A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF SOLAR ENERGY-TECHNO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FROM AKSARAY CITY, TURKEY

Tolga Taner

doi:10.18186/thermal.505498

Note

A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF SOLAR ENERGY-TECHNO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FROM AKSARAY CITY, TURKEY

Year 2019, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 25 - 30, 03.10.2018

Tolga Taner

https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.505498

Cited By: 13

Abstract

This study
posed a feasibility study of solar energy-techno economic analysis that was
investigated for 20,000 m² area of Aksaray city from Turkey. The
result of a solar energy radiation production was found to be 1.65 million
[kWh/m² year]. The profit of solar energy plant was determined about
501,825 [$/y]. A simple payback period time was found to be 4.5 [y]. The aim of
the study is to indicate building solar energy plant that can be efficiently
for Aksaray city. Since a solar energy plant can be a feasible plant for Yapilcan
village, Aksaray city that is near the power line local area network. These
results figure out very efficient result for building solar energy plant to
Yapilcan village, Aksaray city from Turkey.

Keywords

Renewable Energy, Solar Energy, Techno Economic Analysis, Energy

References

[1] Çetin, M., Eğrican, N. (2011). Employment impacts of solar energy in Turkey. Energy Policy, 39(11), 7184-7190.
[2] Toklu, E. (2017). Biomass energy potential and utilization in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 107, 235-244.
[3] Melikoglu, M. (2016). The role of renewables and nuclear energy in Turkey׳ s Vision 2023 energy targets: Economic and technical scrutiny. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, 1-12.
[4] Devrim, Y., Bilir, L. (2016). Performance investigation of a wind turbine–solar photovoltaic panels–fuel cell hybrid system installed at İncek region–Ankara, Turkey. Energy Conversion and Management, 126, 759-766.
[5] Eksi, G., Karaosmanoglu, F. (2017). Combined bioheat and biopower: A technology review and an assessment for Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 73, 1313-1332.
[6] Ozden, E., Tari, I. (2016). Energy–exergy and economic analyses of a hybrid solar–hydrogen renewable energy system in Ankara, Turkey. Applied Thermal Engineering, 99, 169-178.
[7] Badea, G., Naghiu, G. S., Giurca, I., Aşchilean, I., Megyesi, E. (2017). Hydrogen production using solar energy-technical analysis. Energy Procedia, 112, 418-425.
[8] Morcillo-Herrera, C., Hernández-Sánchez, F., Flota-Bañuelos, M. (2015). Method to calculate the electricity generated by a photovoltaic cell, based on its mathematical model simulations in MATLAB. International Journal of Photoenergy, 2015.
[9] The Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources (2017). General Directorate of Renewable Energy. Available from: http://www.eie.gov.tr
[10] Lazard's Levelized Cost of Energy Analysis, Version 8.0, 2016.
[11] International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). (2012). Renewable energy technologies: cost analysis series: Solar Photovoltaics, Volume 1: Power Sector Issue 4/5: 1-56.
[12] International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), Renewable power generation costs in 2014, 2015.
[13] Photovoltaic & Solar Electricity Design Tools. Available from: www.photovoltaic-software.com, Access date: 14/06/2017.
[14] Koppelaar, R. H. E. M. (2017). Solar-PV energy payback and net energy: Meta-assessment of study quality, reproducibility, and results harmonization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 1241-1255.
[15] Thakur, J., Chakraborty, B. (2015). A study of feasible smart tariff alternatives for smart grid integrated solar panels in India. Energy, 93, 963-975.

