MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODOLOGY FOR COURSE EVALUATION AND SELECTION IN BOLOGNA PROCESS

Özden Üstün; Şafak Kırış; Derya Deliktaş

Research Article

MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODOLOGY FOR COURSE EVALUATION AND SELECTION IN BOLOGNA PROCESS

Year 2015, Issue: 45, 1 - 9, 30.07.2015

Abstract

The Bologna process is the creation of the European Higher Education Area by making academic degree standards
and quality assurance standards more comparable and compatible throughout Europe. The universities aimed to be in the
European Higher Education Area have to adapt their systems to the Bologna process. One of the main problems in the adaptation
process is to evaluate and select the courses by considering the stakeholders’ opinions and Bologna process’ restrictions. In this
study, a multi-criteria decision making methodology is proposed to solve the course evaluation and selection problem. The
proposed multi-criteria decision making methodology is applied to a graduate program of an Industrial Engineering Department.

Keywords

Multi-criteria decision making, Analytical Hierarchy Process, course evaluation, group decision making, Bologna process

References

Aktar Demirtas, E., Anagun, A.S. and Koksal, G. (2009). Determination of optimal product sytles by ordinal logistic regression versus conjoint analysis for kitchen faucets”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39, 866-875.
Cano, M.D. (2010). Students’ Involvement in Continuous Assessment Methodologies: A Case Study for a Distributed
Information Systems Course, IEEE Transactions on Eduation. DOI: 10.1109/TE.2010.2073708.
Erişen, Y., Çeliköz, N., Kurtkan Kapıcıoğlu, M.O., Akyol, C. and Ataş, S. (2009). The needs for professional development of academic staff at vocational education faculties in Turkey, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 1, 1431–1436.
“Expert Choice software and manual”, Expert Choice, Inc., 4922 Elsworth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Grossman, G.M., Sands, M.K. and Brittingham, B. (2010). Teacher education accreditation in Turkey: The creation of a culture of quality, International Journal of Educational Development 30,102–109.
Gül, H., Gül, S.S., Kaya, E. and Alican, A. (2010). Main trends in the world of higher education, internationalization and institutional DOI:1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.417. Behavioral autonomy, Procedia Social and Sciences 9,1878–1884,1877-0428, Elsevier Ltd.,
Kabakçı,I., Kılıçer,K., Birinci,G., Şahin,M.C. and Odabaşı,H.F. (2010). A new step in Turkish higher education system: Program outcomes, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 9,2010,76-80.
Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Saaty, T.L. (1985). Decision making for leaders, Belmont, California: Life Time Leaning Publications.
Saaty, T.L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process, European Journal of Operational Research, North- Holland;48:9±26.
Saaty, T.L. and Kearns, K.P. (1991). Analytical planning: the organization of systems, The analytic hierarchy process series,vol. 4RWS, Publications Pittsburgh, USA.

BOLOGNA SÜRECİNDE DERS DEĞERLENDİRME VE SEÇİMİ İÇİN ÇOK ÖLÇÜTLÜ KARAR VERME YÖNTEMİ

Year 2015, Issue: 45, 1 - 9, 30.07.2015

Özden Üstün Şafak Kırış Derya Deliktaş

Abstract

Bologna süreci, akademik değerlendirme ve kalite güvence standartlarını Avrupa’da daha uyumlu ve daha
karşılaştırılabilir yaparak Avrupa Yükseköğretim Alanı’nı oluşturma olarak tanımlanır. Avrupa Yükseköğretim Alanı’nda olmayı
amaçlayan üniversiteler, sistemlerini Bologna sürecine adapte emek zorunda kalmışlardır. Adaptasyon sürecindeki ana
problemlerden biri, Bologna sürecinin kısıtlarını ve paydaşların düşüncelerini dikkate alarak derslerin değerlendirilmesi ve
seçilmesidir. Bu çalışmada çok ölçütlü karar verme yöntemi, dersleri değerlendirme ve seçme problemini çözmek için
önerilmiştir. Önerilen çok ölçütlü karar verme yöntemi, bir Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümü’nün lisans programına uygulanmıştır.

