Argument”. Naturalism Defeated? Essays on Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002.
  • Plantinga, Alvin. “Against Materialism”. Persons: Human and Divine. ed. Peter van Inwagen - Dean Zimmerman. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007.
  • Plantinga, Alvin. “Content and Natural Selection”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LXXXII/2 (2011).
  • Plantinga, Alvin. “Evolution, Epiphenomenalism, Reductionism”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68/3 (2004).
  • Plantinga, Alvin. “Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism”. Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
  • Plantinga, Alvin. Warrant and Christian Belief. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  • Plantinga, Alvin. Warrant and Proper Function. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
  • Plantinga, Alvin. “Against Materialism”. Faith and Philosophy 23/1 (2006).
  • Plantinga, Alvin - Tooley, Michael. Knowledge of God. Oxford: Blackwell, 2008.
  • Ramsey, William. Representation Reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • Simmons, Sheri L. “South-seeking magnetotactic bacteria in the Northern Hemisphere”. Science, 371-374.
There are 24 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Philosophy, Religious Studies
Journal Section Translations
Translators

Tugay Taşçı

Publication Date June 30, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 6 Issue: 1

Cite

ISNAD , trans.Taşçı, Tugay. “Naturalizme Karşı Evrimsel Argüman II: İçerik Ve Doğal Seçilim”. Din ve Felsefe Araştırmaları 6/1 (June 2023), 52-75.
Din ve Felsefe Araştırmaları Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır. Creative Commons Lisansı