Year 2019, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 25 - 30, 03.10.2018

Tolga Taner

https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.505498

Cited By: 13

Abstract

References

[1] Çetin, M., Eğrican, N. (2011). Employment impacts of solar energy in Turkey. Energy Policy, 39(11), 7184-7190.
[2] Toklu, E. (2017). Biomass energy potential and utilization in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 107, 235-244.
[3] Melikoglu, M. (2016). The role of renewables and nuclear energy in Turkey׳ s Vision 2023 energy targets: Economic and technical scrutiny. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, 1-12.
[4] Devrim, Y., Bilir, L. (2016). Performance investigation of a wind turbine–solar photovoltaic panels–fuel cell hybrid system installed at İncek region–Ankara, Turkey. Energy Conversion and Management, 126, 759-766.
[5] Eksi, G., Karaosmanoglu, F. (2017). Combined bioheat and biopower: A technology review and an assessment for Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 73, 1313-1332.
[6] Ozden, E., Tari, I. (2016). Energy–exergy and economic analyses of a hybrid solar–hydrogen renewable energy system in Ankara, Turkey. Applied Thermal Engineering, 99, 169-178.
[7] Badea, G., Naghiu, G. S., Giurca, I., Aşchilean, I., Megyesi, E. (2017). Hydrogen production using solar energy-technical analysis. Energy Procedia, 112, 418-425.
[8] Morcillo-Herrera, C., Hernández-Sánchez, F., Flota-Bañuelos, M. (2015). Method to calculate the electricity generated by a photovoltaic cell, based on its mathematical model simulations in MATLAB. International Journal of Photoenergy, 2015.
[9] The Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources (2017). General Directorate of Renewable Energy. Available from: http://www.eie.gov.tr
[10] Lazard's Levelized Cost of Energy Analysis, Version 8.0, 2016.
[11] International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). (2012). Renewable energy technologies: cost analysis series: Solar Photovoltaics, Volume 1: Power Sector Issue 4/5: 1-56.
[12] International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), Renewable power generation costs in 2014, 2015.
[13] Photovoltaic & Solar Electricity Design Tools. Available from: www.photovoltaic-software.com, Access date: 14/06/2017.
[14] Koppelaar, R. H. E. M. (2017). Solar-PV energy payback and net energy: Meta-assessment of study quality, reproducibility, and results harmonization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 1241-1255.
[15] Thakur, J., Chakraborty, B. (2015). A study of feasible smart tariff alternatives for smart grid integrated solar panels in India. Energy, 93, 963-975.

There are 15 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language	English
Journal Section	Articles
Authors	Tolga Taner
Publication Date	October 3, 2018
Submission Date	June 6, 2017
Published in Issue	Year 2019 Volume: 5 Issue: 1

Cite

APA	Taner, T. (2018). A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF SOLAR ENERGY-TECHNO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FROM AKSARAY CITY, TURKEY. Journal of Thermal Engineering, 5(1), 25-30. https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.505498
AMA	Taner T. A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF SOLAR ENERGY-TECHNO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FROM AKSARAY CITY, TURKEY. Journal of Thermal Engineering. October 2018;5(1):25-30. doi:10.18186/thermal.505498
Chicago	Taner, Tolga. “A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF SOLAR ENERGY-TECHNO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FROM AKSARAY CITY, TURKEY”. Journal of Thermal Engineering 5, no. 1 (October 2018): 25-30. https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.505498.
EndNote	Taner T (October 1, 2018) A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF SOLAR ENERGY-TECHNO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FROM AKSARAY CITY, TURKEY. Journal of Thermal Engineering 5 1 25–30.
IEEE	T. Taner, “A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF SOLAR ENERGY-TECHNO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FROM AKSARAY CITY, TURKEY”, Journal of Thermal Engineering, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 2018, doi: 10.18186/thermal.505498.
ISNAD	Taner, Tolga. “A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF SOLAR ENERGY-TECHNO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FROM AKSARAY CITY, TURKEY”. Journal of Thermal Engineering 5/1 (October 2018), 25-30. https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.505498.
JAMA	Taner T. A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF SOLAR ENERGY-TECHNO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FROM AKSARAY CITY, TURKEY. Journal of Thermal Engineering. 2018;5:25–30.
MLA	Taner, Tolga. “A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF SOLAR ENERGY-TECHNO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FROM AKSARAY CITY, TURKEY”. Journal of Thermal Engineering, vol. 5, no. 1, 2018, pp. 25-30, doi:10.18186/thermal.505498.
Vancouver	Taner T. A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF SOLAR ENERGY-TECHNO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FROM AKSARAY CITY, TURKEY. Journal of Thermal Engineering. 2018;5(1):25-30.