Keywords

Çok ölçütlü karar verme, Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci, ders değerlendirme, grup karar verme, Bologna süreci

References

Aktar Demirtas, E., Anagun, A.S. and Koksal, G. (2009). Determination of optimal product sytles by ordinal logistic regression versus conjoint analysis for kitchen faucets”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39, 866-875.
Cano, M.D. (2010). Students’ Involvement in Continuous Assessment Methodologies: A Case Study for a Distributed
Information Systems Course, IEEE Transactions on Eduation. DOI: 10.1109/TE.2010.2073708.
Erişen, Y., Çeliköz, N., Kurtkan Kapıcıoğlu, M.O., Akyol, C. and Ataş, S. (2009). The needs for professional development of academic staff at vocational education faculties in Turkey, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 1, 1431–1436.
“Expert Choice software and manual”, Expert Choice, Inc., 4922 Elsworth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Grossman, G.M., Sands, M.K. and Brittingham, B. (2010). Teacher education accreditation in Turkey: The creation of a culture of quality, International Journal of Educational Development 30,102–109.
Gül, H., Gül, S.S., Kaya, E. and Alican, A. (2010). Main trends in the world of higher education, internationalization and institutional DOI:1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.417. Behavioral autonomy, Procedia Social and Sciences 9,1878–1884,1877-0428, Elsevier Ltd.,
Kabakçı,I., Kılıçer,K., Birinci,G., Şahin,M.C. and Odabaşı,H.F. (2010). A new step in Turkish higher education system: Program outcomes, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 9,2010,76-80.
Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Saaty, T.L. (1985). Decision making for leaders, Belmont, California: Life Time Leaning Publications.
Saaty, T.L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process, European Journal of Operational Research, North- Holland;48:9±26.
Saaty, T.L. and Kearns, K.P. (1991). Analytical planning: the organization of systems, The analytic hierarchy process series,vol. 4RWS, Publications Pittsburgh, USA.

There are 12 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language	English
Journal Section	Articles
Authors	Özden Üstün Şafak Kırış Derya Deliktaş
Publication Date	July 30, 2015
Published in Issue	Year 2015 Issue: 45

Cite

APA	Üstün, Ö., Kırış, Ş., & Deliktaş, D. (2015). MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODOLOGY FOR COURSE EVALUATION AND SELECTION IN BOLOGNA PROCESS. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi(45), 1-9.
AMA	Üstün Ö, Kırış Ş, Deliktaş D. MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODOLOGY FOR COURSE EVALUATION AND SELECTION IN BOLOGNA PROCESS. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. July 2015;(45):1-9.
Chicago	Üstün, Özden, Şafak Kırış, and Derya Deliktaş. “MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODOLOGY FOR COURSE EVALUATION AND SELECTION IN BOLOGNA PROCESS”. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, no. 45 (July 2015): 1-9.
EndNote	Üstün Ö, Kırış Ş, Deliktaş D (July 1, 2015) MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODOLOGY FOR COURSE EVALUATION AND SELECTION IN BOLOGNA PROCESS. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 45 1–9.
IEEE	Ö. Üstün, Ş. Kırış, and D. Deliktaş, “MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODOLOGY FOR COURSE EVALUATION AND SELECTION IN BOLOGNA PROCESS”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, no. 45, pp. 1–9, July 2015.
ISNAD	Üstün, Özden et al. “MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODOLOGY FOR COURSE EVALUATION AND SELECTION IN BOLOGNA PROCESS”. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 45 (July 2015), 1-9.
JAMA	Üstün Ö, Kırış Ş, Deliktaş D. MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODOLOGY FOR COURSE EVALUATION AND SELECTION IN BOLOGNA PROCESS. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2015;:1–9.
MLA	Üstün, Özden et al. “MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODOLOGY FOR COURSE EVALUATION AND SELECTION IN BOLOGNA PROCESS”. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, no. 45, 2015, pp. 1-9.
Vancouver	Üstün Ö, Kırış Ş, Deliktaş D. MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODOLOGY FOR COURSE EVALUATION AND SELECTION IN BOLOGNA PROCESS. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2015(45):1-9.